one day i might comment here. I saw this movie in the theater. :puke

a lot of peoples posts here are too long for me to read as I am sick with a fever, coming down from a month long construction project, and tired of people.

but yeah this movie sucked

I would have saved a lot of time at the chiropractors if I had known getting punched in the spine would fix my back.

Exactly. Sony owns Spider-Man, Fox owns X-Men and Fantastic Four.

Sony did a pretty good job on Amazing Spider-Man and while I liked X-men: First Class, I read that they've got the people who worked on X-Men 2 & 3 on this new one.

I have no hopes for it. Why can't they just make a decent goddamn ensemble movie with all the X-Men team from the late 80's/early 90's? We don't need anymore goddamn Hugh Jackman. Wolverine was only interesting when he was in a group dynamic, alone he bores the shit out of me.

Idk what you are all bitching about, it wasnt that bad. For a superhero movie, it was perfectly fine.

Yeah, fuck all of you. I enjoyed it quite a bit. That's pretty much all I have to say on the subject, because it's always such a pain in the ass debating this movie with people.

i think if it had cool fight scenes or cool gadgets or cool villains or cool memorable lines i would've liked it more

i loved it i went to see it twice at the theater and i think i'm getting the blu ray for christmas from my brother

I think it is mainly the lack of cool villains for me. You go from Scarecrow to the Joker to Bane? :/

i mentioned this before but somebody told me the third one was actually supposed to be the return of two face. but after heath ledger died they couldn't do it
i dunno if its true but they are comicbook and movie jerks so im sure they'd probably know

initially the 3rd movie was supposed to be all about two-face
tdk ends w/ the joker getting caught,3 was to start w/ dent prosecuting him, and joker throws acid in his face, and so on

that was how goyer wrote it, nolan took that and put it into tdk

I fail to see why they couldnt do two face without the Joker.

Yeah, I can totally see why Bane is the best way out.

oh
cuz in tdk two face does like two things then is gone forever
kind of anti-climatical

I see what you mean kahl. If his name would have been three-face he would have been in the third movie. since it isn't he was only able to be tdk.

:lol

The name of this movie still bugs me. You go from Batman Begins to The Dark Knight to The Dark Knight Rises?

Did they just get lazy naming the last one?

Batman does it again

they got lazy with everything

rehashed league of shadows plot (except it's a hell of a lot lamer)
rehashed plot of bruce being a prisoner/ finding a cop buddy and whatever the hell else

I hope they make Bearman next and have him talk like a bat.

Rumors: Joseph gordon-levitt might play batman in the jla movie.

^ spoilers

he's not though, thankfully

You ungrateful bastard.

:)

They probably won't ever be a JLA movie. If Man of Steel doesn't do well it's definitely not going to happen.

DC just can't seem to get their other superhero movie franchises out the door.

what he fuck is jla