|FAQ||Members List||Calendar||Search||Today's Posts||Mark Forums Read|
|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|Mar 16th, 2010 03:18 PM|
|Dimnos||I want to hear one of these joke before passing judgment on them.|
|Mar 16th, 2010 01:51 PM|
|Mar 16th, 2010 01:43 PM|
|Mar 16th, 2010 01:38 PM|
|Pentegarn||Finally! I can break out my "He put the dick in Pope Benedict" jokes!|
|Mar 16th, 2010 01:36 PM|
|Tadao||In real news, a big sex scandal in Germany is bursting and it looks to be dmamging to the current pope.|
|Mar 16th, 2010 01:07 PM|
Hail to the Pope!
|Mar 16th, 2010 11:35 AM|
|The Leader||Coolinator, if you're so against people being sheep then why are you one?|
|Mar 16th, 2010 09:08 AM|
|Mar 16th, 2010 12:42 AM|
|Mar 15th, 2010 09:19 PM|
The Lord is my bunny
I shall not want
for a Mr. Softee cone
|Mar 15th, 2010 05:53 PM|
|Pentegarn||I think the Father, Son and Holy Ghost all like Tadao's new bunny avatar|
|Mar 15th, 2010 10:33 AM|
I thought we were supposed to talk about Catholicism in this thread.
(we do have a GW thread, you know.)
|Mar 15th, 2010 09:33 AM|
|TheCoolinator||Linked to global warming thread|
|Mar 13th, 2010 05:09 PM|
So if you're attacking global warming "from the left", then how come you're using a spectacularly dense argument that I've seen used, VERBATIM, by Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly on their respective programs in the last month alone?
GEE DA SCIENTISTS SAID DAT OVERADUNDANT CARBON AND DUH CO2 LEVELS CAN THEORETICALLY AID IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LONG-TERM NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES. THEY MUST BE CLAIMING DAT ITS UH POLLUTANT HUH HUH HUH WHAT A BUNCH OF TOOLS
|Mar 13th, 2010 05:08 PM|
|Grislygus||So if you're attacking global warming "from the left", then how come you're using a spectacularly DOUBLER POST MY CELL PHONE INTERNET IS BEING AN UNCOOPERATIVE RECALCITRANT BITCH SEND HELP BEFORE ITS TOO LA|
|Mar 13th, 2010 02:24 PM|
|Evil Robot||"Gaps do not get filled by ignoring them"|
|Mar 10th, 2010 10:42 PM|
|Supafly345||His piece of information.|
|Mar 10th, 2010 09:22 PM|
|Mar 10th, 2010 03:15 PM|
Is it peace or piece? hmmmm...
|Mar 10th, 2010 03:06 PM|
I BELIEVE EVRYTNG I READ ON TEH INTERWEBS! GOOGLE RULEZ!
I said it before, and I say it again. Naive.
|Mar 10th, 2010 01:55 PM|
Search engine it.
|Mar 10th, 2010 12:17 PM|
|Tadao||It's a cloud of nonsensical talking points.|
|Mar 10th, 2010 12:02 PM|
|Mar 10th, 2010 11:58 AM|
|Mar 10th, 2010 10:10 AM|
STOP CARBON!!!! ....even though its not a pollutant and has nothing to do with the warming cycle and is actually beneficial for plant development.......
What they need to do is instead of attempting to create a carbon bubble which would lower all of our living standards similar to when gasoline was 5 dollars a gallon, they should be pumping money into clean energy.
Solar panels on everyones house
Hydrogen (Brown's gas)
and so on and so forth. Just these industrial drivers alone would create millions of jobs but they don't want to do that. They just want to harp on CARBON CARBON CARBON....which makes no sense. Carbon is not a pollutant. Its a beneficial gas. Why aren't the global warming priests harping on how they need to ban hexanes, Volatile organic compounds, diesel fuel (replace it with biodiesel), mercury oxides, arsenic oxides, sulpher oxides, nitrogen oxides, petroleum based fertilizers and herbicides, fungicides, rodenticides, depleted uranium, all of these need to be regulated out of existance but all they focus on is CARBON....OOOOOOO CARBON.....
Ok, I guess i backed up my point and I'm a little bit closer to break time. Woot!
|This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|