PDA

View Full Version : Every economist ever is boring


Sethomas
Feb 10th, 2006, 07:51 PM
QED.

kahljorn
Feb 10th, 2006, 08:52 PM
I guess I'll be the first to ask how you came to that conclusion.

Sethomas
Feb 10th, 2006, 08:56 PM
The historical/neoclassical school of thought has no means of isolating variables in the same manner that physical scientists do, thus rendering much of its exertion useless.

The a priori/Austrian school of thought relies on Kantian philosophy to give their "axioms" validity (I reject Kant, remember?).

All that being said, Austrian axioms can be inferred with great sucess (if you truly need to organize an argument for them, use induction with reference to an ordinal model of chance). However, the fact that I admit that economic postulates are not necessarily true causes me to have some severe breaks with Austrian reasoning.

For example, Rothbard's attack on utilitarianism/consequentialism is based on the assertion that we are unable to know utility in any context outside of our mind. However, I argue that I can infer utility (from induction with reference to ordinal chance) with varying degrees of success. For example, while inferring the utility of Play-Doh for an individual might be difficult, inferring the utility of food and water in the condition of starvation is much more successful. Rothbard relies on absolutes; I rely on likelihood. That man hates to starve is not much less likely than man acts.

Again, QED.

Emu
Feb 10th, 2006, 10:13 PM
agree

homoperfect
Feb 25th, 2006, 09:35 PM
my experience from working for MaryP.I.R.G. is quite the oposite. Though there scientific explinations were dull and probablly could be placed to better use at the national sleep institute. I can't deny that they know how to party. Just be prepared to make a trip to the recycling Center the following morning.

KevinTheOmnivore
Feb 25th, 2006, 09:47 PM
PIRG sucks.

Preechr
Feb 25th, 2006, 10:49 PM
I thought their second album was pretty good, but after that they kinda just sold out, y'know.

ItalianStereotype
Feb 25th, 2006, 10:54 PM
hm, yes, but are they gay?

Preechr
Feb 25th, 2006, 10:58 PM
No. They are VERY Anti-Gay. It's actually a bit disturbing.

Maybe that's why he works for them. He is trying to change them from behind... or within... something like that.

MLE
Feb 25th, 2006, 10:59 PM
Preechr gets jokes.

homoperfect
Feb 26th, 2006, 02:03 AM
Yeeeah, I no longer work for them. Environmental lobbyist groups are composed mainly of liberal wack jobs such as myself. The specific group I was with was rather accepting. But not too boring. as I said, be prepared to make a trip to the recycling center the following morning.

Sethomas
Feb 26th, 2006, 10:40 PM
If you're trying to go for a Latin sn, I think it'd need to be "HomoPerfectus". Unless you're just a homo with bad English syntax.

homoperfect
Feb 27th, 2006, 08:17 AM
I was just trying to come up with a sn. I wasn't worried about the particulars.

ItalianStereotype
Feb 27th, 2006, 08:27 AM
I would've probably gone for something else. people might read your name and think that you're gay or something. :<