Worst Top 100 List EVER

[Ninjavenom]

Rolling Stone and MTV (http://www.muchmusic.net/100_Greatest_Pop_Songs_Since_1963_WMA_Download) recently posted this top 100 list of "the greatest pop songs since 1963". One problem i know at least Dole and will have noticed: One Beach Boys song. At number SEVENTY. HANSON attained a higher rank on the list. "Experts" my fucking cock. This list just confirms my suspicion that in order to work for MTV or Rolling Stone, you need to have the worst taste in music EVER.

[Emu]

They try to make it so people aren't biased towards a particular group, no matter how much ass they kick, because they're idiots. After all, we wouldn't want a bunch of Beatles songs up there, would we? That would be rude. :rolleyes

[Dole]

Well that list is a bag o'shite. But then I don't have any faith in popular opinion.

[Immortal Goat]

When Britney Spears and Hanson get higher on the list than Bohenian Fucking Rhapsody, that is where I draw the line. I used to not care about MTV or Rolling Stone, but now I harbor a hatred of them deep in my loins that will not go away.

[Bobo Adobo]

I love how they chose the year 1963. Because everyone knows music didn't exist before the beatles got together. :rolleyes

[Jim Duncan - Weather]

Ricky Nelson should have been on that list. >:

[EverythingWillSuck]

Biz Markie should be higher >:

[Zebra 3]

Starting the list at 1963 would exclude many of Elvis Presley's most popular songs, which is yet another reason why MTV sucks.

[The Unseen]

Let's start our own list (for 100 worst)
I'll start

1) eminem
2) aerosmith
3) guns and roses
4) U2

[Girl Drink Drunk]

Let's start our own list (for 100 worst)
I'll start

1) eminem
2) aerosmith
3) guns and roses
4) U2

aerosmith, guns and roses, and U2? Fuck you, man! >:

[Immortal Goat]

I must concur. How dare you put Guns n' Roses on that list. Aerosmith is slightly less deserving of being on that list, and I can take or leave U2.

[Big Papa Goat]

no, they all suck >: