Log in

View Full Version : LEISURE SUIT LARRY IN 2004

James
Dec 8th, 2003, 06:45 PM
Finally, a new LSL game is coming out... Except Al Lowe isn't involved, it's not a point-and-click adventure game, and it's not even Larry Laffer (it's his nephew, Larry Lovage).

So, umm... hmm... Yay, or Fuck?
Mockery
Dec 8th, 2003, 08:33 PM
:domosleep
Cap'n Crunch
Dec 8th, 2003, 10:29 PM
It looked really gay from GameInformer. They did a whole 10 page review and it looked REALLY cartoony. I might rent it maybe, but it won't be as good or funny.
Anonymous
Dec 8th, 2003, 10:40 PM
It looked really gay from GameInformer. They did a whole 10 page review and it looked REALLY cartoony.

I'm by no means a fan of the series, but you, sir, are a frigging retard.
Cap'n Crunch
Dec 8th, 2003, 10:46 PM
No, it looked like fucking Jimmy Neutron cartoony. >: I don't know what the ones that aren't 8-bit look like.
James
Dec 8th, 2003, 11:23 PM
Yeah, the style is the 3-D low-detail cartoonish look. I never particularly liked that style, and would have preferred a cel-shaded or 2-D game.

I was a fan of the series, because as I've stated before, I have a huge fucking hardon for point-and-click adventure games. Unfortunately, this won't be in the same vein as the past games.

I was so happy to hear that LSL came out of death, but then it's not even LSL anymore. :(
McClain
Dec 9th, 2003, 03:16 AM
I was a fan of the series, because as I've stated before, I have a huge fucking hardon for point-and-click adventure games.

No, you were like everyone else who played this game: You were a fan because you're a wanker and were hoping to see some cartoon porn.
James
Dec 9th, 2003, 04:30 AM
No, that's why I was a big fan of King's Quest. Fag.

Did you ever SEE the Leisure Suit Larry games? I feel bad for the person that played those with the desire to see nudity/porn.
Rongi
Dec 9th, 2003, 04:01 PM
Yeah, the style is the 3-D low-detail cartoonish look. I never particularly liked that style, and would have preferred a cel-shaded

You're an idiot.
James
Dec 9th, 2003, 09:10 PM
Why would that be? I hate cel-shaded, because it's becoming an overused fad and an easy solution for most games. But when done right, it works really well (Sly Cooper, for example).

With a Larry game, they've ALWAYS been played out to be cartoonish, both in graphics and style. So I'd rather see it kept in that same vein of looking like a cartoon, instead of low-detailed 3D models.

Don't see what's so idiotic about that. But then again, you are Rongi, so I don't know why I bothered to put so much thought into something you said. :/
Rongi
Dec 9th, 2003, 09:15 PM
Wait a minute

You say that you would perfer a cel-shaded LSL to a 3D cartoony LSL. Then you go on to say that you wouldn't perfer a cel-shaded LSL....

You're an idiot :lol
James
Dec 10th, 2003, 12:24 AM
When did I say I wouldn't prefer cel-shaded for a LSL game, if it's going to be in full 3D?
executioneer
Dec 10th, 2003, 04:08 AM
he's saying, he'd rather play a "cartoon" game than a "3D" game, but if it has to be "3D" they should make it "cel-shaded" so it's closer to being a "cartoon".

I think.

-willie
AChimp
Dec 10th, 2003, 10:24 AM
They should just go back to 256-colour 300x200 graphics. >:
James
Dec 10th, 2003, 11:37 AM
he's saying, he'd rather play a "cartoon" game than a "3D" game, but if it has to be "3D" they should make it "cel-shaded" so it's closer to being a "cartoon".

I think.

-willie

Yes, if they're going to make 3D models (which they are), I would have preferred cel-shaded graphics, which give it a 2d, animated look, instead of the low-detailed textures that you see in South Park and Simpsons games (which they are).