|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
May 27th, 2009 08:16 PM | ||
Womti |
yeah but I have myself added as a friend on my buddy list. |
|
May 19th, 2009 01:15 AM | ||
Esuohlim | Good job elx | |
May 18th, 2009 09:54 PM | ||
elx | ||
Dec 20th, 2008 01:21 AM | ||
Fathom Zero | Be relevent; have a point, lah. | |
Dec 18th, 2008 07:08 PM | ||
fluffkomix |
ouch. especially mine? |
|
Dec 18th, 2008 05:33 PM | ||
Esuohlim | I hate all threads, by the way | |
Dec 18th, 2008 04:41 PM | ||
fluffkomix | got it thanks | |
Dec 18th, 2008 01:41 AM | ||
Esuohlim |
It depends on how much I like the thread. For example, don't bump the manga thread unless you want to see a fit of rage |
|
Dec 17th, 2008 08:25 PM | ||
pac-man |
I'd much rather try my limits with a moderator than a drill instructor. Go nuts, Fluffy. Bump the oldest thread you can find with a response that only contains an emote. Create threads aplenty. It's your world, squirrel. |
|
Dec 17th, 2008 05:54 PM | ||
Tadao | Just ask yourself. Is this information useful or funny? | |
Dec 17th, 2008 05:36 PM | ||
Kitsa |
The sooner you learn that it's entirely at the whim of those in control, the better. You might as well tap politely on your marine drill instructor's shoulder and ask why he wants you to do pushups. |
|
Dec 17th, 2008 05:29 PM | ||
fluffkomix | also how old does a thread have to be before its considered bumping it? | |
Dec 17th, 2008 04:58 PM | ||
Kitsa | I think that incurring infractions and then pestering the good authority figures here about it is sort of akin to making sure the kindling is neatly stacked around your own stake for maximum oxygenation. | |
Dec 17th, 2008 04:48 PM | ||
Grislygus | ||
Dec 17th, 2008 11:15 AM | ||
fluffkomix | wouldn't be surprised. he sure does like giving them out | |
Dec 17th, 2008 09:08 AM | ||
pac-man |
Quote:
|
|
Dec 17th, 2008 04:32 AM | ||
executioneer | actually i think it depends on the severity of the infraction, if they're still using the same system they were before | |
Dec 17th, 2008 02:13 AM | ||
fluffkomix | so, in essence, if i get an infraction, and then i do it again, i can get banned, but on the other hand, if i get an infraction, it expires, and then i do it again a second later, then i can get away with it again, just so long as they dont believe im just doing it to bullshit thru the rules? | |
Dec 16th, 2008 10:07 PM | ||
fluffkomix | im sure if i did that my nose would be colored brown | |
Dec 16th, 2008 09:25 PM | ||
Tadao | You should have your nose rubbed in that thread! | |
Dec 16th, 2008 09:19 PM | ||
Tadao | No | |
Dec 16th, 2008 09:14 PM | ||
Mockery | indeed it is | |
Dec 16th, 2008 08:51 PM | ||
Esuohlim | Hey if you think a thread called "fingerless gloves" containing content merely saying "are awesome!" isn't considered excessive then that's your call | |
Dec 16th, 2008 08:35 PM | ||
Mockery | They're simply warnings to you, the user, to let you know that something you did was against the rules. Most of the time, said warnings are warranted, so pay attention to 'em. | |
Dec 16th, 2008 08:04 PM | ||
fluffkomix | and no one has actually answered me yet... | |
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |