Music Video: 'I Hate Republicans'

[Zebra 3]

[center:4c57feac69]CLICK HERE (http://www.bushflash.com/ihr.html)[/center:4c57feac69]

[ArrowX]

lol

[FS]

Not even clever in the slightest.

[El Blanco]

What does it say about someone when the first thing they want to tell you is what they are against?

Mandatory Bush/Hitler comparison. Considering how most neo-nazis and KKK members are actually lower class and these dopes are mad because Republicans are rich, I don't see the connection.

Also, a handfull of the people they highlighted AREN'T REPUBLICANS.

Of all the things people complain about Bush and the Republicans, all these mooks can do is bitch and moan about them being rich. Thats just petty.

If thats all it takes for them to hate a person, then where were Ralph Nader, Eddy Vetter, the Baldwins, Skeletor (Susan Surrandon) etc etc..........?

This isn't about me not digging their politics. Its about that being a shitty song and a bullshit video.

[AChimp]

That video was shit. Comparing Bush to Hitler is "heh heh" funny, just like comparing Mother Theresa to Yoda is, but it looses all credibility when it starts showing KKK members in one half of the screen and Bush/Cheney campaign supporters in the other half.

[ArrowX]

The best part is at the end with a guy standing in the back ground holding a sighn that says "Die N-word Die"

[Zebra 3]

Comparing Bush to Hitler is "heh heh" funny...
:lol - We all know by now the Fuhrer has so many friends.

[Zebra 3]

Mandatory Bush/Hitler comparison. Considering how most neo-nazis and KKK members are actually lower class and these dopes are mad because Republicans are rich, I don't see the connection.
[center:af0b41fd3d]http://img36.exs.cx/img36/3492/Defenders.th.jpg (http://img36.exs.cx/img36/3492/Defenders.jpg)

Click to enlarge[/center:af0b41fd3d]

[Captain Goodtimes]

It took you two months to come up with that yuk-yuk?

[El Blanco]

And did Team Bush make the picture on top, or is there someone with phtotoshop and no historical perspective?

[davinxtk]

And did Team Bush make the picture on top, or is there someone with phtotoshop and no historical perspective?



I didn't and won't watch the video, but I do hope that someone telling other people to have historical perspective doesn't take 9/11 very seriously.

[Immortal Goat]

Here's a much better (and more informative) animation from the same site. Much more disturbing, intelligent, and well made. Yes, is is kinda disturbing to watch, but watch it all the way through.

Your tax dollars at work (http://www.bushflash.com/pl_lo.html)

[Zhukov]

Oh no, our tax dollars!

BILL CLINTON KNEW WHAT'S WHAT!

I seriously couldn't watch all of it, it was that disturbing. How is it intelligent? Is because they know what a mini nuke is? Load of 'Democrats will make it better' arse.

And I'm all for DPRK for getting a nuclear weapon thankyou very much.

[davinxtk]

I'm all for pointing the world's nukes at some unsuspecting corner of the galaxy and saying "peace in the middle east" to the lot of them. We don't need that kind of destructive/contaminative power in the hands of ANYBODY, kossaks, chinks, sand ******s, and stupid white men alike.

[Preechr]

With our luck, we'd do that and hit some super aggressive alien species right in the planet and piss them off while letting em know we're ready for a fight...

[The One and Only...]

I might suggest clicking the "More Info" button after the end of the video.

[Spectre X]

The best way to get rid of nuclear weapons would be to send them into a big body in space where they can't do jack shit anymore.

I say Jupiter. Nobody's using it, and comets are ground up and reduced to dust in it.

[El Blanco]

And did Team Bush make the picture on top, or is there someone with phtotoshop and no historical perspective?



I didn't and won't watch the video, but I do hope that someone telling other people to have historical perspective doesn't take 9/11 very seriously.

You're right. Why should the obliteration of 3,000 people on brodcast live around the world be significant? I mean, there have been other times when more people died, so 9/11 has no value what-so-ever, right?

I certainly wasn't refering to the current presidential administration to the Thrid Reich. Nope, because I don't see that so full of hyperbole its almost insulting.

[Anonymous]

I'm all for pointing the world's nukes at some unsuspecting corner of the galaxy and saying "peace in the middle east" to the lot of them. We don't need that kind of destructive/contaminative power in the hands of ANYBODY, kossaks, chinks, sand ******s, and stupid white men alike.

Frankly, the fact that we still don't have satellite weapons is a slap in the face to every sci-fi movie that was good enough to not appear on the Sci Fi channel.

[davinxtk]

You're right. Why should the obliteration of 3,000 people on brodcast live around the world be significant? I mean, there have been other times when more people died, so 9/11 has no value what-so-ever, right?

I certainly wasn't refering to the current presidential administration to the Thrid Reich. Nope, because I don't see that so full of hyperbole its almost insulting.


Whop. Three thousand people. There are six billion alive that we should be way more concerned about protecting, you dumb fuck. We've used three thousand dead to kill how many in Iraq and Afghanistan combined? I think we've quite well avenged our miniscule-in-influence (remember when I say this that America just ain't full of half the caliber of religious fanatics that the middle-east is) loss and then some. So yeah, three thousand dead Americans on 9/11 is officially something I don't give a shit about.
I'm not trying to minimized the tragedy caused to any of the families involved, but seriously -- it's over. Life goes on.



Frankly, the fact that we still don't have satellite weapons is a slap in the face to every sci-fi movie that was good enough to not appear on the Sci Fi channel.
And how.

[The One and Only...]

You're only measuring historical significance in the number of lives the event took.

What a horribly flawed perspective.

[davinxtk]

Haha, what? Because America's too good to endure terrorist attacks? Other countries worldwide have had to put up with this kind of shit for decades, some of which we even financed ourselves. The only horribly flawed perspective here is that which puts us above the rest of the world, porky.

[Zhukov]

It's pretty obvious that 9/11 has had more historic significance than alot of similar tragedies that you've never heard of.

I'm actually agreeing with OOA here.

[davinxtk]

:rolleyes
I think you're both missing the point.
Sure, it has had way more historical significance than it should have, but in terms of historical perspective, it really shouldn't have been as significant an event as it was.

I'm not sure that I'm articulating my point very clearly here.

[El Blanco]

I think its more of a case that you don't realize what you're saying.

[davinxtk]

Oh yeah, that must be it. That's exactly the problem.

This place never runs out of two-bit smart-asses, does it?

[Zhukov]

9/11 deserved to be a major part of history because it was one.

I'm just being dialectical about this. You can argue that 3000 US citizens are as important as 3000 Sudanese citizens. It doesn't matter. Sudan isn't the major capitalist power of our time.

[Helm]

I don't dissagree with your point, I'd just like to point out that the usage of the word 'dialectic' here seems a bit misplaced, really. Not that anyone else notices.

[Zhukov]

I actually meant to say I was being a determinist about this. No edit.

Yeah, I didn't think anyone would notice. :/

[davinxtk]

9/11 deserved to be a major part of history because it was one.

I'm just being dialectical about this. You can argue that 3000 US citizens are as important as 3000 Sudanese citizens. It doesn't matter. Sudan isn't the major capitalist power of our time.

Zhukov, I'm not saying it wasn't important, I'm saying it was blown phenominally out of porportion. I was making the same point of things being blown out of porportion as Blanco was. And I didn't even disagree with his point in the first place, I was just making a glib remark about historical perspective and the way things get exaggerated.

[davinxtk]

And, in fact, either word fits the context but would give a completely different meaning to your sentence, each appropriate.

[Zhukov]

I was going to explain it using a dialectic method, but I couldn't be bothered so I fessed up.

I'm saying it was blown phenominally out of porportion.
As long as you realise that it needed to, and was always going to get blown out of proportion...

[davinxtk]

I can see 'needed to' in the context of bitchslapping Afghanistan, but everything that followed that is where the exaggeration becomes next to unnecessary.