Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Movies & Television > King Kong
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Thread: King Kong Reply to Thread
Title:
Message
Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Dec 19th, 2005 06:17 PM
Ivan Raged YOU BITCH!!!!
Dec 19th, 2005 03:02 AM
Marine oh noes they killed the black dude and the chineese guy
Dec 18th, 2005 10:45 PM
Protoclown I enjoyed the hell out of it. It may have been long, but it was great eye candy. I loved the fight with the T-Rexes and the Empire State Building scene was a joy to watch.
Dec 18th, 2005 09:03 PM
Comrade Rocket NAOMI WATTS
Dec 18th, 2005 05:14 PM
the_dudefather just came back from seeing it.

and it was awesome. some scenes did drag on a bit, but it all came togather great. all the little nods to the original movie were great and of course....

the RAT MONKEY CAGE!

who knows, it might lead to king kong 2: kong Vs lionels mother
Dec 18th, 2005 02:12 AM
GADZOOKS If it were like that, then genius would be stupid and you would be the king.
Dec 18th, 2005 12:25 AM
Ivan Raged what if it were like this?

Dec 17th, 2005 11:33 PM
GADZOOKS The t-rex fight was so stupid I had to laugh.

I TOOK A NAP AFTER 2 HOURS AND WHEN I WOKE UP THE MONKEY WAS DEAD.

you know it's an ape, you retard :dorkwhowantsto correct me
Dec 17th, 2005 11:20 PM
executioneer who gives a dang
Dec 17th, 2005 06:38 PM
Zebra 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spectre X
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Melvin
Quote:
hope he makes a braindead / bad taste sequel after this
Fat chance. (pun intended 'cause Peter Jackson is fat lol)
Obviously you haven't seen Jackson lately. The man is thin as a rail.
But he still doesn't bathe...

Quote:
Originally Posted by DamnthatDavid
All in all, way better then that 80's remake shit.
The King Kong remake was released in 1976.
Dec 17th, 2005 04:16 PM
Wiffle Bat I personally think it was quite good, 3 hours is kinda long but after I left the theater, I felt I got the bang for my money and didnt feel ripped off like most 60 - 70 minute movies ~

Plus the pacing is quite good for a 3 hour movie, could have been shorter but satisfactory nontheless. It was also more faithful a remake to the old 1933 classic ^^
Dec 17th, 2005 03:26 AM
pjalne King Kong more like Orson Welles: Monster Hunter

This movie was way better than I thought it would be, it totally kicked my ass. But Jackson better not be releasing an extended DVD. It's a GOOD movie about a big ape, but it's still basically a movie about a big ape. Three hours is more than enough.
Dec 17th, 2005 12:56 AM
Comrade Rocket i just remembered Naomi Watts was in Tank girl

x 2
Dec 16th, 2005 12:03 AM
Comrade Rocket <3 the t-rex fight. That was like the best part of the movie.

and noami watts
Dec 15th, 2005 10:34 PM
HickMan Jeff Bridges Shirtless
Dec 15th, 2005 10:08 PM
DamnthatDavid I saw the midnight release. Sure, getting home at 3:30 a.m. just to get up for my job at 4:30 a.m. was crappy, but it, in my opinion, was fucking worth it.

The movie rolled, only once did I check my watch, and that was to confirm that it took about a hour just to see Kong. Yet, it has backstory, it has depth, I enjoyed it.

All in all, way better then that 80's remake shit.
Dec 15th, 2005 08:50 PM
Studio8 I heard people were slipping on banana peels to get in there on opening day.
Dec 15th, 2005 08:47 AM
Mad Melvin I dont get it. Maybe i'm just a simple minded fool, but please, make me understand.
Dec 15th, 2005 02:25 AM
Rez not impressed, eh?!
oh-ho, he was NOT impressed!
oh no, sir.. he surely was not impressed

Dec 15th, 2005 02:07 AM
Spectre X
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Melvin
Quote:
hope he makes a braindead / bad taste sequel after this
Fat chance. (pun intended 'cause Peter Jackson is fat lol)
Obviously you haven't seen Jackson lately. The man is thin as a rail.

Also: Show some god damned fortitude, people. Three hours is a cakewalk.
Dec 14th, 2005 08:02 PM
N00bKill3R I actually wanted to see this but after hearing about the length I'm having some serious doubts. I wasn't really expecting much but I haven't been to the picture show in a while.
Dec 14th, 2005 06:30 PM
ArrowX I think its because Jackson wanted the Scene on the island to be the most memorable part of the movie (as it was in his childhood) so he pretty much pulled a whole lot of needless scenes.

And whats this I hear about Kong no longer killing the T-Rex by cramming a tree down its throat and breaking its neck?
Dec 14th, 2005 04:18 PM
the_dudefather yeah bit wierd that thats nearly twice as long as the original
Dec 14th, 2005 04:04 PM
Mad Melvin
Quote:
hope he makes a braindead / bad taste sequel after this
Fat chance. (pun intended 'cause Peter Jackson is fat lol)

Anyway, the thing that bugged me the most was the lenght. Why the hell did this have to be over 3 hours long, especially when there really wasnt any good reasons for it. :/
Dec 14th, 2005 03:52 PM
the_dudefather im going to see this on saturday, been looking forward to it for a while, being a fan of the original movie and of peter jackson's other movies (hope he makes a braindead / bad taste sequel after this :P)
This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.