The juttin Commie thread

[DuFresne]

Pfft...I'm seriously thinking communism is a better choice than George Bush's " Democracy". I wish it was 2008, already

All right, I know you were mostly just bushbashing when you wrote that, but I'm gonna give you this spiel anyway, assuming there's some commie in you that needs to be set free:

Complete and total economic control simply does not work. It has proven itself time and again to suck, and suck hard. When a government relies entirely on its alleged power to control the masses, corruption is the only thing down the path. But does that mean that the only other alternative is some hard-right republican form of anarchic liberty*? Of course not. Humans naturally tend to gravitate towards some kind of control whenever there is a lack of it, anyway. It's in our psyche. There is somewhere in the middle of the road that accomodates both our need for freedom and competition, and the need for control. Be a moderate, pansy.

*I know this not what Bush is for. I'ts just for the sake of argument.

[Juttin]

Look, I like Democracy. Although, they shouldn't let the, let's say, "ignorant masses" vote for any kind of serious leader.

Look at Bush. Who in their right mind would vote for this guy?

" BUT HOW CAN YOU FORGET THE 9/11?!"

Saddam Hussein had NOTHING to do with 9/11

I HATE over half of the people in this country, usually of the,
let's say, " Southern Variety "

[KevinTheOmnivore]

Who the hell are you people?

[Juttin]

You have to read general blabber to get the reference.

I think :/

[Sethomas]

IT'S EITHER DEMOCRACY WITH ITS UNRESTRICTED FREE ENTERPRISE OR TOTAL STALINISTIC COMMUNISM, THE ONLY KIND POSSIBLE, WHAT'S IT GONNA BE PUNK??

[DuFresne]

Oh, well when you put it that way... >:

[DuFresne]

Goddamn double post!!

[Fathom Zero]

You teased the retard, opened the can of worms, and opened Pandora's Box, my friend. You shouldn't take juttin seriously. He's... off.

[Juttin]

You teased the retard, opened the can of worms, and opened Pandora's Box, my friend. You shouldn't take juttin seriously. He's... off.


You know what?

FUCK YOU >:

[Fathom Zero]

I'd cut off my trade agreements with you if you hadn't already, you over-reactional bastard.

[Juttin]

I didn't even think you played that stupid game anymore

[Fathom Zero]

ON THE CONTRARY. I sent you a present.

[Archduke Tips]

I think the inherent flaw with government is that a few people always end up leading the masses.

The only logical solution is for a greater being to rule us all. I suggest either God or a really big computer that plays chess.

[Juttin]

Fine, I'll check to see what the " Present" is, then I'll declare peace.

Unless it's a cruise missle, in which case I'll continue causing your anarchy >:

[FartinMowler]

this thread officially sucks...I'm never going to be a moderator, but this smells like dog shit on a rotting prostitute :/

[Juttin]

Well, Chojin, or Kevin, can lock this whenever they want.

[Fathom Zero]

Well I'll be last if they do.

Or they could just move it to the Mock Wars, where it should be when you think about it.

[DuFresne]

Yeah, I was on the fence as to where to put it. I figured since it is a philosophical argument, and not a fag-fat-fag-fat argument, it should be here.

[KevinTheOmnivore]

Explain what the hell the topic is, and maybe we won't need to lock it up.

Are we discussing communism? Capitalism?

Here's a question on the theme presented earlier-- Why should citizens care? Why can't the masses be asses?

[kahljorn]

"Why should citizens care? Why can't the masses be asses?"

I don't know what this is directed at but I have two things to say:
Citizens should care and not be asses because they are citizens/participants of a socio-political structure that allows them to thrive in such large numbers, and was the foundation of such a population, and if they don't want a social structure they should live in the forest or on a farm :(

Which brings me to my second point, if you lived in the forest or on a farm a mass of asses would be very useful for maintaining a small communal functioning.

[DuFresne]

You can lock it you want. I just wanted to fuck with juttin for a while. :/ commie bastard.

[Courage the Cowardly Dog]

I hate the south too but you can't say Saddam didn't support terrorism just cause he didn't support ONE plot. How many other terrorist actions DID he support.

http://www.intelligence.org.il/eng/sib/5_05/img/saddam_36.jpg

What's this? It's $10,000 check to the family of a dead terrorist to thank them for their sacrifice in the holy war. He wrote a LOT of these.

If we didn't stop Saddam he'd support another attack and eventually one would be successful on american soil.

But americans arent the only lives that matter how about

http://www.pulseoftheworld.com/script/data/upimages/041013iraqgraves7.jpg

1,000,000 Iraqi corpses of people he had killed cause their race had a few people who didn't like his nazi ass policies.

Do you only give a flying shit if your next? Whata bout the people right next to him he had killed? Or the checks for people a few countries over? You know next he may wanted to go for white people, would you care then?

2,000+ deaths were to save countless thousand more. It amy be a rough war, it may be harsh and even futile (maybe) but if there is any chance of saving more lives how can we say no?

[Zhukov]

Christ.

[kahljorn]

I don't know terrorists have probably kind of proved themselves capable of commiting an extreme amount of damage with a small amount of expense.

MONEY TO FAMILIES isn't going to fund the terrorists. Want to know who it's TO: FAMILIES.

[Courage the Cowardly Dog]

I don't know terrorists have probably kind of proved themselves capable of commiting an extreme amount of damage with a small amount of expense.

MONEY TO FAMILIES isn't going to fund the terrorists. Want to know who it's TO: FAMILIES.
life insurance policy that covers suicide bombings and encourages the families to send more members to do it.

How the hell could this money be considered anything but encouraging it?

You don't think the survivors use the money on further terrorism?

It goes to TERRORIST FAMILIES, not "innocent people who had no idea the person would do this" but people who sent the person there to do it.

[kahljorn]

"You don't think the survivors use the money on further terrorism?"

No, certainly not all of them. I'm sure they already have plenty of money for terrorist

Families don't send terrorists somewhere, terrorists send terrorists places.

the rest is a kind of good point.

[Zhukov]

Are we talking the families ofterrorists, or entire families of terrorists?

[Juttin]

I could see that. They even have pets, like a fish, dog and cat, all with C4 strapped to them :)

[kahljorn]

I don't know, but I was wondering the same thing :(

We pay money to soldiers families if they die I think. Not too much of a difference.

[Grislygus]

I can't begin to describe how much I disagree with that...

[Chojin]

Thank god.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Look, I like Democracy. Although, they shouldn't let the, let's say, "ignorant masses" vote for any kind of serious leader.


Best contradictory statement EVAR.

Alexander Hamilton would have approved, though.

[Juttin]

I was saying...
" Democracy is good, if you don't let ignorant people vote"

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I was saying...
" Democracy is good, if you don't let ignorant people vote"

Ignorant being defined as "those who vote in ways you don't like"?

[Juttin]

Ignorant as in, " Don't understand what is going on in the political stance, but just re-vote for someone because they invaded an unrelated country to their precious 9/11 White-Trash Whiny Bullshit
Although, it doesn't matter, because they're all Towel-Head Terrorists, AMIRITE?"