Log in

View Full Version : THE TIMESTAMP WAR


Chojin
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:20 PM
Okay guys we have three options here for post timestamps:

1. Full Timestamp
Format: January 29th, 2007 8:17 PM
This is how it was on the old boards and how it is right now.

2. Relative Timestamp
Format: 5 minutes ago
This is how it was when the vb boards started today. It reverts to the full timestamp after 24 hours. I personally prefer this as it makes the forums feel more active.

3. Combo Timestamp
Format: Today 8:19 PM
This is a 3rd option, it'd put 'today' or 'yesterday' behind the time, and a full timestamp if the post was before that.

VOTE.

Pub Lover
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:22 PM
When I first logged on I thought option 1. but option 2. has really grown on me so I vote 2.

Emu
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:24 PM
If you click the numbers it tells you who voted where

Fathom Zero you faggot

Chojin
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:27 PM
Pub, you need to actually vote. Dork.

Esuohlim
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:28 PM
Haha Fathom you fag.

:(

It really doesn't matter, but before I requested the change it still said "1 week ago" for old threads, and I didn't like that one bit no sir.

Pub Lover
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:29 PM
Pub, you need to actually vote. Dork.

The poll wasn't there when I responded to the thread, honest. :(

Emu
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:30 PM
Am I the only one here who enjoys combos?

http://www.candydirect.com/cleanimages/novelty/combos.jpg

Fathom Zero
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:31 PM
Goddamn, I'm gay.

executioneer
Jan 29th, 2007, 08:57 PM
oh man is there any way to fix the polls so they're anonymous, at least to non-mods :( NOT LIKE I DONT STAND BY MY OPIONION OR ANYTHING :x

Jixby Phillips
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:06 PM
Hey why come cant i have it say my OLD joindate like chojin has it?? WHY COME?

The earliest posts of mine that I could find on the ezboard were from August 2000, I'd guess I started posting earlier that summer maybe june or july, CHOJIN FIIIIX IT FIXXX IT

actually don't fix it, the idea of posting somehwere for more than half a decade is kind of sad. I'm sad! Don't you think I'm sad?

Esuohlim
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:06 PM
Am I the only one that checked some old poll threads hoping they wouldn't be anonymous :eek

liquidstatik
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:07 PM
relative timestamp<3

Emu
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:21 PM
i knew i could count on you jixby

Chojin
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:27 PM
Hey why come cant i have it say my OLD joindate like chojin has it?? WHY COME?

The earliest posts of mine that I could find on the ezboard were from August 2000, I'd guess I started posting earlier that summer maybe june or july, CHOJIN FIIIIX IT FIXXX IT

actually don't fix it, the idea of posting somehwere for more than half a decade is kind of sad. I'm sad! Don't you think I'm sad?
jix, there's a thread about this - 'the glory of the past...' if you can provide some links I can restore postcounts.

Chojin
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:29 PM
oh man is there any way to fix the polls so they're anonymous, at least to non-mods :( NOT LIKE I DONT STAND BY MY OPIONION OR ANYTHING :x
the default is anonymous polling, I just wanted to see what it looked like as CANDID POLLING

sadie
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:52 PM
polls suck. :(

Jixby Phillips
Jan 29th, 2007, 09:58 PM
Thanks Chojin thank you so much

I am in the thing you know, the thing

the other thread

noob3
Jan 29th, 2007, 10:01 PM
i want my original join date :x

executioneer
Jan 29th, 2007, 11:45 PM
polls suck. :(
i do still hate you polls >: ;)

Black Flag
Jan 30th, 2007, 12:47 AM
i wanted to put combo but i really don't want relative to win :(

it's like an election :(

Jixby Phillips
Jan 30th, 2007, 04:56 AM
Yeah, I voted combo for a sense of fairness but I really favor full over relative

GADZOOKS
Jan 30th, 2007, 06:27 AM
Combo is that terrible Boxer from Killer Instinct, so I picked relative because I like my relatives.

Emu
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:46 AM
Actually isn't there some way you can set it up so each person can choose which display mode is used? It seems weird that you'd have to set the entire forum to see it one way.

DuFresne
Jan 30th, 2007, 12:39 PM
hey emu can i be cool now to?

Esuohlim
Jan 30th, 2007, 12:46 PM
cool now to what?

Chojin
Jan 30th, 2007, 12:54 PM
RELATIVE TIMESTAMPS IS ONE VOTE SHY OF A MANDATE, GUYS :picklehat

Esuohlim
Jan 30th, 2007, 01:00 PM
Chojin you went into this knowing full well that mentioning your preference right off the bat would skew the popular opinion

noob3
Jan 30th, 2007, 01:15 PM
let's just do combo :x

Black Flag
Jan 30th, 2007, 01:28 PM
for real, then everyone will be happy

Chojin
Jan 30th, 2007, 02:22 PM
Chojin you went into this knowing full well that mentioning your preference right off the bat would skew the popular opinion
AH HA HA! AH HA HA! AH HA HA HA!

noob3
Jan 30th, 2007, 02:23 PM
man this imockery administration is crooked dudes we better rebel against them

GADZOOKS
Jan 30th, 2007, 02:34 PM
Can we have NO TIMESTAMPS and everything will be like mysterious.

liquidstatik
Jan 30th, 2007, 02:40 PM
whens this poll gonna be over? ;o

relative is tottally winning

Chojin
Jan 30th, 2007, 02:49 PM
it's set to 2 weeks.

Emu
Jan 30th, 2007, 04:34 PM
I feel that this thread is important enough to be a sticky

Juttin
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:15 PM
lol @ bad grammer manipulation

Emu
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:29 PM
grammAr

Jixby Phillips
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:33 PM
Question: Does relative timestamps fade after a certain ammount of time? Like I hate the idea of every post that happened 12-23 months ago would say ONE YEAR AGO on it. Like there are honestly times when I have to track down the date of something and I wind up using message board posts and stuff to gage that. Would I be able to get the actual date of a post by clicking the time stamp or something?

Emu
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:35 PM
All the posts have dates attached to them regardless of what kind of time stamp you have. Ideally though the combo timestamp would explire after two days and regress into a full timestamp after that period. I really don't get why people would want one or the other when you have both.

Black Flag
Jan 30th, 2007, 10:43 PM
honestly there is no reason not to do the combo

Emu
Jan 30th, 2007, 11:39 PM
Srsly.

Chojin
Jan 30th, 2007, 11:46 PM
Except the combo doesn't tell you a relative time, it just says 'yesterday' or 'today' or nothing next to a full timestamp. IDEALLY, we should have a full timestamp with (5 minutes ago) or something after it, but there's no option for that because that would be great.

Also Jix it's my understanding that the relative timestamp goes to a full after 24 hours, but i know fo sho it goes to a full one after a month or two.

Esuohlim
Jan 30th, 2007, 11:50 PM
As I mentioned before, this board started off with relative timestamps and I seriously saw "1 week ago" for all the threads at the bottom of General Blabber's page one.

You're making a big mistake here!

Chojin
Jan 30th, 2007, 11:53 PM
Well it was, wasn't it

zeldasbiggestfan
Jan 31st, 2007, 12:19 AM
Cant you just let us pick in our profile like how many posts per page?

sadie
Jan 31st, 2007, 06:08 AM
okay, well, zelda, this thread isn't about how many posts per page. moron.

and polls still suck, and who cares about timestamps anyway? what's the big deal?

DuFresne
Jan 31st, 2007, 11:19 AM
Question: Does relative timestamps fade after a certain ammount of time? Like I hate the idea of every post that happened 12-23 months ago would say ONE YEAR AGO on it. Like there are honestly times when I have to track down the date of something and I wind up using message board posts and stuff to gage that. Would I be able to get the actual date of a post by clicking the time stamp or something?

I think he makes a good point.