PDA

View Full Version : STUPID AMERICANS


VinceZeb
Sep 25th, 2003, 08:26 AM
STUPID AMERICANS

Hey ... sorry to begin this rant with those words, but if they work, if they apply, why not use them?

This morning we learn from an NBC - Wall Street Journal poll that Bush's approval numbers are now down below 50%. This can be blamed on three reasons:

That America is still in the middle of World War IV, the war against terrorism, and that war has by no means been won. There are still thousands of Islamic Terrorist out there who want to make their mark by killing as many Americans as they can, and that there are still terrorist/rogue regimes who are hell-bent on developing the weapons necessary to bring America to its knees. For instance, can some of you rocket scientists out there tell me why the country with the second-largest oil reserves in the world (Iran) needs nuclear reactors?
Americans have bought into the Democratic Party onslaught against Bush ... believing the lies that he lied, and conveniently forgetting the fact that Bush said the same things that Clinton and various hot-shot Democrats had been saying long before he moved to the White House.
Americans have forgotten that (a) the economic recession began in March of 2001, under Bill Clinton, and (b) that the economy is now growing strongly with an expected third quarter rate of over four percent, and (b) job are always the last thing to come around when recovering from a recession.
Go ahead ... tell me that you want the Democrats to be in charge of fighting the war on terrorism. Don't you remember what happened the last time the Demcorats were in control of American foreign policy? We had the decade of appeasement. Islamic terrorists attack the World Trade Center in 1993. Clinton spits in their general direction, and nothing more. Hell, Clinton never even visits the site of the attack! A tornado roars through Osceola County Florida and Clinton is there ... touring a trailer park. Islamic terrorists attack New York City and Clinton is nowhere to be found. The difference? Clinton knows he could count of the votes of New York, so no need to go there to pander. Florida? A different story ... better get down there and do some grippin' and grinnin' with the tornado victimes.

Then Osama attacks the Khobar Towers. American servicemen die. Clinton spits. Then it's the USS Cole. American servicemen die. Clinton spits. We even have that pathetic situation where American warplanes were on the tarmac, armed and fueled, and ready to carry out an attack on one of Osama's training camps. They have to shut down and head back to their hangars because Clinton is too busy at some golf tournament to take a moment to give his military commanders the "go" order. Now that's some attention to detail, isn't it?

Oh ... and then there was the time that Sudan wanted to simply hand Osama over to the United States. Clinton said no, you folks just keep him." Three thousand American lives lost that very minute. Yeah ... these Democrats are the ones you want in charge of our national security, right?

Oh ... but you're worried about our economy. That's why you are not satisfied with Bush. Do you want to see our economy take a real hit? Let those Islamic terrorists bring down just one commercial airliner with a ground-to-air missile. Watch the airline industry literally shut down ... then you'll get an economic show you won't soon forget. Or, much worse, let those Islamic terrorists get some of their chemical or biological weapons into a water supply or subway system. Now that would generate quite an economic spectacle for you to wring your hands over. Then, of course, we have the possibility of a nuclear event in New York, Chicago or Los Angeles. Yeah, your job would be real safe then, wouldn't it.

You've heard of Job No. One, haven't you? Well, right now America's Job Number One is to fight Islamic Terrorism. The Islamic radicals have declared war on every man, woman and child in the United States. They want to kill you. We can either appease them, and then live in fear of a change of heart, or we can destroy them. You know damn well which party is the party of appeasement, and which is the party dedicated to destroying the terrorist enemy and protecting American lives an property. You have a choice to make, and it's not made on who "cares" more, it needs to be based on who will DO more.

-------

*sprays a liberal coat of the "Vinth-Boorthz" musk around the post*

*waits for Max to show up*

Zhukov
Sep 25th, 2003, 08:40 AM
Wait a second, are you saying that Bill Clinton wasn't so good after all?


What have I been doing with my life?


For instance, can some of you rocket scientists out there tell me why the country with the second-largest oil reserves in the world (Iran) needs nuclear reactors?

a)I'm no rocket scientist, but I always thought that petrol was never a good source of electricity. a) Heck, why should the US have nuclear power plants? a) It imports the most oil in the whole world.

And a) Just wait till those Democrats put their weapons of mass biological weapons in your water supply, then we'll see who you'll vote for come 2004.

ranxer
Sep 25th, 2003, 09:31 AM
why did the cia interview bin laden in a U.S. hospital in dubai in Oct 2001 and not arrest him? the bush administration as most administrations pick and choose thier enemies when and where they want.. seems to me bin laden had a job to do before he was allegedly on a hunted list.

comparing bush to slick willy is a waste of time, they are both corporate stooges.. just a slightly different stripe.

we need viable third parties!

the war on terror will never be won(and will never get passed being a farce) as long as we don't go after the real source of terror - corporations involved with our foriegn policy. THAT is the source of the blowback that is the 9/11 attacks.

mburbank
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:00 AM
Sorry to have kept you waiting this long, Veronica.

Well, I guess my beating Vinth to the cut n' paste yesterday got him up pretty early this morning, which is nice for him.

If you hadn't guessed by the complete sentences, the post is just a Boortz cut n' paste, and as Vinth indicates in one of the three sentences he forced his chubby fingers to slap ontyo the keys, it's the equivalent of pissing like a dog on a telephone pole.

He must have been in quite a hurry to, since it's the very first piece on Boortz's web site and their was no command to post.

Zhukov
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:09 AM
I wouldn't have believed it wasn't Vince until somebody told me.


edit: Which ones are the Vince 'sentences'? The two last ones and...

VinceZeb
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:12 AM
why did the cia interview bin laden in a U.S. hospital in dubai in Oct 2001 and not arrest him?

Any proof or is this just more of your insane, illogical rantings?

Zhukov
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:16 AM
Why didn't Colin Powell arrest Saddam when they shook hands in the 80's?

mburbank
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:19 AM
Why didn't Donald Rumsfeld arrest Sadaam when they met instread of presenting him with an expensive gift, ie. gold spurs?

VinceZeb
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:25 AM
When did these meetings take place?

If they took place before the gassing of the Kurds, then because Saddam was our "ally" in the Middle East conflict.

mburbank
Sep 25th, 2003, 10:30 AM
I'll look it up for you later. I know you have a very hard time with the internet and it's search functions.

In the meantime, just so you know, the gassing of the Kurds took place after Gulf War I, which was quite some time after our relationship with Sadaam soured.

Are you suggesting we didn't know that Sadaam in particular and the Baath party in general were the people they were? That we didn't know they routinely tortured and murdered their citizens? That is was a good idea to ally ourselves with them and give them large sums of taxpayer money? Did you think La Rummy bought those golden spurs himself?

ranxer
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:04 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html

all sources i can find point to the French daily Le Figaro. and..
reports come "from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere."

look up bin laden and the cia sometime.. lots of print on that.

and don't bother with those french blabla.. i know what you and Limbastard along with the rabid right have to say about them frenchies.

ill admit the meeting is 'alleged' and that washington denies it.

VinceZeb
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:13 AM
The source you give me was from the Guardian?

Wow.

Zhukov
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:20 AM
Gave.


And, Ranx, was that meeting before or after Osama was our ally?

Dole
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:29 AM
"The source you give me was from the Guardian? "

-its a far more credible source than the right wing hate tracts you cutnpaste from.

mburbank
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:34 AM
How can you compare the Guardian to unsourced Boortz material tht Boortz himself doesn't source?

VinceZeb
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:40 AM
It isn't Boortz' job to source his material. He tells everyone to look for themselves. I post it here to make you all frothe at the mouth. It works.

Dole, the Guardian has had to retract stories time and time again because they were proven to be bullshit. They are about as reliable as rantings from the Unibomber.

kellychaos
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:43 AM
I don't know if I like the old ranting, grammatically challenged Vinth or the the new, improved cut-n-paste Vinth better. :/

Zhukov
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:45 AM
Osama and Bush are allies! I have an article! Find it yourself!

mburbank
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:49 AM
They're both better than a colonoscopy, but only a little.

Vinth, I'm 'frothe'-ing. Hows the remedial English class going?

How do you know the Guardian had to retract articles? because Boortz told you? Wht rticles? Did he source it? Did you look for yourself? Or did you just slurp it down whole like a hering and then beep the horns for him?

And if you quit your site while you were depressed, you should re-evaluate now tht your meds have been stabalized.

punkgrrrlie10
Sep 25th, 2003, 11:56 AM
Jeremiah was a bull frog, he was a good friend of mine...

Never understood a single word he said, but I helped him drink his wine.

Zhukov
Sep 25th, 2003, 12:18 PM
My statements I make have sources. That is credibility.

Zosimus
Sep 25th, 2003, 05:14 PM
STUPID AMERICANS

That America is still in the middle of World War IV, the war against terrorism, and that war has by no means been won.

This time, you lost me at the very beginning of your first sentence vince! Pardon me for being so critical here, but when exactly did the Third World War" start/end since, you just pounced straight out and started talking about the fourth one?!

Must have happened while I was sleeping? Shit! :eek

ranxer
Sep 25th, 2003, 05:30 PM
"Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital"

pappy bush often stayed at the bin laden family palaces.. many a deal were crafted between and hosted by Bin laden family members and texas oil contacts.. little bushy probly played cops and robbers with osama around the palace..heeh.
i thought pappy bush was the point man to a lot of mid east oil deals.. big money works with big money.. then again cia connections might help some.

FS
Sep 26th, 2003, 06:37 AM
Zosimus, the third and fourth World Wars are something people like Boortz made up for the purpose of their spittle rants sounding more dramatic and so mental copraphagi like Vince can achieve a greater erection while listening to him, because they glorify war and it makes them feel like they're aware of something the rest of the world missed out on.

punkgrrrlie10
Sep 26th, 2003, 12:44 PM
Joyyyy to the world.

All the boys and girls.

Immortal Goat
Sep 26th, 2003, 01:40 PM
WWIII never took place. If it did, then it would be referred to as WWIII in history books. I know what Vince and Boortz are referring to when they are talking about World War III & IV, but they were NOT World Wars.

The war we are fighting now is not involving armies from almost every country fighting for world-wide betterment, it is armies from a select few countries that are pissed because of a "he-said she-said" situation and they want the oil for themselves. That, and, as an added bonus, we took out a powerfully evil overlord, but that was just some very convenient collateral damage.

Anonymous
Sep 26th, 2003, 03:04 PM
Let me make sure this is the idea I am of the getting here. Wars are only world when they make the betterment of society? Hmmmm, perhaps this so-called collateral damage is the focus all along? Couldn't be, Bush is uncapable of running the country, being only THE PRESIDENT.

End of story.

Immortal Goat
Sep 26th, 2003, 05:48 PM
Bush is not a real president. He is an ex-president's son who got in the office by a Floridian Fuck-Up.

Helm
Sep 26th, 2003, 06:01 PM
Geez, thanks Suffocation :(

Anonymous
Sep 26th, 2003, 08:45 PM
Comedy shows must be awfully confusing for you, Goat.

Immortal Goat
Sep 26th, 2003, 11:20 PM
Nope, I'm not confused by comedy shows. Bush's main goal was NOT to free the Iraqi people, although that is what he made it out to be. His main goal was to secure votes from the war-happy citizens of this country. He couldn't get Bin Ladin, so he went for "Public Enemy Number Two".


End of story.

VinceZeb
Sep 27th, 2003, 02:00 PM
Goat, you are a complete liberal robot. If you still whine about the recount, then that just proves you don't have the brains to compete in intelligent political discourse.

The records don't lie: No matter how you slice it, Bush still would have won Florida. Accept that.

mburbank
Sep 29th, 2003, 10:46 AM
So you're saying that you would know intelligent politcial discourse if you saw it? Or are you merely trying to pulmb new deoths of irony, no longer satisfied with telling people they need remedial English?

You're saying you're capable of engaging in intelligent political discourse? Becuase I haven't seen any indication of that here, on your own abandoned site, or at newsfilter. Are you perhaps engaging in intelligent polictical discourse from an undisclosed location?

You are by no stretch of the imagination intelligent, your politics rarely if ever rises above the level of sports team loyalty, and far as discourse goes, that means a verbal interchange of ideas, not merely a string of disconnected, one sided harangues and diatribes.

Immortal Goat
Sep 29th, 2003, 04:15 PM
Goat, you are a complete liberal robot.

Fuck no. I can't believe that YOU of ALL PEOPLE are accusing someone of blindly following anything that is fucking shoved down someone's throat! You are a fucking hypocrite. You with your "all liberals are fucking idiots that God gives cancer to" and "you only go to heaven if you believe what I do" horse shit. You are programmed more efficiently than a CIA computer system.

Vinth, you are a complete conservative robot, a fucking moron, and, while I'm at it, the complete embodiment of all the reasons some people do NOT believe in Christianity.

Anonymous
Sep 30th, 2003, 03:59 AM
Goat, take a moment to think that two posts back of mine, I might have been not 100% serious. Maybe kidding. Maybe even imitating someone.

Immortal Goat
Sep 30th, 2003, 03:28 PM
Sorry, Chojin, I missed the sarcasm there. I was tired and wanted to go to bed. It won't happen again.

AlexZello
Feb 7th, 2008, 11:38 PM
What do you think of Obadiah Shoher's views on the Middle East conflict? One can argue, of course, that Shoher is ultra-right, but his followers are far from being a marginal group. Also, he rejects Jewish moralistic reasoning - that's alone is highly unusual for the Israeli right. And he is very influential here in Israel. So what do you think? uh, here's the site in question: Middle East conflict (http://samsonblinded.org/blog)

Emu
Feb 7th, 2008, 11:42 PM
Dude.

This thread was started four and a half years ago.

What the fuck.

Dr. Boogie
Feb 8th, 2008, 12:09 PM
Man, to look back through this thread and realize that only one of the original posters still frequents the boards...

Fat_Hippo
Feb 8th, 2008, 06:12 PM
Man, to look back through this thread and realize that only one of the original posters still frequents the boards...

Well, it has been a pretty damn long time...don't threads ever get sent to an archive or something in this forum?

Dr. Boogie
Feb 8th, 2008, 06:48 PM
Yeah, if they're really remarkable. We're not in a habit of locking up every single old thread to keep newbie morons from trying to resurrect them.

ElPila666
Feb 13th, 2008, 01:30 AM
SAVE THE WORLD!!!!

Miss Modular
Feb 13th, 2008, 07:45 PM
http://www.depauldodgeball.com/profile/soda.jpg

STUPID AMERICANS!!!

ranxer
Feb 20th, 2008, 10:45 AM
what's this thread got to do with Obadiah Shoher's views on the Middle East?
stupid americans?
i had a ringing in my ear and had to find out what the talk was about.
i'm not too familiar with internal israeli politics except the ones that are here in America like the pressure behind senate bill S. 1959.. yikes
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=5058
or things like AIPAC(with friend pelosi) getting thrown out of Kucinich offices
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/02/371899.shtml

mburbank
Feb 21st, 2008, 10:11 AM
I miss Vinth. He must be out there somewhere in some new internet incarnation. Can any of you techno whizzes find him?

Emu
Feb 21st, 2008, 01:20 PM
He's ElPila :eek

El Blanco
Feb 21st, 2008, 05:33 PM
ranx, good to see you. Glad you decided not to add to the conversation except for some pointless conspiracy theories.

Geggy
Feb 22nd, 2008, 01:53 PM
I want to apologize for El Blanco. He spends most of his days listening to nazi marching songs from long playing records in his collection alone at home and frequently click his heels and pretending to be an SS officer.

El Blanco
Feb 22nd, 2008, 03:37 PM
Thanks, Geggy, but I'm more than capable of expressing my own thoughts and ideas. I don't even even need to cut and paste from an article that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

Even if I were deficient in that respect, I'd certainly prefer help from someone with comprehension skills greater than a watermelon.

And being called a Nazi by you is like being called creepy by Tom Cruise. Need we go call up some of your anti-semitic rants?

MacLeon
Mar 1st, 2008, 07:38 PM
STUPID AMERICANS

Hey ... sorry to begin this rant with those words, but if they work, if they apply, why not use them?

This morning we learn from an NBC - Wall Street Journal poll that Bush's approval numbers are now down below 50%. This can be blamed on three reasons:

That America is still in the middle of World War IV, the war against terrorism, and that war has by no means been won. There are still thousands of Islamic Terrorist out there who want to make their mark by killing as many Americans as they can, and that there are still terrorist/rogue regimes who are hell-bent on developing the weapons necessary to bring America to its knees. For instance, can some of you rocket scientists out there tell me why the country with the second-largest oil reserves in the world (Iran) needs nuclear reactors?
Americans have bought into the Democratic Party onslaught against Bush ... believing the lies that he lied, and conveniently forgetting the fact that Bush said the same things that Clinton and various hot-shot Democrats had been saying long before he moved to the White House.
Americans have forgotten that (a) the economic recession began in March of 2001, under Bill Clinton, and (b) that the economy is now growing strongly with an expected third quarter rate of over four percent, and (b) job are always the last thing to come around when recovering from a recession.
Go ahead ... tell me that you want the Democrats to be in charge of fighting the war on terrorism. Don't you remember what happened the last time the Demcorats were in control of American foreign policy? We had the decade of appeasement. Islamic terrorists attack the World Trade Center in 1993. Clinton spits in their general direction, and nothing more. Hell, Clinton never even visits the site of the attack! A tornado roars through Osceola County Florida and Clinton is there ... touring a trailer park. Islamic terrorists attack New York City and Clinton is nowhere to be found. The difference? Clinton knows he could count of the votes of New York, so no need to go there to pander. Florida? A different story ... better get down there and do some grippin' and grinnin' with the tornado victimes.

Then Osama attacks the Khobar Towers. American servicemen die. Clinton spits. Then it's the USS Cole. American servicemen die. Clinton spits. We even have that pathetic situation where American warplanes were on the tarmac, armed and fueled, and ready to carry out an attack on one of Osama's training camps. They have to shut down and head back to their hangars because Clinton is too busy at some golf tournament to take a moment to give his military commanders the "go" order. Now that's some attention to detail, isn't it?

Oh ... and then there was the time that Sudan wanted to simply hand Osama over to the United States. Clinton said no, you folks just keep him." Three thousand American lives lost that very minute. Yeah ... these Democrats are the ones you want in charge of our national security, right?

Oh ... but you're worried about our economy. That's why you are not satisfied with Bush. Do you want to see our economy take a real hit? Let those Islamic terrorists bring down just one commercial airliner with a ground-to-air missile. Watch the airline industry literally shut down ... then you'll get an economic show you won't soon forget. Or, much worse, let those Islamic terrorists get some of their chemical or biological weapons into a water supply or subway system. Now that would generate quite an economic spectacle for you to wring your hands over. Then, of course, we have the possibility of a nuclear event in New York, Chicago or Los Angeles. Yeah, your job would be real safe then, wouldn't it.

You've heard of Job No. One, haven't you? Well, right now America's Job Number One is to fight Islamic Terrorism. The Islamic radicals have declared war on every man, woman and child in the United States. They want to kill you. We can either appease them, and then live in fear of a change of heart, or we can destroy them. You know damn well which party is the party of appeasement, and which is the party dedicated to destroying the terrorist enemy and protecting American lives an property. You have a choice to make, and it's not made on who "cares" more, it needs to be based on who will DO more.

-------

*sprays a liberal coat of the "Vinth-Boorthz" musk around the post*

*waits for Max to show up* World War IV? We never even passed three.

executioneer
Mar 1st, 2008, 07:41 PM
yeah dark purple's much better than dark red

MacLeon
Mar 1st, 2008, 07:55 PM
yeah dark purple's much better than dark red
Is this a sarcasm, or genuine? Hell, I suppose in either case the question is irrelevant.

executioneer
Mar 1st, 2008, 08:02 PM
yeah it was sarcasm. use regular colored text, idiot, everyone who reads your shit has to squint and it automatically makes them hate you

MacLeon
Mar 1st, 2008, 08:12 PM
yeah it was sarcasm. use regular colored text, idiot, everyone who reads your shit has to squint and it automatically makes them hate youYou see, the fact that the administrator allowed for different color texts on this site, means it's my prerogative to use it. Change your shitty avatar, and maybe I will consider changing my text color.

executioneer
Mar 1st, 2008, 08:16 PM
you know what else the administrators allowed on this site?

an ignoooore feeeatuuuuure

executioneer
Mar 1st, 2008, 08:18 PM
so i'd get used to people not responding to your posts anymore if i were you

Fat_Hippo
Mar 2nd, 2008, 08:20 AM
Okay, Macleon, it's very simple. You post here, so I assume you want people to read what you write. But at the moment, I actually have to highlight everything you write to be able to read it, and very soon, I'm not gonna bother with that anymore, and I doubt other people will either, making your posts completely superflous. We told you nicely, but you didn't listen, and within a few days of posting, you've made yourself unanimously scorned by pretty much everyone here.
The way I see it, there are only 2 reasons to join a forum: To make friends and discuss with others, or because that person has a masochistic bent and enjoys verbal abuse. So far your reason seems to be the latter. Either stop being a jackass, and some people here might actually give you another chance, or fuck off, okay? Because if you don't do one, you WILL do the other, either voluntarily or forced. Let's see if you can get that through your thick, font-formatted skull.

Tadao
Mar 2nd, 2008, 02:09 PM
If he changes his font color now, then he's a pussy.

Girl Drink Drunk
Mar 2nd, 2008, 02:22 PM
Macleon kinda reminds me of this poster called Legion, from a few years back http://www.i-mockery.com/forum/showthread.php?p=301089&highlight=pretentious+asshole#post301089

Helm, where are you? :(

Fat_Hippo
Mar 2nd, 2008, 02:57 PM
Wow, Legion was an even bigger douchebag than this punk here. Well, at least he used colors you could still clearly read on a dark background. Oh well, he's sure to get bored eventually anyway. Little bitches like these usually do.

Tadao
Mar 2nd, 2008, 03:50 PM
Yeah, I see it. It's not just the use of colors and fonts for no apparent reason, it's also the abuse of the dictionary to cover up the fact that he is void of thought. Let me just add that Legion pussed out and used the normal font and color and then never backed himself up against Helm.

I know McMurphy will do the same. And changeing onto another character is pussing out you pussy puss McPuss.



Puss

executioneer
Mar 2nd, 2008, 08:35 PM
legion was an alt of mad max, btw

Cosmo Electrolux
Mar 5th, 2008, 09:50 AM
only complete faggots use purple as a font color....might as well post a pic of him getting railed in the ass in a truck stop bathroom.

kahljorn
Mar 5th, 2008, 10:26 PM
Fags... or royalty, you disrespectful asshole.

Chojin
Mar 6th, 2008, 12:32 AM
Also - Read the rules, idjit.

http://i-mockery.com/forum/faq.php?faq=rules_guidelines#faq_rules_guide

mburbank
Mar 6th, 2008, 11:37 AM
Macleon, I don't know if anyone has told you this yet, but I can't read a word of what you've written because of the font color. It just doesn't read against black, so whatever stylistic reason you chose it for, since a message board is primarily a form of written communication, it just isn't worth it. It's as if we were having a conversation, and you were so quiet I couldn't hear anything you said.

Hope this helps, and good luck,

-Max

Cosmo Electrolux
Mar 6th, 2008, 01:50 PM
Fags... or royalty, you disrespectful asshole.

Look, you worthless, assl.....

Hey, did you know Christopher Hyatt died?