Log in

View Full Version : Casino Royal (without Woody Allen)


Comrade Rocket
Jun 7th, 2006, 01:40 AM
A new bond

This 007 film is suppost to be returning to the books roots that the lastest movies seem to have strayed away from.

I think it looks good.

http://a.videodetective.com/?PublishedID=592293

Fathom Zero
Jun 7th, 2006, 01:45 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Casino Royale the first James Bond film? My grandparents have the soundtrack somewhere on vinyl.

EDIT: Silly me, it wasn't. But it is certainly old.

http://imdb.com/title/tt0061452/

PETER SELLERS?

Comrade Rocket
Jun 7th, 2006, 01:47 AM
no the original casino royal was a comedy with woody allen. I saw it a looooong time ago and remember it being pretty funny.

http://imdb.com/title/tt0061452/

maybe a trip to suncoast is in order soon

Comrade Rocket
Jun 7th, 2006, 01:49 AM
Casino Royale was Ian Fleming's first James Bond novel. It was the only one not sold to Eon Productions. As a result, CBS TV first adapted it for an episode of "Climax!" (1954) in 1954, starring Barry Nelson as CIA agent Jimmy Bond. When plans began to adapt the novel as a motion picture, the original thought was to do a straight film of the novel. But with the success of Sean Connery's Bond, it was decided the only way a rival Bond film could survive would be as a parody. The Peter Sellers sequence is the only part of Ian Fleming's novel to make it into the film. The confrontation with Le Chiffre in the casino, the plan to discredit Le Chiffre with SMERSH and the villain's execution by enemy agents are all in the novel. So is the notion of Bond writing a book on baccarat, and the element of Vesper being an enemy spy. Reportedly, Eon Productions has been trying to buy back the rights to Casino Royale for years, in hopes of someday making a serious Bond film out of the novel. Despite being regarded as a "flop" financially in the press, the film actually did quite well in financial terms. Despite its very high production budget and additional costs in marketing and advertising, it still managed to make a net profit of well over $5 million for the studio. The film was generally reported as a failure financially in the press because it was outperformed at the box office by the official Bond film You Only Live Twice (1967), which was released in the same year, and because of the film's high costs. But in actuality the studio still made a large profit off the film and although it didn't match You Only Live Twice at the box office it still managed to do quite well. Casino Royale was the 3rd highest grossing film for the year behind only _Jungle Book, The (1967)_ and You Only Live Twice.

Fathom Zero
Jun 7th, 2006, 01:52 AM
You are very informed. And you have inspired me to buy the DVD.

Anywho, it had been the only James Bond film I hadn't heard of when I saw the soundtrack lying in a pile of my grand dad's ole vinyls.