View Full Version : Judge orders no evidence in Moussaoui trial
Geggy
Mar 14th, 2006, 08:03 PM
ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (Reuters) - In a sharp blow to the U.S. government's only case connected to the September 11 hijackings, a federal judge on Tuesday said sentencing for Zacarias Moussaoui could go ahead but without critical aviation-related testimony and evidence.
http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=11531935&src=ActiveBuddy
The article didn't mention the fact that Moussaoui did plead guilty to having connections to al-Qaeda and was plotting to strike US with a plane but he denies that he had any knowledge of 9/11 so it only comes to a conclusion that he is an obvious patsy. In my gut feeling, pakistan's ISI probably set him up.
KevinTheOmnivore
Mar 28th, 2006, 02:00 PM
So Geggy, did the ISI force Moussaoui to confess to his role in 9/11, as well as implicating the shoe bomber....?
Frankly, I'm surprised we haven't linked all of this to Mossad yet. Jews. :rolleyes
ziggytrix
Mar 28th, 2006, 05:27 PM
does anyone else think mousey's confession seemed a little bit over the top?
i mean, that he and FAMOUS CELEBRITY shoebomber dude were supposed to have hijacked the 5th plane or whatever... doesn't this guy seem just a tad bit unbelievable?
if we told this guy someone tried to attack out President with a knife on suchandsuch date, and could he kindly state where he was that day, don't you suppose he would say something like "I WAS WITH YOUR DEVILDOG PRESIDENT ATTACKING HIM WITH A KNIFE! *foam*"
Mossad might have some great secret brainwashing program for all I know, but I refuse to believe they could get results like this piece of work. No, I think he's the real deal.
And by deal, I'm mean fruitcake.
Geggy
Mar 28th, 2006, 05:55 PM
I like to think this guy as oswald of 9/11. His stories is so full of contradictions it's hard to take this guy seriously.
It's worthy to mention that it has been recently revealed that the pakistan government bribed the 9/11 commission. Not sure if it's true. It's also widely known they had wired $100,000 to M. Atta, the supposedly prime suspect, prior to 9/11. Google it!
And Israel? They've been caught red handed performing false flag terrorism in the 50's and the whole government was brought down. False flag terrorism is something you should study on.
http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/5-1/text/beinin.html
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/lavon.html
Also google 'operation northwoods'. HW Bush was the director of the CIA during the time.
You know kevbo I could throw this stuff at your face all day and you'd still wouldn't keep it an open mind :lol
KevinTheOmnivore
Mar 28th, 2006, 06:14 PM
"And Israel? They've been caught red handed performing false flag terrorism in the 50's and the whole government was brought down."
Brought down, eh? Who caught them? how were they punished? What law did they violate?
More importantly, are you thus implying that because Israel supposedly performed "false flag terrorism", then they must have had a complicit role in 9/11?
Please say that.
Abcdxxxx
Mar 28th, 2006, 06:53 PM
http://futility.typepad.com/futility/images/lenny_squiggy_bw_med.jpg
Is Israel unique in demploying spies? That's not the reason the Lavon Affair is notable.
mburbank
Mar 29th, 2006, 10:04 AM
You defile the great Leny and Squiggy by posting them.
ItalianStereotype
Mar 29th, 2006, 04:42 PM
geggy, what you fail to realise is that there's a difference between keeping an open mind and being a lunatic.
Ant10708
Mar 29th, 2006, 04:54 PM
Italian do you like Blaze ya Dead Homie?
mburbank
Mar 30th, 2006, 10:12 AM
there is so no dfifference between those two things.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.