PDA

View Full Version : Goldeneye 2


eggyolk
Feb 28th, 2004, 12:07 PM
What the hell are they thinking? http://www.gamespot.com/gamecube/action/jamesbond007goldeneye2/news_6090269.html

ScruU2wice
Feb 28th, 2004, 12:32 PM
It doesn't sound that bad to me. There's no way it'll be as good as the original, but you can't really get anyones attention about a James Bond game anymore unless you say goldeneye :/

camacazio
Feb 28th, 2004, 06:52 PM
The idea of it made me think how stupid video games are these days. Being the villains is actually kinda cool, though. Either way, I don't care much. Just like for the N64, I'd only be in it for the multiplayer.

DamnthatDavid
Feb 29th, 2004, 02:08 AM
The only way a villian game is good is if you win at the end as the villian. Like GTA VC. I want to kill bond.

but the Multiplayer aspect will be cool. They need to also make it for X-Box, so we can play some lan games with many people.

drunkbrigade
Feb 29th, 2004, 05:24 AM
I just hope it doesnt turn out to be another "agent under fire" style FPS. If anything RARE needs to do another James bond game.
But I also heard that 'Everything or nothing' isnt that bad.

pjalne
Mar 1st, 2004, 05:52 AM
If Grace Jones isn't a playable character I'm not interested.

Command Prompt
Mar 6th, 2004, 10:43 PM
There's no way it'll be as good as the original

WTF are you talking about you brown bastard? How HARD can it be to top a fucking N64 game?

YeiPi
Mar 6th, 2004, 11:09 PM
you can't really get anyones attention about a James Bond game anymore unless you say goldeneye :/

I agree with u on that screw, from my point of veiw, the only relation this game will have with the original is the name, from what I've read, it will be a completely new Bond adventure, but with reapperances of old villians, wich is kinda kool, I've always wanted to play as Goldfinger or Max Zorin (is it misspelled?) in a different scenario than Multiplayer, adn there is no more satisfactory moment that when the bad guys win.

Bubsy
Mar 6th, 2004, 11:52 PM
the originakl was cool i can't ewait for this!

ScruU2wice
Mar 7th, 2004, 12:38 AM
WTF are you talking about you brown bastard? How HARD can it be to top a fucking N64 game?

The best bond title. and the best n64 game of the year. You can imporve on the graphics, thats about it. Adding anymore guns would oversaturate it, same with more characters. Goldeneye had two very hard secret levels to unlock, any more would be like extending the game. What else could you do to improve the game... :/

timrpgland
Mar 8th, 2004, 02:13 PM
They tryed improving on Goldeneye, it's called Perfect Dark. Fell short though since it lacked style. Perfect Dark had alot of multiplayer goodies though.

I'm not really interested in this one. Only Bond game I've enjoyed is Goldeneye.

ScruU2wice
Mar 8th, 2004, 06:24 PM
I didn't like Perfect dark because it had those cheater guns that went through walls and once someone got those who new how to use them well I never had a chance. And didn't it need one of those expansion pack things :(

ScruU2wice
Mar 8th, 2004, 06:25 PM
edit:double post :(

HickMan
Mar 10th, 2004, 08:18 PM
If they add the orignal goldeneye as a bonus that you can play on live, that would be worth more then 50 dollars.

Ant10708
Mar 11th, 2004, 05:39 PM
That would be great but its not going to happen since the orginal Goldeneye was made by a different company.

Eternal_Champion
Mar 14th, 2004, 01:44 PM
I thought it was a bad idea even before i knew EA were doing it.
EA are definately gonna fuck it up. Their other Bond games are a completely different style than Goldeneye, and they're crap

eggyolk
Mar 14th, 2004, 02:47 PM
If they add the orignal goldeneye as a bonus that you can play on live, that would be worth more then 50 dollars.

That would totally rule. The graphics would be kinda blocky though. If they just redid the graphics, then ported it to PC/X-Box Live, I think they'd have a good seller.