Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News > The blame
Reload this Page Reply to Thread
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: The blame Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:56 PM
kellychaos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Raygun
Hind sight is 20/20.

Sure now that we can look back, we can say it was the wrong thing to do. But some people here make it seem as if we gave him chemical weapons just so he would kill innocent people.

It's not true.
That explanation for our government and it's intelligence community gets a little old after a while. They go in, back one side or the other depending on whatever serves their interest, leave that country a mess and then wonder why, years later, trajedies like the WTC happen. I'm not saying that our government is totally at fault, but let's take a little responisibility somewhere in here. There's a reason (besides being jealous of our wealth, resources, ect.) that other nations hate the U.S. so much.
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:50 PM
KevinTheOmnivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Raygun
Sorry Kevin, I disagree with your opinion.
And the facts disagree w/ yours. I'm sorry.
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:48 PM
Ronnie Raygun We did not give Saddam chemical weapons.

It was not our will that he would use them against anyone.

Sorry Kevin, I disagree with your opinion.
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:26 PM
KevinTheOmnivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Raygun
The same chemicals could have been used to produce plastics.
Lets not be naive. The CIA had its hand it everything going on over there, since we were still technically in the Cold War.

Quote:
Keep in mind that it was a 10 year war with Iran. A country might need to produce such a thing as plastics in a ten year span.
Heh, it's funny that you wouldn't conceed such a thing now though, even though Iraq proved to be much worse to foreign enemies THEN than it is NOW.

Quote:
Sure now that we can look back, we can say it was the wrong thing to do. But some people here make it seem as if we gave him chemical weapons just so he would kill innocent people.

It's not true.
Again, ignorance is bliss. If you think we didn't know it was going on, you're wrong.
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:18 PM
Ronnie Raygun The same chemicals could have been used to produce plastics.

Keep in mind that it was a 10 year war with Iran. A country might need to produce such a thing as plastics in a ten year span.

Hind sight is 20/20.

Sure now that we can look back, we can say it was the wrong thing to do. But some people here make it seem as if we gave him chemical weapons just so he would kill innocent people.

It's not true.
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:13 PM
KevinTheOmnivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronnie Raygun
Do you have any idea how many dual use chemical agents exist? We've given the very same materials to many nations who haven't used them for that purpose.
Again, this is like the hand in the cookie jar theory. It isn't a crime until it backfires in your face.

Sell chemicals to a dictator who is at war, and what shall he do with them, make cocktails?
Mar 3rd, 2003 01:57 PM
Anonymous FABULOUS
Mar 3rd, 2003 01:56 PM
Protoclown Yes, I suppose I should have come to you originally for help with saying that JUST the right way...
Mar 3rd, 2003 01:54 PM
Ronnie Raygun It should have been "THAT'S CLEAR NUFF".
Mar 3rd, 2003 01:53 PM
Anonymous URANIUM MAKES A FABULOUS DETERGENT
Mar 3rd, 2003 01:38 PM
Protoclown IT'S DEM QUEERS AND FAGETS WHAT'S RESPONSIBLE, THAT'S CLEAR ENOUGH
Mar 3rd, 2003 12:05 PM
Ronnie Raygun Do you have any idea how many dual use chemical agents exist? We've given the very same materials to many nations who haven't used them for that purpose.
Mar 3rd, 2003 11:22 AM
happy_dude Ummm...... Who was in office when the U.S sold weapons grade Bio/chemical agents to Saddam to help him fight Iran?

I blame him.
Mar 3rd, 2003 09:38 AM
Malevolent I chose France because it's what Al Bundy would have chosen.
Mar 3rd, 2003 02:47 AM
KevinTheOmnivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Blanco
So you want to punish the cops who enforce the laws these kids break?
I think you missed the analogy....
Mar 3rd, 2003 01:28 AM
ranxer their both responsible, both crazy, and both sacraficing thier own people for thier power
Mar 2nd, 2003 08:46 PM
El Blanco
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinTheHerbivore
And if a kid deals drugs to another kid, we should ONLY punish the kid who sold the drugs, not the person they got them from.
So you want to punish the cops who enforce the laws these kids break?
Mar 2nd, 2003 08:27 PM
Paul138 Betcha that kid's dealing heroin. How do you think he got that tricycle? HMMMM!?!?
Mar 1st, 2003 08:37 PM
KevinTheOmnivore And if a kid deals drugs to another kid, we should ONLY punish the kid who sold the drugs, not the person they got them from.
Mar 1st, 2003 07:34 PM
El Blanco Why should we blame the guy who actually drops the gas on his people? Thats so old fashioned. What we need to to do is find as many people to blame, or find as big a target as possible to blame.

Thats how we do things in this country.
Mar 1st, 2003 07:24 PM
KevinTheOmnivore Bombs: I chose Bush, cuz that's the way I've always heard it should be. :carlysimon
Mar 1st, 2003 02:55 PM
Zebra 3
The Blame Game
- It's always been Saddam for fuck sakes!
Mar 1st, 2003 11:43 AM
BombsBurstingInAir
The blame
I say Sodom.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.

I-Mockery.com - Archive - Top

© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.