Adamsite
 

Adamsite is a warfare device
So eveasite is his wife
Adamsite
began as Innosite

(adamsite is a warfare bomb gas,
a manipulation of the masses)

kissex,
Gabby GaGa

The hell you talkin' 'bout

you tryin' ta fight me.

I whup yo ass

I dont dig Necrocombat, Idi.
Maybe if i got suveniers,
legs, arms.
Yeah.

Bring it.

"Necrocombat" You are more clever than I originally took you for.

I will be more direct: Tell me how this is not a useless thread; "So eveasite is his wife" what the hell?

This is the Art shit thread

correct?

that is a poem.

IF adamsite is a warfare device, a product of distruction,
then there must be a creatorof such a devious device.

Eve led Adam into damnation

Eveasite is a representation of the obvious.

Adamsite was probably a Windex product before the government got ahold of it.

You desperatley need to create a poem thread.
or liturature
something of that nature.

i hate poetry

poems go in recommended reading. not art shit.

Poems go in the fire, with the rest of the books.

No she didn't, at least not according to Judaism.

No she didn't, at least not according to Judaism

Adam and Eve is an idea accessable to most people.

But thats a good point.

Still, Eve is a good reprenstation of deception
something seductive that can only lead to entrapment.

The downfall of Adamsite.

Deception? She herself was decieved by the serpent. She didn't decieve Adam.

Please read the Bible before you try to interpret what it says.

Didn't you people ever read Milton? Women are just plain inferior, jeez louise.

Why'd you post a bunch of asterisks? :confused:

she probably triple-posted or something. Anyways -this is the wrong forum. please make a note of it.

Eve clearly understood that the tree was off-limits, but Adam did too. He is clearly just as culpable as Eve.

Your notions about male-female relationships are very unhealthy, Gabby. Do you really view men as a bunch of dumb boys to coerce?

I view the history of statistics.
and conclude that women are manipulitive bitches.
See, the problem with your logic,
is the use of a teqnique that most politicians use.
Instead of sticking to the topic,
you turn the argument around on your opponent.
I view men as creatures that should be served by women.
We are supposed to be the submissive half of humanity.
I really do believe that men should be able to direct women,
instead of be manipulated by them.
If you noticed,
the last line is
"adamsite began as innosite"

So you have read Milton.

Might I see these statistics that you are citing? Any formal, peer-reviewed studies on the "manipulitive bitch" population?

Only because the arguement appears to be utterly convuluted.

Then get off the Internet, go get pregnant, and get back into the kitchen!

WHERE'S MY DINNER?! WOMAN, COOK ME A STEAK!

Women have been manipulative since our evolution. mostly due to the male supremicy pattern
dominate throughout history.
Men did the majority of hunting, and designated the women to cook the catches. Greedy as
they were, males would keep the larger share of food.
Subsequently, women had to develop manipulation skills to extract food and other goods from
the males.
Women are statistically more frequent shoplifters then men.
Women are usually the aggressors in a break-up with, or divorce from, their husband/spouse.

Don't get me wrong though, women are also beautiful creatures. They aren't all
manipulitve. But the many of them are.
most men will agree with this.

not a sufficient answer.
WHERE'S MY DINNER?! WOMAN, COOK ME A STEAK!

no one said women weren't picky
about the guys they "cook" for.

there's been women leaders of various societies.

and what the fuck are you using the bible as culpability for what male and female social structures are all about?


If some women are manipulative because it's the only type of power they can use i don't see your argument that they are manipulative by nature. Just because they are physically smaller means they are necessarily going to be manipulative?
Don't men manipulate? yes. if anything you are saying any person who is physically smaller will be manipulative, which sounds like the humors.

and what's the point? So a woman manipulates a few people, and a man savagely murders a few or some other cliche - which one is worse?

are you seriously saying that women are not manipulative?

As the owner of a penis, and most likley a credit card,
you should know otherwise.

Men aren't manipulitive.
Violent, yes.
they lie occasionaly.

But manipulation would imply some sort planning.
Men aren't planners. They're compulsive by nature.

If you don't think that women manipulate,
you have some tough lessons to learn with future relationships.

There have been sever serial killer women.
Women tend to be more emotionally driven,
which means they aren't as likley to kill.

However, a females emotions may be so strong to the point of horrific murder.
Take, for example, Lizzie Borden

She hacked her family, sisters, mother, to death,
cut of cody parts, and decapitated one.

I agree, though, men are a just as cruel as women. But in different way.

Women are usually concerned with the feelings of others. So while they may be manipulating behind your back, they still aren't intent on hurting men, and want to make their misdeeds lesser, just to help the male. When women know they've done something wrong, they are more inclined to feel genuine guilt.

Men on the other hand, will perform harmful acts, with disregard for females.

Women do alot of shit behind your back.
because they're great manipulators,
you never find out.

ah, every great argument has contained the word "fuck" in it.
Again,
I didn't so much use the bible
as i did the concept of adam and eve. Everyone knows who they are.
while I dont believe in the bible,
I enjoy it as a story.
If you read it even once you would have noted that it contains alot about human nature,
some pieces of which are still true today.

I win
you lose.

Its a good poem, and you know it.
You just want to be argumentitive.

not that thats a bad thing.