PDA

View Full Version : ADMINISTRATION TO CYNICALLY EXPLOIT TRAGEDY


mburbank
Apr 23rd, 2003, 09:02 AM
By ADAM NAGOURNEY and RICHARD W. STEVENSON The New York Times

WASHINGTON, April 21 President Bush (news - web sites)'s advisers have drafted a re-election strategy built around staging the latest nominating convention in the party's history, allowing Mr. Bush to begin his formal campaign near the third anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks and to enhance his fund-raising advantage, Republicans close to the White House say.

In addition, Mr. Bush's advisers say they are prepared to spend as much as $200 million twice the amount of his first campaign to finance television advertising and other campaign expenses through the primary season that leads up to the Republican convention in September 2004. That would be a record amount by a presidential candidate, and would be especially notable because Mr. Bush faces no serious opposition for his party's nomination.

The president is planning a sprint of a campaign that would start, at least officially, with his acceptance speech at the Republican convention, a speech now set for Sept. 2.

The convention, to be held in New York City, will be the latest since the Republican Party was founded in 1856, and Mr. Bush's advisers said they chose the date so the event would flow into the commemorations of the third anniversary of the World Trade Center and Pentagon (news - web sites) attacks.

The back-to-back events would complete the framework for a general election campaign that is being built around national security and Mr. Bush's role in combatting terrorism, Republicans said. Not incidentally, they said they hoped it would deprive the Democratic nominee of critical news coverage during the opening weeks of the general electio campaign.

The strategy, described by Republicans close to the White House, is intended to highlight what Mr. Bush's advisers want to be the main issue of his campaign, national security, while intensifying his already formidable fund-raising advantage in the general election campaign.

By scheduling the start of the convention for Aug. 30, a month after Democrats choose their candidate, the White House has put off the imposition of spending ceilings that take effect when the parties officially nominate their candidates.

Under campaign spending laws, candidates who accept public financing will have about $75 million to spend between the nominating conventions and Election Day. Because the Democrats scheduled their convention for late July, the party's candidate will have to stretch out the same allocation over a longer period. The nominees of both parties are expected to accept public financing.

Even though Mr. Bush will not begin his formal campaign until after the convention, his political team is preparing to begin broadcasting television advertisements as early as next spring. By that point, the White House expects the Democratic candidate to be settled, but battered and sapped of money from the primaries, and thus unable to counter a Republican advertising assault.

The strategy of starting so late and building the campaign around the events in New York is not without risks. Mr. Bush's advisers said they were wary of being portrayed as exploiting the trauma of Sept. 11, a perception that might be particularly difficult to rebut as Mr. Bush shuttles between political events at Madison Square Garden and memorial services at ground zero.

AChimp
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:29 AM
$200 million for a campaign? What happened to the days when anybody could run for office? :/

mburbank
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:39 AM
Anybody can run, they just have no hope at all of being covered by the media unless they're willing to pony up a few hundred million.

glowbelly
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:44 AM
:(

it makes me sad that the general american population would fall for campaign tactics this obvious.

:(

mburbank
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:49 AM
"No one ever went broke underestimating the stupidity of the masses."
-P.T.Barnum ( I think. It might have been Twain. Or maybe Carrot Top.)

VinceZeb
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:52 AM
Democrats do it to. Hell, anyone with money and power can exploit for their own gain. No big whup that the president is doing it.

mburbank
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:54 AM
So you don't find it cynical or exploitative?

glowbelly
Apr 23rd, 2003, 11:56 AM
sounds like mencken to me. maybe. who knows?

mburbank
Apr 23rd, 2003, 12:03 PM
I don't know about Vinces new style of dropping in for a second here and there, just long enough to type

"Blah. So what. Big Whup. Who cares."

It's almost like he's scared to say anything of substance.

kellychaos
Apr 23rd, 2003, 12:38 PM
It's almost like he's scared to say anything of substance.

Whoah there pardner! That would imply "ability", n'est-ce pas? :)

mburbank
Apr 23rd, 2003, 12:41 PM
I'm sorry. Replace 'substance' with 'significant word count'.

AChimp
Apr 23rd, 2003, 12:48 PM
http://members.shaw.ca/achimp/stan.gif

Vince: Democrats do it to. Hell, anyone with money and power can exploit for their own gain. No big whup that the president is doing it.

Protoclown
Apr 23rd, 2003, 12:55 PM
Democrats do it to. Hell, anyone with money and power can exploit for their own gain. No big whup that the president is doing it.

Vince, I just thought I would point out that YOU were the first one in this thread to bring up political parties. The article mentions the Republican party insomuch as Bush is a member of the party, but I feel that the focus of the article is on the BUSH ADMINISTRATION (NOT Republicans as a whole) and its digusting tactics.

This is about Bush. Not about Republicans or Democrats.

You short-sighted boob.