The President's news conference....
 

....is on. Any thoughts thus far??

Right now he's blathering on about how muchhe prays, and stuff. I would LOVE it if he just said "f**k the Church" into the camera, I swear, he'd get my vote on '04.

Otherwise, seems like same old stuff.

Yeah total retread. Only new bit of information is that they're going to push for a vote regardless of what the other Security Council members decide on.

The only thing close to that so far (it ain't over yet) is that he believes that freedom is God's gift to everyone on earth. What is so wrong with that?

How much could either of you have seen? Honestly, this just looks like some 14 year old's attempt to sound funny and insightful.

Wrong. He was asked how much prayer helps him through this, and he listed this and that. He included that he prays for world peace. I find that ironic, considering his snub of the clergy organizations recently....

What the hell are you talking about? You need to relax, it's OK to make light of the President, the sanctity of the Executive branch won't come crumbling down.

EDIT: And I said "is on," I didn't say it was over and completely analyzed. Spinster and I were both commenting on what had been said. As we used to say in middle school: take a 'chill pill'

yeah, i think you read too much into that kevin. religion has not been a major part of this press conference. thus far its been more rhetoric and further beating of the dead horse.

So much for those OBL rumors.

I watched the first 35 minutes or so of it. Expected, safe, canned, regurgitated, dodged the likely bullets (economy, protests, etc. but especially the economy), put things in a black versus white perspective that only simple-minded buffoons could appreciate. The last point, of course, is his specialty.

:rolleyes I WAS COMMENTING ON WHAT WAS BEING SAID AT THE TIME I POSTED! GEEZ!

:confused

then you jumped the gun, good buddy.

he didnt dodge anything about the protests. he said pretty clearly that he is going to continue to try to convince france, germany, etc. that this is the right thing to do. he also said that if war becomes necessary, that we will all be surprised at how many people actually end up supporting it.

he dodged the Vietnam question completely. His answer didn't even have the word Vietnam in it.

I believe the reporter asked what he would say to the victims and families of victims of Vietnam. Bush's reponse was that we know what our goals are in attacking Iraq.

:rolleyes

vietnam is not relevant to any of this. the reporter was a fool to ask that and anybody who believes that the invasion of iraq will be like vietnam is a complete dumbass.

I think I missed something. Maybe something I said has been misunderstood. Never did I say "THE PRESIDENT'S PRESS CONFERENCE DENOUNCES THE CHURCH AND PROTESTORS!!" He most certainly DID say what I was criticizing.


He didn't dodge the protests, but he certainly dismissed them in a very "Nixonian" fashion. His assumption that everybody against war is some anti-capitalist anarchist is pretty ignorant.

He seemed confident about turning the SC vote, which I find unlikely. Maybe I'm wrong, but he seemed to be holding a less hostile tone. He said "I hope he disarms," and "I hope we can do this peacefully." a lot. I think he has actually watched his rhetoric a bit more with the protests, clergy, and other UN nations turning against him. Good for him. :)

I don't think our generals agree with you...? :/

Of course you see at least SOME similarities, at least the possibility of it being a highly unpopular war on the home front...?

sure its going to be unpopular on the home front, but this wont be a war that drags on for some 9-10 fucking years because our troops are too limited in what they can actually do. we arent going to lose 50,000 men if we go into iraq, they are only at 2/3 their original strength and we absolutely killed them in the first gulf war.

you kind of did jump the gun by criticizing him on any religious parts of his speech. that shouldnt be the reason you tune in and in my opinion it is kind of nitpicky.

by changing his tone you never know, he could sway some people over to his side...

I agree, but I don't know that we should dismiss the possibility of a tense batle in Baghdad that does take a ot of lives.

Politicians do things deliberately. He has basically had to tell religious groups throughout the week that although he loves God, he ultimately thinks they're all wrong (even his own Church). It's honestly a position I don't envy.

However, when he makes such a deliberate point to address how faithful he is ( all be it in response to a question), you can bet that it's intentional (his softer tone might be due to this as well). Now that several different faiths and denominations are involved in this, he can't maintain the same kind of talk (it seemingly only impresses the Southern Baptists).

And just like Bush you completley dodge. Its not the quality or timeliness that bothers me; its the fact that Bush completely refused to answer it.

no. thats not dodging. i am flat out telling you that vietnam is completely irrelevant to any of this. it would be like opposing world war 2 because of the spanish-americans war, the two are unrelated.

Yeah, on second thought I think this is right.

I thought the 'show your cards' challenge suggested that he was basically conceding that the US wouldn't get enough votes, or would get a veto. [/quote]

George W. Bush & Vietnam
 

When the time came for him to fight in the Vietnam war he made it his goal not to go.

The question was what would he say to guarentee this would not turn into another Vietnam. The idiot reporter just threw in the references to the veterans for some half assed sentimental pander.

The President guarenteed that he would do everything in his power to make sure the objectives are completed and that the men and women fighting would be taken care of and that the people of the region would assisted.

edit: nm, I just read a transcript of it. That question was painfully misleading.

"Wrong. He was asked how much prayer helps him through this, and he listed this and that. He included that he prays for world peace. I find that ironic, considering his snub of the clergy organizations recently...." - Kevin

Example?

He's not praying to clergy....

Do you or do you not agree that, you as a former Catholic, the Catholic Church has little or no credibility in this matter and should work on solving it's own problems before ANY credibility can be established to add weight to such criticism?

Personally, I don't care what the Pope says. I consider it to mean absolutley NOTHING. I will never understand how anyone could support anything stated by a man in charge of a church that supports child molestation.

Example of what he prays for, or an example of groups he has snubbed as of late? How about his own Church?

No, he's snubbing them.

When the Southern Baptist Church can come out and endorse war by misconstruing verses from Timothy or something, I think it shows that the Catholic Church structure isn't the only one that needs to work out some issues.

Sure the Catholic Church has issues. You are talking about human beings who are EXPECTED in many ways to be sinful. The only reason it's such a big deal that the Catholic Church hierarchy is HUMAN is because the Church has a serious problem with idolatry, but I digress.

Well, when your church supports death and murder and suffering, I might just go with the lesser of two evils.