I-Mockery Forum - Reply to Topic

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options Automatically parse links in text

Dec 4th, 2003 03:42 PM

kellychaos

Thank you for not banning me.

Dec 4th, 2003 09:18 AM

FartinMowler

Quote:

I bet dollars to donuts that there is a correlation between those posters who are making the boards 'shitty' and those who have never posted their picture in the PYPH thread

Maxb never posts his pic. I don't post as much anymore because no one is nice to me. No correlation there.

Dec 2nd, 2003 11:24 PM

Anonymous

Quote:

I'm well aware of what you 'said'.
I was making a joke of synonymity.
Or to be more accurate, & less stupid, it had to do with sexism...

well when you said that I saw how someone could have interpreted that I meant it that way but I didn't.
I am far too old to refer in that way a 13 yr old boy as a loser

Dec 2nd, 2003 10:20 PM

executioneer

HEY

-willie

Dec 2nd, 2003 09:11 PM

AChimp

Quote:

I would happily ban, but Rog is in charge here. And there are some people who I thought should blatantly be banned that he said no to. He just doesn't like to ban people

You should so cut him off.

Dec 2nd, 2003 08:50 PM

soundtest

If someone floods the board with incessant bullshit, especially if it's a particularly annoying character, sure. Otherwise who really gives a fuck? You complain about the 'quality' of the posts on this board. Well, as I'm sure you're well aware, it is interactive so you could do something about the quality instead of bitching about it. You suggest that others should 'take a break' because they are getting too 'stale'. I'm not implying anything here but wouldn't it be more logical for you to do that? If you expect the board to totally entertain you and you do nothing to contribute to it, you're setting yourself up for disappointment. People you think who are unfunny are probably pretty funny to me and vice versa. Perhaps I should be banned? Or ban myself.

If I was administrator/god anybody who posted one line with a

at the end would be auto-banned.

Dec 2nd, 2003 08:41 PM

Pub Lover

I'm well aware of what you 'said'.

I was making a joke of synonymity.

Or to be more accurate, & less stupid, it had to do with sexism...

Edit: Sountest's next post is excellent.

Dec 2nd, 2003 08:36 PM

Anonymous

Quote:

She should ban the lot of us '13 year old losers'.

I said 'boys' not 'losers'

Quote:

I bet she also has the BALLS to do it that Mock obviously LACKS.

I would happily ban, but Rog is in charge here. And there are some people who I thought should blatantly be banned that he said no to. He just doesn't like to ban people

Dec 2nd, 2003 07:56 PM

soundtest

i'd never expect a triad to talk like a politician. i'm asking for SPECIFIC NAMES.

Dec 2nd, 2003 07:54 PM

Triad-Brother Choi

The level of shitness is quite insipid.

Anyone that has signed up in the last six months is ripe for banning, but then without new people the boards will be just as stale as they are now.

It's the repeativeness of the people, & the generic 'characters' that turnup. We need some truely fresh blood.

Also, I think, more of the 'vets' should take breaks from this site, & the internet in general. When Professer Cool, hopefully Jaegar, & others return, they will be fresher, & should be able to improve the general quality around here.

Dec 2nd, 2003 07:46 PM

soundtest

Seriously, who do you guys recommend be banned?

Dec 2nd, 2003 07:03 PM

AChimp

I bet she also has the BALLS to do it that Mock obviously LACKS.

Dec 2nd, 2003 06:59 PM

Pub Lover

Doopa's an admin. She can ban. Surely she has the foresight that her husband doesn't. She should ban the lot of us '13 year old losers'.

Dec 2nd, 2003 06:48 PM

soundtest

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carnivore

And we need to summarily execute a dozen current posters.

Specific names would help and make things more interesting.

Dec 1st, 2003 09:44 PM

Carnivore

Summary executions!

Dec 1st, 2003 09:42 PM

Anonymous

you have to be a 13 year old boy to post here now I think

Dec 1st, 2003 09:15 PM

Carnivore

Verily, I agree. I can go days without looking at this board now. Back in the day, I could only go a few hours. We need some kind of application process to join. And we need to summarily execute a dozen current posters.

Dec 1st, 2003 09:12 PM

Anonymous

this board is not addicting anymore. It used to be yeah

Dec 1st, 2003 06:26 PM

noob3

what the fuck happene to your face

Dec 1st, 2003 05:53 PM

kellychaos

Hey! That was me.

Nov 29th, 2003 06:45 PM

Helm

I like it when people ask me how long it took me to grow my hair out to their current length. Especially women. I take it as an upportunity to, after an intentional pause, look the person who inquires straight between the eyes and proclaim that ´I am against premarital intercourse.´ and then wink like she knows I know she knows but she's got problems. It happens when I'm playing pool most of the time. Biker bitches, that sort of thing. They like the hairs. Not that I would know, actually as I'm making all of this up. I've never left my basement in my life.

Nov 29th, 2003 03:20 PM

JesusFishSticks

Nov 29th, 2003 12:28 PM

kellychaos

Now yer jes playin' hard to get.

Nov 26th, 2003 07:44 PM

soundtest

I bet dollars to donuts that there is a correlation between those posters who are making the boards 'shitty' and those who have never posted their picture in the PYPH thread. Is it that they are too afraid of repurcussion because they know they act like fucking idiots on here, or do they act like idiots because they are so anonymous? Chicken or the egg... with a knife kellychaos. a KNIFE

Nov 26th, 2003 04:53 PM

kellychaos

Of course, by "patch" I meant whatever it is with which you line your panties.

This thread has more than 25 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

About Us |

Store |

Advertising |

Contact

Features

Shorts

Editorials

Games

Comics

Blogs

Forum

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off