PDA

View Full Version : JACKSON JURY WILL DELIVER VERDICT AT 4:30! Place your bets


mburbank
Jun 13th, 2005, 04:53 PM
I'm betting they find him not guilty.

The standard for conviction is 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

I think there was plenty of room for doubt here. I mean, if you pass on molesting Macauly Culkin, why would you grope a white trash cancer patient?

MetalMilitia
Jun 13th, 2005, 04:55 PM
I heard a good joke the other day...

Whats the difference between Micheal Jackson and Neil Armstrong?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
One was the first man on the moon, the other fucks kids.

:lol:

executioneer
Jun 13th, 2005, 05:07 PM
good one

ziggytrix
Jun 13th, 2005, 05:18 PM
did you fuck up that punchline on purpose?

Emu
Jun 13th, 2005, 05:25 PM
Not guilty.

AChimp
Jun 13th, 2005, 05:49 PM
I think they'll find him guilty of being a freak.

FS
Jun 13th, 2005, 05:58 PM
One was the first man on the moon, the other fucks kids.

I'm not going to say anything. I'm just going to quote this as a testament to fuckuppery.

sspadowsky
Jun 13th, 2005, 06:12 PM
Not Guilty across the board. Was this the same jury that presided over OJ's trial?

darkvare
Jun 13th, 2005, 06:15 PM
GUILTY!! :maul

Rongi
Jun 13th, 2005, 06:17 PM
i KNEW they wouldnt find him guilty

somewhere, erikakrystal is cheering

Emu
Jun 13th, 2005, 06:22 PM
Who?

ziggytrix
Jun 13th, 2005, 06:31 PM
Some crazy bitch who used to come round here who apparently liked erotic fiction featuring Michael Jackson or somesuch shit.

executioneer
Jun 13th, 2005, 06:37 PM
dude idk, she might still be stinging too much from that mustaching that mustache bandit gave her to cheer :/

eggyolk
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:03 PM
:eek NOT GUILTY :eek

Guitar Woman
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:26 PM
He's not guilty. WHAT. >:
http://news.yahoo.com/fc/entertainment/michael_jackson

Emu
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:28 PM
"Not guilty" is Greek for "he paid us," right Helm?

Guitar Woman
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:29 PM
Rofl

ziggytrix
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:37 PM
I love how everyone has an opinion about this as though they were one of the jurors. Tell me, my consumerwhore friends, what media trainwreck are we gonna rubberneck now that this one is done?

Guitar Woman
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:40 PM
Your mother. :lol

Chojin
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:41 PM
I think Michael has some issues with wanting to hang out with kids, and I think certain parents use that to try and weasel money out of him. Based on my uneducated opinions, I'm glad he won the day.

Guitar Woman
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:45 PM
I'm not. It would have been funny to hear about what happened to him in prison. :D

Chojin
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:48 PM
People on the internet are so mean.

Guitar Woman
Jun 13th, 2005, 08:51 PM
At least we're not pedophiles.

Most of us, anyway :/

Chojin
Jun 13th, 2005, 09:03 PM
Oh please. He's working as hard as he can to find the real rapists.

Emu
Jun 13th, 2005, 09:05 PM
QUICK, SOMEBODY MAKE A CATHOLIC PRIEST JOKE

James
Jun 13th, 2005, 09:18 PM
i KNEW they wouldnt find him guilty

somewhere, erikakrystal is cheering

Why would she cheer? Being a child herself, I thought she'd want to know Michael would be up for the touchin's.

And if you never saw it; http://download.ifilm.com/qt/portal/2672935_300.mov

Triumph at the Michael Jackson trial.

Schimid
Jun 13th, 2005, 09:37 PM
I don't have enough knowledge in the case to have an opinion either way, but I was betting on him being found guilty. In a way, I'm extremely glad to see I was wrong.

I really wish he would've jumped up from the chair and done the "a-hee-hee!"

Lotida
Jun 13th, 2005, 09:44 PM
I don't have enough knowledge in the case to have an opinion either way, but I was betting on him being found guilty. In a way, I'm extremely glad to see I was wrong.

I really wish he would've jumped up from the chair and done the "a-hee-hee!"

DITTO!

soundtest
Jun 13th, 2005, 10:52 PM
I'm glad he was found innocent, although I'm pretty confident this will not stop until he is bankrupt. As creepy as it is, I think he just sincerely likes hanging out with children and, like Chojin said, some greedy parents want to cash in on his interest in their children.

Those parents should be charged with willingly putting their children in potential harm's way though. Innocent or not, there's no way I'd let my child spend the night with some eccentric Peter Pan freak.

executioneer
Jun 13th, 2005, 11:07 PM
i really hope this thread gets about ten more pages

Mockery
Jun 13th, 2005, 11:51 PM
Me too Willie, me too... I mean, I dunno about you, but my life just hasn't been saturated with enough Michael Jackson trial coverage. I need MORE!

*I'll move this to the news forum soon...

executioneer
Jun 13th, 2005, 11:52 PM
what is this 'news forum' you speak of

Mockery
Jun 13th, 2005, 11:54 PM
Seek and ye shall find (http://www.i-mockery.net/viewforum.php?f=5) :posh

Archduke Tips
Jun 14th, 2005, 12:42 AM
Haha! Didn't move it fast enough, now this thread has the CAPTAIN OF THE WELSHMAN seal of approval.

ScruU2wice
Jun 14th, 2005, 12:59 AM
wait does this mean by double jeopardy he can molest the hell out of little kids now with out worrying about it at all?

Chojin
Jun 14th, 2005, 01:06 AM
Double Jeopardy deals with the same crime. Molesting one boy isn't the same crime as molesting a different one.

Bell E. Laffs
Jun 14th, 2005, 03:10 AM
Hahaha, so the player got played.

Geggy
Jun 14th, 2005, 10:42 AM
why isnt there a riot going on i guess michael jacksoin isnt white enough haha

guerss what? i dont care

Geggy
Jun 14th, 2005, 01:54 PM
Earthquake in chile scaled at 7.1
Blast in iraq wounded 7 US soldiers

And who makes the cover of today's boston herald?

Come on guys this is an easy one

That's right michael motherfucking jackson

Bunch of buttfucking son of a biotches

kellychaos
Jun 14th, 2005, 02:25 PM
Those parents should be charged with willingly putting their children in potential harm's way though. Innocent or not, there's no way I'd let my child spend the night with some eccentric Peter Pan freak.

That was one of the first sentiments I've heard out of one of the juror's mouths after the verdict. Granted, it's not a wise parental choice for her to have let her child stay with MJ. Perhaps she WAS trying to weasel money out of him. Also evil but, at the same time, not germane as to what the jury was trying to decide. You have to ask yourself why YOU think it was unwise that she let her children stay with MJ, the mother's motives notwithstanding. The only question, regardless of the mother's motive, past history, ect is whether MJ did these things or not. That was what this case was all about. As obviously, I was not there to hear the testimony, I hope that they rendered their verdict on reasonable doubt of MJ's activities rather than the mother's character. To me, her character is irrelevant. Amidtedly, from the snippets I heard from the prosecution's case, it did sound rather weak. After hearing the brief comments of the jurors following the reading of the verdict; however, many of them DID come off sounding like a bunch of "Corkies".

P.S. Many lawyers preceding the verdict were in agreement that, when deliberation is unduly long, chances are in more than likely in favor of the defendant in the form of a "hung jury" or outright acquittal so I can't say that I was really suprised by the outcome.

GAsux
Jun 14th, 2005, 04:17 PM
I think they're all crazy and should have gone to jail together. Mike, the parents, the kids, all of em.

But anyway, I agree with Blanco a little there. It seems everyone says the same thing about how the parents should be sent to jail for letting their kids there in the first place. AS nutty and shaddy as mom and dad are, on principle alone if Mike is innocent and harmless, why should the parents be blamed?

I guess its kind of like blaming a hot chick for being raped instead of the rapist. After all, she is hot, what does she expect?

I'm just glad it's done. And I'm slightly aroused at the thought of the party that must going on at Mike's house this week.

Yggdrasill
Jun 14th, 2005, 05:36 PM
Jackson's lawyer says no more boys are invited to stay in his bedroom.
“He’s not going to do that anymore,” Mesereau said. “He’s not going to make himself vulnerable to this anymore.”

So I guess he will keep the temptation away praise the Lord

kellychaos
Jun 15th, 2005, 11:53 AM
That's not Silly String, Billy! :(