Log in

View Full Version : Looks like Bush might try to play that 9/11 card again


Mockery
Feb 2nd, 2004, 12:47 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4065772

milk it for all it's worth baby. :rolleyes

mburbank
Feb 2nd, 2004, 01:30 PM
I see the logic in replacing a guy who's had dozens of heart attacks with a guy who has cancer.

Plus, Guliani has never been the head of Halliburton.

KevinTheOmnivore
Feb 2nd, 2004, 02:16 PM
This has been rumored for a very long time. There's a reason the RNC is in New York this year....

Guliani is very popular, although I had heard rumors of him replacing Ashcroft, but who knows. Another guy on the VP list would probably be Governor Pataki, who makes good sense as a running-mate. He's viewed as a moderate Republican, he's coming off a sound re-election victory in 2002, and he has also been a monster fundraiser for Bush in New York.

Putting either of these guys on the ticket would give Bush a shot at the coup of a life time, taking NY this Fall. NY is a Democratic strong hold, but upstate NY is more conservative, someplaces VERY conservative.

I know Guliani was considering ruinning for senate though against madame Hillary.....

Buffalo Tom
Feb 2nd, 2004, 02:28 PM
I see the logic in replacing a guy who's had dozens of heart attacks with a guy who has cancer.

Plus, Guliani has never been the head of Halliburton.

On the other hand, Dubya's certain not to get the Charlie Manson vote. Sacrifices have to be made, I guess.

Why do I get the feeling that Dubya probably never heard of this development until today. That guy has more strings pulling him than Howdy Doody.

El Blanco
Feb 2nd, 2004, 03:10 PM
Rudy is a megalomaniac, so he needs his own department to control, not a VP slot. Thats why I think he will be the new AG. I still say Rice is their best bet as VP. She is qualified and it takes the legs out from under Hillary in 2008.

mburbank
Feb 2nd, 2004, 03:17 PM
I agree he's way better suited to AG personality wise, but VP is a more natural springboard to the Presidency.

People seem to think that his heroic behavior during and after 9/11 (and it really was heroic, no argument) innoculates him permanently against the fact that he was kind of loony in a lot of ways. I wonder.
Plus, he's not exactly Mr. Family values.

Cheney has publicly stated he intends to continue on as VP. Do people just dismiss this out of hand?

Abcdxxxx
Feb 2nd, 2004, 05:30 PM
He doesn't call it "Family Values", he has his own name for it....which Im blanking on, but he started all those committees , and attempted to start up some others, for what pretty much amounted to Family Values.

When Guiliani was the DA in New York, he fancied himself as the next coming of Robert Kennedy, fighting the Mob (and he actually won to be honest).

He doesn't get along with Pataki, but there's been talk of it being the dream ticket for two years now. Guiliani's going to want something in the way of a Senate or Governors kind of job. He's a wild canon.

KevinTheOmnivore
Feb 2nd, 2004, 06:08 PM
He doesn't get along with Pataki, but there's been talk of it being the dream ticket for two years now. Guiliani's going to want something in the way of a Senate or Governors kind of job. He's a wild canon.

Yeah, they'd never ever ever be on the same ticket. They wouldn't be a very good ticket, either. Both tend to be fairly "liberal" on certain issues. Pataki is pro-choice, and I forget where Guliani stands on the issue this week. He is "America's mayor," but he also has a history of ideological inconsistency, as well as a few blemishes here and there as mayor of NYC.

I can however see one of these guys being a good VP choice. I think Pataki's ego would be more agreeable. Guliani would probably be the most vocal VP ever.

Pub Lover
Feb 3rd, 2004, 09:13 AM
Agnostic Front - Police State

New York police state!
New York police state!
New York police state!
New York police state!

New York we hate you!
New York we hate you!
New York we hate you!

Guliani Guliani Guliani fuck you!
Guliani Guliani Guliani fuck you!

New York police state!
New York police state!
New York police state!
New York police state!

New York we hate you!
New York we hate you!
New York we hate you!

Guliani Guliani Guliani fuck you!
Guliani Guliani Guliani fuck you!

New York we hate you!
New York we hate you!
New York we hate you!

Guliani Guliani Guliani fuck you die!

:unhelpful

mburbank
Feb 3rd, 2004, 11:54 AM
I think W. campaign stratgey is going to be wall to wall non stop to the exclusion of everything else 9/11.

"I was a great leader right after 9/11 so I should get re-elected"

First of all, I think that's highly debatable, unless he means the part between when he stopped flying all over the country and the part where the EPA lied about toxins in Manhattan's air.

Second, I think it's deeply cynical and can be played against him.

But... What the hell else is he going to run on?

The wonderful state of the economy?

How well things are going in Iraq and Afghanistan?

How we beat Al Quaeda?

Command Prompt
Feb 3rd, 2004, 12:04 PM
Isn't the debt up a trillion dollars or something because of the war?

theapportioner
Feb 3rd, 2004, 11:47 PM
I still say Rice is their best bet as VP. She is qualified and it takes the legs out from under Hillary in 2008.

A possibility, but IMO this is risky for Bush, especially if the intelligence scandal continues to swell. The more prudent thing to do is put her in as Secretary of State, maybe.

El Blanco
Feb 3rd, 2004, 11:53 PM
And do what with Powell? He is deffinatly qualified to be VP, but why npot go for broke with Rice?

theapportioner
Feb 3rd, 2004, 11:54 PM
He was pretty frustrated with the whole push towards war, and I think there's a good chance he won't stick around for a 2nd term.

theapportioner
Feb 3rd, 2004, 11:57 PM
Besides, there have been whispers for a while now about Powell getting kicked out if Bush is reelected. I suspect they may be true.

mburbank
Feb 4th, 2004, 09:39 AM
He's not sticking around. He said yesterday if he'd known there wee no WMD he might have questioned going to war in Iraq. I know that's pretty weak protest, but with Bush sticking to his 'what's the difference' line, it's pretty bald criticism.

The_Rorschach
Feb 4th, 2004, 06:40 PM
I may not vote this time around :(