Log in

View Full Version : Putting the Negroponte in the henhouse?!?


ziggytrix
Feb 17th, 2005, 01:58 PM
So whaddya think? Is the Senate gonna confirm him as easily as everyone else? I mean this guy has SKETCHY AS FUCK history with the FBI and CIA already, between his involvement in Honduras and the whole Iran-Contra hullabaloo.



http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7664262

Negroponte Named as New U.S. Intelligence Chief
Thu Feb 17, 2005 12:36 PM ET

By Tabassum Zakaria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush on Thursday named John Negroponte, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, to the new post of director of national intelligence, created to integrate America's diverse intelligence services after major failures before the Sept. 11 attacks and the Iraq war.

Announcing the surprise nomination, Bush gave strong personal support to Negroponte, who will have to curb bureaucratic infighting and organize closer cooperation between the Pentagon, CIA and other agencies.

"If we're going to stop the terrorists before they strike, we must ensure that our intelligence agencies work as a single, unified enterprise," Bush said at a news conference.

Negroponte, 65, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, has been ambassador to Baghdad for less than a year, prodding the country toward democracy in the teeth of a bloody insurgency prompted by the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

Creating the new position was a central recommendation of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks last year.

"I appreciate your confidence in choosing me for what will no doubt be the most challenging assignment I have undertaken in more than 40 years of government service," Negroponte said as he stood at Bush's side.

Bush picked National Security Agency Director Lt. Gen. Michael Hayden as Negroponte's deputy, putting together a team that will oversee the 15 U.S. intelligence agencies.

The new intelligence chief will give Bush his daily intelligence, a job previously done by the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Negroponte's appointment must be confirmed by the Senate.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican, called the two nominations "outstanding choices" and said confirmation hearings would begin as soon as Negroponte finished his job in Iraq.

The new job was created as part of the biggest overhaul of the U.S. intelligence system in a half century.

Some intelligence experts said the White House had been having trouble finding the right candidate for the job, suggesting it was too ill-defined and would take all the blame for any intelligence failures. Robert Gates, CIA director under former President Bush, publicly turned it down.

STRUGGLES AHEAD

The new director could face struggles similar to those confronted by the Department of Homeland Security, also created in response to the Sept. 11 attacks and which has struggled to combine a number of different government agencies.

Bush made clear that he expected the new intelligence chief to have power over the sometimes competing spy agencies and would have authority to order the collection of new intelligence and ensure information-sharing.

"It will be John's responsibility to determine the annual budgets for all national intelligence agencies and offices and to direct how these funds are spent," Bush said.

"Vesting these in a single official who reports directly to me will make our intelligence efforts better coordinated, more efficient and more effective," he said.

Bush also defined how he saw the new intelligence chief interacting with the CIA and the Pentagon.

The director of the CIA would report to Negroponte and the spy agency would retain its core responsibilities for collecting intelligence using spies and analyzing information from various sources.

Bush sought to assure the Pentagon, which gave up some budget powers with the creation of the new job, that it will still be able to get its job done.

"Our military commanders will continue to have quick access to the intelligence they need to achieve victory on the battlefield," Bush said.

One of the biggest setbacks for Negroponte in his previous post at the United Nations was failure to obtain Security Council approval of Bush's plan to invade Iraq in March 2003.

Among his successes in that job were resolutions adopted after the invasion that gave the United States total control over post-war construction and Iraqi oil proceeds. (Additional reporting by Steve Holland)

© Reuters 2005. All Rights Reserved.

mburbank
Feb 17th, 2005, 04:33 PM
Thanks, Zig; Prior to the article you posted I cpouldn't find anything on if the post W was naming negroponte for required confirmation. I'm glad to see it does.

I certainly hope there will be a huge fucking uproar. I think apointing a criminal who only stayed out of jail due to a pardon by Bush senior would raise a flag. When you concider his crime was lying to congress, you'd hope congress might have a problem with him.

In addition, the very idea of a democracy czar who was an apologist for some of the worst human rights excesses of the eighties makes me want to puke.

This slimy reptile is so Neocon he makes other Neocons loo like socialist youth campers.

kellychaos
Feb 17th, 2005, 05:14 PM
Does this mean that our president will actually be attending scheduled intelligence briefings? New and improved Geroge Bush ... now with scrubbing bubbles!

KevinTheOmnivore
Feb 17th, 2005, 06:29 PM
I certainly hope there will be a huge fucking uproar. I think apointing a criminal who only stayed out of jail due to a pardon by Bush senior would raise a flag. When you concider his crime was lying to congress, you'd hope congress might have a problem with him.

OH YEAH!? WELL CLINTON LIED TOO, AND HE LIED ABOUT SOMETHING MUCH WORSE....BLOW JOBS!

Cosmo Electrolux
Feb 17th, 2005, 09:40 PM
personally, I'd rather have a president that enjoyed the occasional blowjob than these neocon fucks who only lust money, power and death.

mburbank
Feb 18th, 2005, 12:29 PM
Man, I was so mad yesterday I just assumed this article was about The new Democracy Czar, Elliot Ahbrams.

Most of the shit I said was about him.

Shit.

It's so hard to tell your resurected Bush Senior bags of shit without a scorecard.

kellychaos
Feb 18th, 2005, 05:19 PM
Not defending Bush here but why does every argument against Bush end up being a pro-Clinton jag? It's an apples-and-oranges, red-herring way to argue and I find it pathetic. I mean, most of the same members of the the intelligence community have been around for at least a few administrations ... including Clinton's. That being said, although I'm not totally on board with Ward What's-his-face's (Colorado professor) argument, I do believe there is a little truth in that a few Reagan chickens have come to roost as of late. Just sayin'

KevinTheOmnivore
Feb 18th, 2005, 09:27 PM
Not defending Bush here but why does every argument against Bush end up being a pro-Clinton jag?

It was a joke. Lighten up. I didn't intend to be "pro-Clinton" or whatever.

jag.

kellychaos
Feb 19th, 2005, 05:23 PM
I knew that you meant it sarcastically and I didn't mean you specifically but it's just that I hear/see that kind of thing a lot. Instead of talking specifically about the issues at-hand and dealing specifically with them, a lot of people want to make it into a partisan rant. It's really non-constructive.