PDA

View Full Version : Bush and his chums fucked up? YA DON'T SAY!


Mockery
Jul 8th, 2003, 12:46 PM
http://www.msnbc.com/news/935946.asp?0cv=CA01

:dumbass

Protoclown
Jul 8th, 2003, 12:53 PM
Too bad the electoral college fucked up :(

Carnivore
Jul 8th, 2003, 01:09 PM
Hundreds and thousands of posts could go under the same heading.

Zero Signal
Jul 8th, 2003, 01:46 PM
I wonder how many other claims that Bush has made have been lies, too. :blah

Zosimus
Jul 8th, 2003, 05:56 PM
Zero: just count the amount of times he has opened his mouth and times it by infinity...that is just a rough estimate though

kahljorn
Jul 8th, 2003, 08:05 PM
I just realized how much bush looks like one of those little troll dolls.

The One and Only...
Jul 8th, 2003, 08:11 PM
Ya know, I'm even more scared to think how many times Al Gore would have fucked up.

kahljorn
Jul 8th, 2003, 08:16 PM
They should just put Doogy Houser into office. That would fix em.

VinceZeb
Jul 8th, 2003, 09:16 PM
What is worse is that THEY ADMITTED THEIR MISTAKES!

Oh man, they came out and admitted they were wrong.... honesty... now that is scary!

:stupidthreadforinternetgeeks

Sethomas
Jul 8th, 2003, 09:25 PM
I hope this honesty means that those thousands of civilians can have their lives back.

AChimp
Jul 8th, 2003, 10:28 PM
What is worse is that THEY ADMITTED THEIR MISTAKES!

Oh man, they came out and admitted they were wrong.... honesty... now that is scary!
Uh huh... so why is it the underling of an underling of an underling that's making the announcement rather than Bush himself? :blah

If they were wrong about the uranium, then there's a good possibility that they were wrong about a lot of other things, too.

ranxer
Jul 8th, 2003, 11:04 PM
this is just a quota fulfillment for them to admit to one lie a year..
oops, they didnt admit they lied!
they only admitted they were wrong.. to bad the fact that they knew it was a lie when they told it won't be admitted >:

Jeanette X
Jul 8th, 2003, 11:42 PM
What is worse is that THEY ADMITTED THEIR MISTAKES!

Oh man, they came out and admitted they were wrong.... honesty... now that is scary!

Yes Vince, especially since you have never done that yourself.

Carnivore
Jul 9th, 2003, 01:50 AM
Ya know, I'm even more scared to think how many times Al Gore would have fucked up.

That is so retarded a statement. So many people assume Gore would have sucked ass dealing with 9/11 but upon what is that assumption based? He's infinitely more intelligent that Bush. People don't give him nearly enough credit.

kahljorn
Jul 9th, 2003, 02:11 AM
I don't think you could say how he handled it either way, because he's not the president. Kind of like wondering how nader would've done if he were in office.

VinceZeb
Jul 9th, 2003, 07:58 AM
I believe Gore was the vice president for 8 years. But I guess that doesn't qualify us to make informed decisions on what he would do as president, does it?

Jesus Christ, can you all be any more biased/ignorant?

Dole
Jul 9th, 2003, 08:13 AM
Calm down lad. The only person who said anything even vaguely positive about gore was Carnivore.

He is less evil and more intelligent than Bu$h but thats hardly achievement of the year, is it?

Mockery
Jul 9th, 2003, 08:21 AM
More on the uranium story...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3056626.stm

VinceZeb
Jul 9th, 2003, 08:29 AM
Wow, the BBC has something about it... what a shock. They would report that Bush is a sexual deviant if they could find a cousin's brother's uncle's nephew's cousin that would say he is.

Mockery
Jul 9th, 2003, 09:13 AM
Wow, the BBC has something about it... what a shock. They would report that Bush is a sexual deviant if they could find a cousin's brother's uncle's nephew's cousin that would say he is.

Coming from a guy who's still talking about Bill Clinton's past sexual endeavors, that argument hardly holds any water.

VinceZeb
Jul 9th, 2003, 09:20 AM
It's important becuase it proved our former president is a two-faced liar.

Zero Signal
Jul 9th, 2003, 12:13 PM
I see some of you still naively believe that who is President actually matters. The agendas will roll on, no matter who is in office. An inexorable march towards destiny.

The One and Only...
Jul 9th, 2003, 03:47 PM
Ya know, I'm even more scared to think how many times Al Gore would have fucked up.

That is so retarded a statement. So many people assume Gore would have sucked ass dealing with 9/11 but upon what is that assumption based? He's infinitely more intelligent that Bush. People don't give him nearly enough credit.

He was a senator(?) and a vice president, being horrible at both. He also lied and said he invented the internet. I think that's enough to say he would have been a horrible president.

Jeanette X
Jul 9th, 2003, 03:56 PM
He also lied and said he invented the internet.
No, he didn't say that. He claimed that he had helped to pass legislation that was key in making the internet what it is.

Anti-Xocial
Jul 9th, 2003, 07:21 PM
It's important becuase it proved our former president is a two-faced liar.

Indeed...so unlike our current president, who is so straight-up and honest :rolleyes In (hopefully) a year, when gwb is gone, they will have revealed all the crap georgie-boy has swept under the carpet during all these years of his term. I think you little boy will see how gulliable you have been!

I see some of you still naively believe that who is President actually matters. The agendas will roll on, no matter who is in office. An inexorable march towards destiny.

Read vincezeb! Read, learn and grow-up......

FS
Jul 10th, 2003, 06:55 AM
But, don't you see? A president lying about getting head is A THOUSAND TIMES worse than a president lying about the threat of another nation in order to start a war that kills 3000+ people.

VinceZeb
Jul 10th, 2003, 07:58 AM
Did George Bush get impeached? Is George Bush a PROVEN liar?


Did Bill Clinton get impeached? Is Bill Clinton a PROVEN liar?

Bennett
Jul 10th, 2003, 10:59 AM
Is your retort relevant? Are you a proven moron?

VinceZeb
Jul 10th, 2003, 11:01 AM
Your response proves the intelligent of this message board.

Just admit that all the liberals are trying to find a rope they can tie around Bush's neck, and you might actually have something now.

What about Clinton with the bombing of the asprin factory? Amazingly enough, that hasn't been brought up yet. But then again, I am asking for constinency from liberals, which means the only thing that can be expected from you is to be ignorant of the situation time and time and TIME again.

Drew Katsikas
Jul 10th, 2003, 11:08 AM
Your response proves the intelligent of this message board.

Wow. Your stupidity is uncanny.


Bill Clinton's long gone buddy! He got his dick sucked, and lied about it. Already been dealt with a couple years ago. Your completley irrelevant comeback is, well, completley irrelevant. We're saying that Bush made a statement which he claimed was fact, which has been recently disproven. He really fucked up, because this is a war, not oral sex. We're not bashing Republicans, or trying to say "ooh look, now Bush's a liar and so Clinton isn't so bad." That's not the argument at hand here, Vinth, I thought even you could realize something so simple.

Bennett
Jul 10th, 2003, 11:12 AM
Vince, you ignorant slut.

I have seen more than one person on this board cite their disagreements with Clintons military actions. Burbank and Helm to name two, since you don't remember. At the time I was very vocal about the issue, as well, not only about the morality of the actions, but at the lack of media coverage of our international bombing, and the general apathy of the American public.

This is consistency, when you disagree with military actions and the deaths of innocents no matter the political party involved.

As far as looking for a rope to tie around someone's neck, why are you still talking about Clinton getting a b.j.? As a Libertarian, I would think you would understand that this is a part of the man's private life, and drop the Ken Starr witch-hunt already.

And as usual, you've avoided the initial comment made by FS, that on one hand you have a person who lied about getting head, and you have another who lied in order to start a war, which in turn killed thousands of people. Which is worse, Vinth?

Protoclown
Jul 10th, 2003, 01:03 PM
The Democrat. DUH! :rolleyes

FS
Jul 10th, 2003, 01:27 PM
What is so funny is that Vince is contesting the definition of the word "lie" in the exact same manner that Clinton contested the definition of "sexual relations".

Vince, what exactly are you trying to prove? That Bush is no less a dickhead than Clinton? Bush gave the world certainties and confirmations that he knew were at best shady and at worst picked out of a hat. Now you can balk all you want about how this does not constitue as a lie, but tell me this: was Bush HONEST to the American public when he told them he was certain of the threat of Iraq?

Zebra 3
Jul 10th, 2003, 02:13 PM
:/ - The only new thing here is that there's now another overpaid White House mouth piece that's admitting the Nigerian documents were a crude forgery. The CIA conluded all this and was on TV and in all the newspapers before the Iraqi invasion. Its worth noting, Colin Powell submitted this forged document at an U.N. meeting as proof that Iraq was building WMDs.

VinceZeb
Jul 10th, 2003, 07:59 PM
I'm saying this:

Bush has not under any burden of proof lied.

Clinton was convicted of perjury that has nothing to do with Monica.

You all think Clinton's little ordeal was nothing important but will say the president lied without any proof whatsoever.

Drew Katsikas
Jul 10th, 2003, 09:32 PM
CLINTON HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS!! We aren't comparing presidents, Vinth!
Although I may agree that Bush lied, the argument is that he fucked up. Maybe you would be able to make a slightly reasonable comeback if you read the title of the post correctly! Wait, who am I kidding, even with full information you would still spit out some brainless incoherent reply.

Zebra 3
Jul 10th, 2003, 09:59 PM
You all think Clinton's little ordeal was nothing important but will say the president lied without any proof whatsoever.
>: - Ken Starr spent over $60M of taxpayers money on that whole fuckin' cigargate investigation - that money would of been plenty to build 'the Bridge to the 21st century'.

mburbank
Jul 11th, 2003, 11:19 AM
"Now liberals all you want to have done is to be at the discreditting of bush when who was the perjury during his Presidention and got the impeachment over it? Clinton. Now how come I don't not have the hearing about that from you now? I'll say this about myself and remember it's me saying on myself the things, if you are so stupid you can't see that in terms of presidentng you can't know a proven thing about bush without which the first having compared to which Clinto also having done things then what can you say? Oh, I forgot, nothing. But now you liberals would believe that a bad thing by Bush was been done by him even if the source was anyhthing at all if it said a bad thing about Bush by him which is what liberals do. Dumbass. Uhm... also your mothers all is sucking on my cock."
-Vinth McCraniallethions

The One and Only...
Jul 11th, 2003, 02:21 PM
I think mburbank has ego issues, because he apparently feels necessary to quote everything Vince says.

Just like to point that out.

mburbank
Jul 11th, 2003, 03:07 PM
laughing emoticon.

mburbank
Jul 14th, 2003, 03:13 PM
(AP) - President Bush defended the quality of intelligence he receives as "darn good" despite an uproar over disputed reports that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Africa for nuclear weapons.




Tee hee. Is 'Darn Good' as good as 'Damn Good.'?



I love the latest spin.

The gist is, see, the claim that Saddam was trying to purchase Uranium from Nigeria is true, see, it's just the evidence of it we had that was false. The British have real true evidence, but they won't let us see it.

And the question of who forged the evidence and why? That there's one of them revigionsit questions.

Zero Signal
Jul 14th, 2003, 03:21 PM
Bush also called Africa a nation. :rolleyes