|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Topic Review (Newest First) |
Mar 11th, 2007 04:48 PM | |
Chojin | i use diskeeper, because the defragger that comes with windows is actually just an older version of their software. Also I've found that not all defraggers are created equal, as the windows one will lump files together, but newer ones will then lump those lumps together by category (system files / documents / programs, etc). |
Mar 10th, 2007 07:02 PM | |
AChimp | The Windows one is fine. |
Mar 10th, 2007 12:24 PM | |
Archduke Tips | There are many defrag programs out there. If you think about it, they all pretty much do the same thing. They just move the fragments of files together on the hard disk so that your computer can read them quicker. The only benefits of the commercial defrag programs is that they tend to finish the job faster than the standard one that comes with windows. |
Mar 8th, 2007 09:48 PM | |
BlueOatmeal |
Quality Defraggers I was just wondering if there were any super awesome defraggers for windows or is just using the windows one fine? |