I-Mockery Forum

I-Mockery Forum (http://i-mockery.com/forum/index.php)
-   Philosophy, Politics, and News (http://i-mockery.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Home run "king" indicted (http://i-mockery.com/forum/showthread.php?t=69698230)

Geggy Nov 16th, 2007 07:58 AM

Home run "king" indicted
 
Good thing I sold all of his rookie cards, although it wasnt much but still enough to get myself a 12 pack.

http://boston.redsox.mlb.com/news/ar...=.jsp&c_id=mlb

Emu Nov 16th, 2007 09:31 AM

It's linseed oil, asshole!

HungryWantBiddy Nov 16th, 2007 09:47 AM

I think it's garbage how he's being singled out man. He played (and excelled) in an era where EVERYONE was doing it. And to make him a scapegoat solely because he broke baseball's "sacred" record is bullshit. Look at Clemens... a 20+ year career, and I don't see anyone wanting to asterisk him or keep him out of the HOF. They credit his success to his intense training regimine...hmm.

I'm white, and I hate to play the race card...buuuuut..

Geggy Nov 16th, 2007 11:59 AM

But hank aaron did it on fried chicken and watermelon!

MattJack Nov 16th, 2007 01:09 PM

:( lol geggy stop being funny

HungryWantBiddy Nov 16th, 2007 01:54 PM

This isn't about Hank. This is about an entire era of sports being "juiced" up. Selig and Upshaw (head of the NFL players' union) try to act like they want blood testing for the HGH. In private though, I bet they're both scared shitless of the can o worms that would open.

American sports need to take a lesson. Look how international track and field is handled, or the Tour de France. You use steroids in either of the 2 and you're banned for a year minimum. The San Diego Charger's star linebacker Shawn Merriman (sp?) sat out 4 games last year for use of the juice. 4 GAMES! That's it! And he still has his Nike deal.

I guess it's just the double standard that bothers me here. Bonds used steroids, there's no real way to deny that. But to try to make an example of him while other stars' (inside and outside of baseball) use of performance enhancing drugs is all but ignored is a true injustice and it serves as a reminder of just how biased ("balanced?") the media really is.

Hank did it on fried chicken and watermelon. Babe did it on cigars and beer. Barry did it on 'roids and gatorade. Big shit. The times they are 'a changin'. I'm sick of people trying to crucify Bonds because of his public image. You can bet that if Bonds hadn't always had a mediocre (at best) relationship with reporters, they wouldn't all be trying to nail him to the wall right now. What about Ivan "Pudge" Rodriguez? If anyone's ever used steroids it's that fucker, and I have never heard any suspicions voiced about where he got all his muscles.

This shit pisses me off...if you can't tell. Hope that was coherent enough for you to read :)

El Blanco Nov 16th, 2007 03:13 PM

Bonds lied to a federal grand jury. Thats why he was indicted. It looks like Bonds is getting singled out because he is the most prolific player, took down a sacred record, and is a dick.

Pudge didn't use 'roids. He was always big. Thats where the nickname comes from. Also, he's always had injuries. The kind that steroids supposedly prevent.

My problem with all of this is the owners, execs and media dopes who are acting all righteous and angry. These assholes knew it was going on but didn't say anything. some of them probably facilitated the players using. Mike Lupica, Bud Selig and their ilk can all shut the fuck up.

I do think Bonds should go to the Hall of Fame. You can't claim he is a villain now after you were patting him on the back before 2003.

HungryWantBiddy Nov 16th, 2007 03:37 PM

Good points on the purjury. He lied to a federal court...kind of. And that explains his indictment. But I still can't help but feel this is a witch hunt being led by the media. Like I said, why didn't the media jump all over Merriman last year? He's still got a fucking endorsement deal with one of the biggest sporting goods companies in the world. No company would touch Bonds with a 10 foot pole.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the pudge thing. You don't catch as long as he does and still be one of the best in the league without some type of aid... but that's just speculation.

We agree on my main point. Bonds is taking the fall for every big leaguer who's juiced over the past 20 years and it's not fair. The man deserves to be a first ballot HOFer.

I like your last statement too. Selig is now trying to bring down and what brought baseball back; that hormone induced summer of Slammin Sammy and Big Mac. The hypocrisy is too much, even for me.

Sethomas Nov 17th, 2007 05:25 AM

Yeah, I guess something about an oaken bucket is going on here in town this weekend, or something. I was enjoying my 4:00 AM breakfast at a diner when a bunch of douches were talking about college sports and their lavish history. Anyways, at one point one douche said to another douche, "your blind hatred of Purdue is keeping us from having an intelligent conversation". I really felt like telling him that even if the course of their discourse managed to cogently derive Maxwell's Laws with only axioms taken from Plato's Republic, there would STILL be no such thing as an intelligent conversation about sports. I didn't, though.

El Blanco Nov 17th, 2007 07:25 AM

Ya, it is so much better to sound like a pontificating prick with a bunch of pretentious ramblings on a philosophy that probably doesn't even apply to the situation.

How can I be as smart as you?

KevinTheOmnivore Nov 17th, 2007 08:40 AM

Sports is dum!

Sethomas Nov 17th, 2007 11:20 PM

Hey El Blanco! Did you know that "pontificate" etymologically means "building bridges"? I just think that's pretty cool.

There are actually a lot of sports that I enjoy participating in. And, to be perfectly honest, when I kick a soccer ball I don't ruminate on the Confucian idea that it symbolizes a demonic head. But when it comes to professional athletics and its long and lurid history with the soft sciences, I think there's a lot to say about it being a sociological parasite. I mean, by being a PART OF THE SYSTEM I guess I have little room to talk. Some minimum wage sap pays $80 for a Peyton Manning jersey because it's LOCAL PRIDE, even though that handsome bloke only lives here because some nebulous corporation paid him countless millions to move here. The NFL takes in a tidy sliver of the profits to plug in countless millions into an otherwise pointless facility in downtown Indianapolis, and eventually down the line my dad gets paid a relatively minuscule fee to X-ray some moron millionaire athlete who'll probably be dead at 55 from some muscular dysmorphia-related ailment. And, as is the American way, my daddy pays for most of my college expenses. I'M A HYPOCRITE, GUYS.

El Blanco Nov 19th, 2007 09:11 AM

You forgot asshole.

HungryWantBiddy Nov 19th, 2007 10:36 AM

Seth, you were always picked last huh?

Sethomas Nov 19th, 2007 12:29 PM

Actually, no. And since this is about professional sporting and not sports in general, that question is about relevant as my asking you if your fecal complex lasted until eighth grade. But, you know, with your primarily (and probably only) sports-related posts in the philosophy forum demonstrating you to be illiterate (well, maybe you read and understood my post, but made a retarded non-sequitur comment anyways because you were offended and you had to do something, I dunno), I guess I should thank you for proving my point.

HungryWantBiddy Nov 19th, 2007 12:53 PM

No, Seth. Thank YOU for proving MY point.

HungryWantBiddy Nov 19th, 2007 12:59 PM

Also, I didn't know this was strictly a philosophy forum. If I read correctly, and I did, it's the Philosophy/Sociology/Religion/Politics/News/etc. forum. Thanks again, Seth.

El Blanco Nov 19th, 2007 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sethomas (Post 511666)
Actually, no. And since this is about professional sporting and not sports in general, that question is about relevant as my asking you if your fecal complex lasted until eighth grade. But, you know, with your primarily (and probably only) sports-related posts in the philosophy forum demonstrating you to be illiterate (well, maybe you read and understood my post, but made a retarded non-sequitur comment anyways because you were offended and you had to do something, I dunno), I guess I should thank you for proving my point.

Point?

You came into a topic on an internet message board you have no interest in and no knowledge of just to tell a bunch of people they are stupid for being concerned with a multi-billion dollar industry that has deep ties to American history. I'm sure you realize this a text book example of trolling.

Apparently, you were looking over the boards and decided there were too few douchebags around, so you increased their ranks by 1.

Well done, sir. Well done indeed.

Sethomas Nov 19th, 2007 06:31 PM

Okay, I'll get to you eventually Blanco, but first I have to remind Hungryhungryhippo that he's retarded. Just a sec.

Hey Hungry! I see what you did there with the whole, "you proved my point" thing without making any link as to what the flying fuck you're talking about. A surprise move indeed, I had no idea you studied in the Peewee Herman School of Rhetoric. Oh, and the inclusion of the hyperlink in your ridiculously prolix quotation of the board's name was a nice touch. I can't really see how it was at all necessary, but perhaps it's a bit much to ask you to say things purposefully.

Okay, Blanco. I saw this thread as an invitation to discuss professional sports in general because there's no reason in hell why the titular issue of Bonds being indicted should come as any shock nor should meet any opposition. I mean, if I were to make a post saying, "Alan Greenspan depletes ozone layer with burning of polyester American flag", with my intent being to express the idea that the ozone hole is a straw man argument, then I wouldn't be altogether surprised if someone started talking about the Federal Reserve or the right to burn the flag.

And by the way, I don't feel guilty for shitting on a pointless institution because it involves lots of money and lots of history. The money part is horrendously oligopolistic, and I'll point out that racism, xenophobia, and high cholesterol are all just as or more intimately tied to American history as professional sports.

HungryWantBiddy Nov 20th, 2007 11:47 AM

haha, yowza. "the Peewee Herman School of Rhetoric".. that actually made me laugh. Lighten up, Seth. You've proven your intellectual superiority...and my point, again.

Let me clarify this time, so you don't miss it:

You're a nerd. A loser, with nothing better to do than to troll a low-traffic forum and try to shoot others down. Why do you do that? Methinks it's because you were always picked last. Which, if you had been paying attention rather than seeing how far you could cram your nose up your own ass, you would have already known. I'm not interested in philosophy (maybe I'm just too dumb), so I don't give my input when others are seriously debating it. You obviously are not interested in discussing sports, so why did you post?

ANSWER: you're a loser, and you were always picked last.

Sethomas Nov 20th, 2007 11:04 PM

Oh. Sorry, I just read your flailing attempt at screwball psychoanalytical ad hominem as just kindergarten mud-slinging. I didn't respond to it because that would, you know, feed the trolls. I mean, it's not like there's a staggering precedent of sedentary and obese fans of professional sports, right?

So, no. I've been in competitive sporting teams for a strong majority of all my years of education and beyond. Four different sports, in fact.

You're unfounded in your claim that I'm not interested in discussing sports, I'm just not interested in discussing them in a light that you'll agree with. Your insistence that I find professional sports retarded because I'm not good at sports would be like claiming that Preechr or KKK or Blanco support an unregulated market because they're millionaire industrialists, or that Max supports civil liberties because he's a gay flag-burner who enjoys recreational abortions. Extrapolate from that, and the rest of your post is meaningless.

Anyways, here's a fun fact I once read about PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL: a young child (I forget how old) will burn as many calories playing in a pool or whatever on a summer day as a professional athlete will on gameday. I find the physiology behind that pretty amazing, and not in a positive way coupled with the fact that we pay athletes millions and heroes such as Mr. Bonds can't even keep up his end of the bargain without steroids.

MattJack Nov 21st, 2007 12:48 AM

yall niggaz is gay

HungryWantBiddy Nov 21st, 2007 10:25 AM

You may say a lot, but I'm still right.

El Blanco Nov 21st, 2007 10:52 AM

Do you know that children are different from adults? That your metabolism decreases as you get older?

KevinTheOmnivore Nov 21st, 2007 11:56 AM

This thread is so oligopolistic.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.