Log in

View Full Version : For the people that are too shallow to care about war....


VinceZeb
Mar 23rd, 2003, 06:20 PM
http://www.drudgereport.com/md323.htm

Look at this, keep trying to bring up the picture.... and then, after that, if you still don't care about what goes on in our world, please do the world a favor and jump off a high-rise building.

Protoclown
Mar 23rd, 2003, 06:27 PM
I think that to suggest that you wish harm to befall those people who don't care about the war is even WORSE than someone who displays complete apathy about it. I'll take the apathy over malicious intent (or wishing, in this case), it's the lesser of two evils.

Yes, I think it's fucking pathetic that there are American citizens who don't give a flying fuck about this war, or more to the point: that they don't care about PEOPLE DYING (their own countrymen, even, as if that should give it more weight).

But if someone hasn't cared up to this point, then they're not going to care if they see this. The ONLY thing that can make those people care is if someone they KNOW dies as a result of this war, and that kind of blase selfishness digusts me to the core of my being. I still don't bear any ill will toward them or wish any harm befall them, foolish though they may be.

VinceZeb
Mar 23rd, 2003, 06:32 PM
I agree/disagree with you, Proto. I dont want those people to die, I am just being dramatic. It is a message board and all and words do mean things, but I dont want to seem like I want a mass-suicide to happen.

But I bring it up because some guy on her, James something, was saying that he didnt care whatsoever. I then informed him he was a worthless sheeple puppet and went off. I can understand if people agree/disagree with war, but not to care about our troops is disgusting. Like the guy, Ying Sung Chung King throw some pots down a flight of stairs (yes, very racist remark, I do know) who led the SF protests on Thursday who said he would rather see soliders die from the US then Iraqi citizens. Well I guess he got his wish.

Protoclown
Mar 23rd, 2003, 06:49 PM
who said he would rather see soliders die from the US then Iraqi citizens.

I don't think you'll find a single person on here that will disagree on the point that that is a HORRIBLE statement for someone to have made. I vehemently disagree with that sentiment and would prefer to see NO ONE die at all. I weigh all human life the same. I cannot say I would "rather" see an Iraqi citizen die than a US soldier, even though I have friends in the military. To me, that is JUST as bad as what this man said.

The only thing I would "rather" see is that nobody die in this conflict at all, but that is not possible.

Jeanette X
Mar 23rd, 2003, 09:12 PM
I can understand if people agree/disagree with war, but not to care about our troops is disgusting.

Amen to that!

The_Rorschach
Mar 23rd, 2003, 11:21 PM
" I weigh all human life the same." -Proto

All human life post-natum you mean.

Everyone has a choice Proto, and to be honest, I would rather see those whom are willing to sacrifice themselves and others in support of a tyrannical institution die as opposed to those who are willing to sacrifice of themselves to end it.

Protoclown
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:21 AM
And what about the innocent civilian who just happens to get caught in a bomb blast?

As for the abortion issue, Rorshach, I am still pro-life on a personal level. After a great deal of thinking however, I have realized that politically, I had to change and become pro-choice. Because I honestly believed that in certain situations (rape, where the mother would die, etc) it WAS okay, I realized that you can't have it both ways. You can't pick and choose...condone "murder" in certain situations and condemn it in others. Where does one draw the line, after all? Any distinction would have to be rather arbitrary in nature, and there will never be agreement over it. It's all or nothing, and to continue to remain wishy-washy over the issue made me a hypocrite, in my own estimation. I'm having a debate about this very thing with VinceZeb in another thread, and I'm using the same realization that I had to try to illustrate to him that there is no such thing as a black and white morality. Only in theory, not in practice. The world isn't nearly so clean or precise.

I still abhor abortion as an after-the-fact method of birth control, I find that to be an utterly vile act resulting from the worst sort of irresponsibility. HOWEVER, I believe that the law has to protect the right of other people to make their own personal choices, whether I agree with them or not. Who am I to say that abortion is okay in SOME situations but not others? What gives ME that authority? These are decisions that we each have to make for ourselves and live with the consequences.

We will NEVER know the exact moment life begins because we cannot agree on a DEFINITION of terms. Maybe it IS murdering a being with a soul, maybe it is not. It depends on when you think that being of pure potential actually becomes a real person. This is something there IS no scientific measure for, and there never will be. I only know that I would consider it horrible to doom a mother to almost certain death or force her to carry a baby that is the result of rape because of laws that make abortion illegal in ANY situation.

So I stand by the right to abortion. I may not agree with it in every circumstance, but I do not believe it is MY place to enforce my own personal definitions of life on others, or to influence their decisions.

So I would still say that I respect all human life, regardless of how you may disagree.

The_Rorschach
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:36 AM
"And what about the innocent civilian who just happens to get caught in a bomb blast? "

Collateral damage. Innocence is arbitrary, if not non-existant.


"As for the abortion issue, Rorshach, I am still pro-life on a personal level. After a great deal of thinking however, I have realized that politically, I had to change and become pro-choice."

Less than .16%, and I'll cite the statistic if need be, I have it at the top of my head because I used it recently but its somewhere in my notes and I'd have to dig, of all abortions are cited as due to rape/incest, deformation or complications. Even if this was justification enough for me to support abortion, which it isn't (at least for myself), the figures hardly make a convincing case for the practise.

"These are decisions that we each have to make for ourselves and live with the consequences. "

Its never easy to live with a grave mistake, unfortunately, abortion makes it very easy to kill with one.

I didn't mean to change the subject, or draw fire on your views. I was just trying to muddy the waters a bit. Everyone has a little blood on their hands, and the moral highground is just a matter of perspective. Iraqi's are going to die, but I know our military - They will only be killed if they fight, and hopefully, they will only fight if they support Hussein. That makes things rest a little easier in my mind.

Protoclown
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:52 AM
"And what about the innocent civilian who just happens to get caught in a bomb blast? "

Collateral damage. Innocence is arbitrary, if not non-existant.

I agree with you on the point of innocence, actually. Poor choice of wording on my part, I should have said "uninvolved".

Also, I am well aware of the fact that there are VERY few pregnancies that fall into those categories. No need to post any statistics, I've seen figures myself and I believe you. But in my opinion, few though they may be, the law should allow for these "exception to the rule" type cases. I don't believe there's ANY rule there aren't exceptions to.

I will NEVER turn a blind eye to abortion and simply dismiss it as something not to be concerned with. I feel sad for every single one of those aborted babies, and I have heard stories about what the mothers who make the decision to abort go through, wracked with guilt and nightmares for the rest of their lives in many cases. It is NOT a light decision for anyone, REGARDLESS of whether or not they think it is murder.

But I stand by the right for them to do it, it's a decision I reached after much consideration, I was a staunch pro-lifer for years, I didn't just turn a complete 180 overnight. Abortion makes me sad, and I think many of those who do it will regret it or be haunted by it for the rest of their lives. But the FREEDOM to choose is what makes this country so great, whether we agree with the choice or not.

Believe me, Rorshach, I'm not saying our military are a bunch of bastards for going out and killing people who have guns pointed at them. I have a lot of friends in the military, and they have my complete support. People will die in this war, I understand and accept that. But I will express and feel sadness over the loss of ALL life in this conflict, regardless of alliegiances.

The_Rorschach
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:36 AM
I'm failing to see where we're in a disagreement on anything. . .I think I'll just concede the argument now before I lose anymore ground ;)

James
Mar 24th, 2003, 02:56 AM
The real question:

Should I even bother to click Vinnie's link? :/

Look, I don't care about the war. I don't care about soldiers dying. If I had things my way, there wouldn't even be a war. But I'm not going to protest or promote the actions taken by our country. If that makes me a bad person, than tough shit.

Think about this: In the time it took for me to write that above paragraph, how many people - out of the 6-billion in the world - died? Do you know? Do you know who they are? They're not in the news, or casualties of war, so they must not matter. If I'm going to care about people who I don't know dying, then why single out those who are newsworthy? And more to the point, if I worried about everyone and everything that dies in the world, I would have gone completely insane years ago.

You can't pick and choose. If you care about soldiers dying, why not everyone else? If it's because they're serving their country, then why do you feel the need to support those fighting in a war most of you were against? If you feel it's the patriotic thing to do, then why is it only convenient to be patriotic in times of crisis?

Like I said, I was fooled by 9/11. They're not going to make me care again.

In other words, we're all hypocrites in some way or another. But rather than trying to double-talk my way out of being one with excuses and bullshit reasons like so many people, I'd just prefer to say, "You know what? Fuck it?" (And no, that wasn't an attack on anyone to my knowledge. Just a general statement).

Protoclown
Mar 24th, 2003, 07:17 AM
How were you "fooled" by 9/11 exactly?

This isn't the same kind of thing where you were "fooled" by love, is it? :rolleyes

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 09:54 AM
So basically you are saying you are a Nihilist, correct?

By your way of thinking, I could go and murder your family, and, by your own admission, you wouldn't give a shit.

Yes, people do die everyday, but most days they are not attacked by Islamic fundies via fuel loaded airplane.


If you have nothing that you would fight or die for.... you are a pretty shallow and pathetic person. I'm sorry. I wish I had the nice quote that sums it up a lot better than I could.

James
Mar 24th, 2003, 11:17 AM
Ah, so little Vinny is one of those people who don't know how to read. :rolleyes Rather that try to explain myself to Ronnie Jr, I'll address Proto instead.

Proto, what I mean is, everyone "banded together" after 9/11. It seemed like it was going to last. But not long after, we started having stupid little things as people attacking Muslims in America and whatnot.

That's what I mean. I was fooled into thinking that Patriotism meant something after I saw what happened post-9/11. But then it died off rather quickly, and things turned ugly again. Patriotism is just a crock of shit, only convenient for a week or two during a crisis. So I'm just not going to buy into that shit, and just sit here talking to you guys instead of whimpering like a little bitch over some sand monkeys and rednecks shooting each other up.

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 11:37 AM
I can read. I'm sorry that you are an idiot. If you were not a worthless bag of shit, I would respond to you like a normal person gets responded to, such as I do with others on this board.

But since your picture should be next to to the word 'worthless' in the dictionary, you are not worth the time or energy necessary to type another word about your pathetic sheeple existance.

mburbank
Mar 24th, 2003, 11:47 AM
I find it ironic that you are 'sorry' Jamesman is an idiot, and yet NOT sorry that he is a 'worthless bag of shit'.

It is you, YOU sir, who are Sheeple!

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 11:58 AM
Yep, I'm sheeple alright. :blah

Actually, I'm sorry for his whole easily-replaceable existance.

mburbank
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:01 PM
" But since your picture should be next to to the word 'worthless' in the dictionary, you are not worth the time or energy necessary to type another word about your pathetic sheeple existance."
- Vince"Sheeple"Zeb

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:07 PM
Wow max, your just so funny and great. I'm suprised you didn't get a special Oscar last night just for being you. Because who would care if Max Burbank suddenly does not exist on the planet Earth? Everyone. The whole world would shut down, people would not go to work, the economy would tank to the Great Depression II and the cults of Max would commit mass suicide.

mburbank
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:12 PM
YOU SHEEPLE SON OF A BITCH! I'LL SHEEPLE YOU, YOU SHEEPLE SHEEPLE! SHEEPLE!

James
Mar 24th, 2003, 12:59 PM
People like Vinnie are why I tend to shy away from getting seriously involved here.

See, I was actually going for a serious response on this whole subject. But Vinnie Raygun here feels that as long as someone doesn't share his opinions, or is proven to be a complete dipshit, it is valid to respond with "your a worthless piece of shit and your existence isn't needed etc etc etc..."

Now while that's all good and fine if we were discussing what flavor jellybean is the best, it just goes to show how much of a pompous dipshit you are because you can't give any opinions that aren't copied and pasted from some obscure news website.

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:02 PM
Wow, I'll have to respond since you made a halfway serious point.

Actually, the information I get my sources from are some of the highest ranking political sites, let alone sites in total, on the internet. The people I quote have spent their lives in politics and on the front lines. They also are on many different news programs and channels.

No, if you dont share my opinion, you are misinformed. If you are a complete dipshit, than you are that, but your statement led the board to believe you really dont care about the world around you. That, in my oh so humble opinion, is pathetic. If you would have never made your topic statement, I wouldn't have a reason to call you that.

Protoclown
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:09 PM
if you dont share my opinion, you are misinformed

Wow! What a GREAT quote! I think I have a new signature! :lol

James
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:12 PM
Proto, please tell me Vinnie was joking just there. I can't believe it was that easy.

Anonymous
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:13 PM
Why do you think I come here so often?

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:16 PM
I don't see how that statement was that big of a deal. Isn't that and shouldn't that be the belief of EVERYONE? If someone doesnt agree with me, I believe they are misinformed. If I dont agree with someone, they would believe I am misinformed. You are grasping for a diamond in a pile of coal.

Anonymous
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:18 PM
"Dur? Doesn't everyone believe that?"

IF THEY DID, WHY WOULD ANYONE DISAGREE WITH YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE? YOU MUST BE A MORON.

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:23 PM
You didn't even answer the question or try to make a supporting statement for or against what I said.

James
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:27 PM
So in other words, he was doing a REALLY GREAT impression of you. :(

VinceZeb
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:42 PM
Not really, if he was going to do an impression of myself, he would have argued the point or at least give a reason to support or not support my statement. For all the shit I talk, I do at least answer the relavant questions that are of substance and not of a baiting nature.

Anonymous
Mar 24th, 2003, 01:48 PM
Or maybe I should have included the misguided thinking that all of those things were an integral part of mimicking myself while mimicking you. To get the whole package.

Or maybe you should shut up and let it drop.

Maybe.

Jeanette X
Mar 24th, 2003, 03:16 PM
I don't see how that statement was that big of a deal. Isn't that and shouldn't that be the belief of EVERYONE? If someone doesnt agree with me, I believe they are misinformed. If I dont agree with someone, they would believe I am misinformed. You are grasping for a diamond in a pile of coal.

While I hold strong opinions on issues, I try to be humble enough to accept the possibility that I might be wrong and someone else might be right.

Do you consider it a possibility that perhaps you are the one who is misinformed?

The_Rorschach
Mar 24th, 2003, 03:24 PM
"People like Vinnie are why I tend to shy away from getting seriously involved here."

Vinnie, to my admittedly limited knowledge, has been here less than six weeks. You have been here almost a year. The reason you don't venture into this forum is because you have no ideaology. From what I've read of your posts, you don't particularly care about any issue enough to take a stand one way or the other. While most people lack the courage of their conviction, you lack any conviction whatsoever. Not a critique, just an observation.

James
Mar 24th, 2003, 03:26 PM
Vinnie, to my admittedly limited knowledge, has been here less than six weeks.

But how long has his dad (Ronnie) been here? ;)

The_Rorschach
Mar 24th, 2003, 03:33 PM
For fucks sake, since before me, and I came around 00' or '01. But Ronnie, for the most part, is easily disregarded. He does his little snip and past posts, or comes up with a vague responce that sounds vaguely Baptist in structure (KIN I GIT AN AMEN BUuuuusssSSSHHHHAH!). . .

Having said that, point taken.

Protoclown
Mar 24th, 2003, 05:35 PM
Isn't that and shouldn't that be the belief of EVERYONE? If someone doesnt agree with me, I believe they are misinformed. If I dont agree with someone, they would believe I am misinformed. You are grasping for a diamond in a pile of coal.

This five-year-old's view of the world you posess explains much about the rest of your posts.

VinceZeb
Mar 25th, 2003, 01:31 AM
That's not a five year old's opinion, that is basic truth. If you disagree with me, to me, you are misinformed or dillusional to the facts I present. If I disagree with you, then I am misinformed or dillusional to the facts you present. Those are and should be the opinions of people with convictions. And I love how you never agreed/disagreed with the points, you just tried once again to insult me.

Protoclown
Mar 25th, 2003, 07:31 AM
No, I honestly believe that's a childish way to view the world. I have conviction to my beliefs, but I also accept that my opinions are just that...OPINIONS, and not necessarily any more or less valid than those of the next person. I have my unique way of viewing the world, just as you have yours. Doesn't necessarily mean either one of us is right or wrong. I'm always glad to argue or debate my side, but I'm always aware of the POSSIBILITY that I could be wrong.

You keep going back to this extreme oversimplification of everything. It doesn't all come down to black and white.

VinceZeb
Mar 25th, 2003, 08:48 AM
No, truths are truths. There are only truths and lies. It's the truth that we breath air. Everyone cany deny it, but that doesn't make it true. You have the idea that looking at the world through an unfiltered prism is just so neat and special. Don't be open-minded enough that your mind fills with trash. I look through everything with a filtered prism based on what I assume to be true. So thats why when I said if you disagree with me, you are misinformed.

Protoclown
Mar 25th, 2003, 12:35 PM
I look through everything with a filtered prism based on what I assume to be true. So thats why when I said if you disagree with me, you are misinformed.

This is another stellar quote from VinceZeb! I think I'm going to start a collection in my signature...I'm just worried that it's going to get too big.

VinceZeb
Mar 25th, 2003, 12:49 PM
Good for you. In 20 years when you finally decide to grow up, you will have a record of quotes that were uttered by people you probably should take a gander at.

If that be the case, then also start a scrapbook of all the direct questions and posts that you chose not to answer directly, but just decided to act cute and make jokes about the person that confronted you about your statements. Make sure the book is prefaced with the fact that you avoided most of my questions and when you answered some, you truly didn't answer them, but gave a sweeping generalization not about the point made, but about the person delivering it.

Protoclown
Mar 25th, 2003, 01:00 PM
Gee, I'm so sorry VinceZeb, but since you don't agree with me, I kind of figured you were misinformed and decided that since you just don't "get it", you're probably not worth talking to. :rolleyes

VinceZeb
Mar 25th, 2003, 01:20 PM
Proto, all I would like you to do is argue the statement I made about people's opinions and the facts that they believe back them up. Put up your arguemnt about why I am wrong. If you convince me that I am wrong, then I will reevaluate or change my views.

James
Mar 25th, 2003, 01:48 PM
Shut up, you misinformed sheeple. We're right, and you're just wrong, you waste of human life.

Anonymous
Mar 25th, 2003, 02:37 PM
Vince, by your own convoluted logic, Proto cannot convince you that you're wrong because "[you] look through everything with a filtered prism based on what [you] assume to be true."

Protoclown
Mar 25th, 2003, 05:53 PM
Truly, how could one with a "misinformed opinion" such as myself ever POSSIBLY get through to you? It is an exercise in futility.

kellychaos
Mar 25th, 2003, 06:16 PM
While I hold strong opinions on issues, I try to be humble enough to accept the possibility that I might be wrong and someone else might be right.

Do you consider it a possibility that perhaps you are the one who is misinformed?

That's very Socratic of you ... and I agree. The wisest people are those that maintain an open mind and continue to question everything ... even themselves. :)

mburbank
Mar 25th, 2003, 06:25 PM
"Put up your arguemnt about why I am wrong. If you convince me that I am wrong, then I will reevaluate or change my views."

So, wait, let me see if I follow this simple, black and white logic.

You think A. Proto thinks B.

You think Proto is 'missinformed and/or dellusional'.

Then Proto convinces you of B. You now think B as well.

Ergo, when you thought Proto was missinformed and/or dellusional, it was actually you who were missinformed and/or dellusional.

How about incoporating the possibility that you might be wrong or simply interpret certain facts differently than Proto (or anyone) into your original point of view?

This would
A.) Make you less obnoxious.
B.) Open your mind to the existence of other viewpoints and the possability of their validity, thus making change and learning morte likely.
C.) Introduce Doubt into your equation, without which ones life remains unexamined.

Here's a question to test your black and white we breathe air theory. Are you good?
Answer yes or no. It's that simple. End of story. Black and White.

Jeanette X
Mar 25th, 2003, 08:40 PM
That's very Socratic of you ... and I agree. The wisest people are those that maintain an open mind and continue to question everything ... even themselves. :)

Aw shucks. Thank you. I try to live up what Socrates said as best I can.

VinceZeb
Mar 25th, 2003, 08:55 PM
Am I good? I assume you mean between good and evil, am I good?

The question itself is a loaded one, becuase there are many benchmarks for good that I personally follow, but I would say yes I am good.

Jeanette X
Mar 25th, 2003, 10:25 PM
Am I good? I assume you mean between good and evil, am I good?

The question itself is a loaded one, becuase there are many benchmarks for good that I personally follow, but I would say yes I am good.

Is the above post directed at me, or to someone else? Or I am I just confused?

mburbank
Mar 26th, 2003, 03:17 PM
Don't be confused. He's responding to me.

So you feel that question isn't so simple as we haven't yet agreed on terms? And that even if we had there are many benchmarks? But that given that on par you'd say you were good? In your own estimation?

I don't know. That sounds pretty vague to me. I mean, things are black and white at the end of the day, right? Dead or alive, right or wrong, I'm right or your right?

I mean, granted, that was a pretty complicated question, nothing so simple as is this war good, should one whole country wage war gainst another whole country when both those countries exist in a world full of countries all of which have their own interests and are populated by individuals with interests and all these things are tied tighter together than the straw in a birds nest.

VinceZeb
Mar 27th, 2003, 12:54 AM
When it comes down to it, I have to answer to God in the endgame. If God knows I am good, then I am. If he knows I'm bad, I am bad.

James
Mar 27th, 2003, 01:02 AM
How unfortunate for you that I am God.

VinceZeb
Mar 27th, 2003, 07:56 AM
Whatever you say, geek.

Must be hard living a shallow existance with your 3 friends and the stomach that laps over your dick. You would probably have a better sense of reality if you actually seen a pair of tits in real life.

It's nice out side, get some sun!

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 27th, 2003, 07:56 AM
I would like you to know i have seen many topics here and you are a very shallow person much more the most fagoty and dipshiity

As 4 protoclow i apologize i use to think you were shallow and careless but i see different now its nice to know you apreciate and care about the troops too.

I am for bush and his recent choices he needs AND DESERVES all our support its not his fault 9-1-1 happened

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 27th, 2003, 08:01 AM
That first paragraph was for james man

FS
Mar 27th, 2003, 10:23 AM
Your contribution is appreciated, Motherbrain.

James
Mar 27th, 2003, 12:14 PM
This is exactly as how I intended my (God's) plan to go. :)

ItalianStereotype
Mar 27th, 2003, 12:15 PM
if Gothypoo is on our side, we are sure to win :)


i think i might switch sides :(

VinceZeb
Mar 27th, 2003, 12:39 PM
I HIGLY doubt he will become a pinko leftie anytime soon...

Protoclown
Mar 27th, 2003, 12:43 PM
Who?? GothNaPrepsBody? Know him well, do you?

VinceZeb
Mar 27th, 2003, 01:03 PM
Nope. Not at all. I guess he just joined today. All I know is from what he told me in a PM about people disrespecting the memories of his grandfather who died in war. WWII, I believe.

Protoclown
Mar 27th, 2003, 01:04 PM
Oh, okay. Because for a minute, I thought maybe you were saying that God wouldn't become a pinko leftie any time soon.

James
Mar 27th, 2003, 08:06 PM
Yeah, I don't recall Gothypoo every mentioning anything about who he is or where he came from. More importantly, you'd think someone would see when someone registered before saying "I guess he just joined today." Suspicious.

Maybe someone should see if the IPs match. ;)

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 28th, 2003, 07:00 AM
Try this James Fag. Ive Been Registered for a month or two now not "a day" And i think your the biggest shit fucker here so take that doll and shove it up your ass. If it gets cought because of the screw i reccomend sitting.

VinceZeb
Mar 28th, 2003, 07:28 AM
Check the ISPs, idiot.

Protoclown
Mar 28th, 2003, 07:28 AM
Uhhhhhh...did you actually READ Jamesman's post or just look at the pretty picture?

VinceZeb
Mar 28th, 2003, 07:35 AM
Maybe someone should see if the IPs match.

I believe that is the end of the post he made. So, yeah, I think I did read it. You all were just made to look stupid again. Pretty funny, if I do say so myself.

Pub Lover
Mar 28th, 2003, 11:24 AM
Unless you think Proto has some sort of ESP, look at the times on the two posts & you'll see they are identical, so with a little use of the brain-muscle you can work out that he was talking to the GothGuy, not you. >:

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 28th, 2003, 11:39 AM
No actually i did read it dumb ass little proto I just dont give a shit what that faggot has to say.

Much less what you have to say and no we are not the same person

sspadowsky
Mar 28th, 2003, 11:41 AM
Who are you? And why are you so stupid?
________
Weed Vaporizer (http://weedvaporizer.info/)

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 28th, 2003, 12:24 PM
Because bumb ass holes like you are here sir

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 28th, 2003, 12:24 PM
Because bumb ass holes like you are here sir

sspadowsky
Mar 28th, 2003, 12:28 PM
Wow, post that some more. It's clever, and catchy. You can almost dance to it. Seriously.
________
Herbal vaporizers (http://herbalvaporizers.info)

Protoclown
Mar 28th, 2003, 12:44 PM
Vince, I can see where you might have made such a silly mistake, but I was talking to the little Goth wanna-be.

Sorry if you were "made to look stupid" as a result.

Vibecrewangel
Mar 28th, 2003, 12:46 PM
I am for bush and his recent choices he needs AND DESERVES all our support its not his fault 9-1-1 happened

No it isn't. It's OUR fault.

James
Mar 28th, 2003, 12:58 PM
Gothy-poo. I'm sure it was hard trying to read my post after you just poked yourself with your mascara brush, so I'll say it again.

Vince suggested you had just registered the other day. I then berated him for not taking the 3 seconds to check the date you registered right below your name. You then come by and show us all why we'd be better off herding all the Goths into concentration camps. That is all.

And Vince, I'd check your ISPs, but I don't think both of you using AOL is solid enough evidence. I stick by suggesting an IP check.

Protoclown
Mar 28th, 2003, 01:00 PM
Gothy doesn't understand basic concepts, that much is clear.

And Jamesman, I've checked their I.P.s, not to see if they were the same person, but just to see if either of them were characters when they first showed up.

Seems to be a "no" in both cases.

James
Mar 28th, 2003, 01:07 PM
I've pretty much given up on that, Proto. When some tard bumps into these boards, I immediately assume they're a character, because I hate to think people that stupid really exists (Gothy being a prime example. Look at his sig). But I've learned that that's always going to end in heartache once I realize that people that stupid are one day going to be running this country.

VinceZeb
Mar 28th, 2003, 07:23 PM
Yes, Jamesmen, we that run the country are stupid, becuase we go out and have to work to try and run the country, while you will sit on your geeky cum-stained chair and whine about how bad the world is.

If you don't like the world, GO OUT AND DO SOMETING ABOUT IT YOU WHINY LITTLE FUCK!

Anonymous
Mar 28th, 2003, 09:49 PM
...Unless you've got hives. Terminal ones. Well, kinda-bad ones.

mburbank
Mar 28th, 2003, 11:23 PM
"If you don't like the world, GO OUT AND DO SOMETING ABOUT IT YOU WHINY LITTLE FUCK!"

What, like protest the war and vote against this administration? Okay.

I love that you are now part of 'we that run this country'. I hope the burden is not to heavy for your ever less meaty shoulders.

GothNAPrepsBody
Mar 31st, 2003, 07:38 AM
"If you don't like the world go out and do something about it you winny little fuck"-Burbank

I like that.


Any way jamesman your right and wont it be days of hell for you once i am running it

Ecspecially when i take you off those food stamps.

VinceZeb
Mar 31st, 2003, 09:21 AM
It's just a second rate copy of yours truly. Wow, Max being second rate. Not suprising at all.

Anonymous
Mar 31st, 2003, 10:18 AM
...what?