I-Mockery Forum

I-Mockery Forum (http://i-mockery.com/forum/index.php)
-   Philosophy, Politics, and News (http://i-mockery.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Bin Laden Near Capture (http://i-mockery.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9609)

imported_I, fuzzbot. Feb 21st, 2004 07:27 PM

Bin Laden Near Capture
 
http://www.sundaytelegraph.news.com....-28778,00.html



February 22, 2004

A BRITISH Sunday newspaper is claiming Osama bin Laden has been found and is surrounded by US special forces in an area of land bordering north-west Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The Sunday Express, known for its sometimes colourful scoops, claims the al-Qaeda leader has been "sighted" for the first time since 2001 and is being monitored by satellite.

The paper claims he is in a mountainous area to the north of the Pakistani city of Quetta. The region is said to be peopled with bin Laden supporters and the terrorist leader is estimated to also have 50 of his fanatical bodyguards with him.

The claim is attributed to "a well-placed intelligence source" in Washington, who is quoted as saying: "He (bin Laden) is boxed in."

The paper says the hostile terrain makes an all-out conventional military assault impossible. The plan to capture him would depend on a "grab-him-and-go" style operation.

"US helicopters already sited on the Afghanistan border will swoop in to extricate him," the newspaper says. It claims bin Laden and his men "sleep in caves or out in the open. The area is swept by fierce snow storms howling down from the 10,000ft-high mountain peaks. Donkeys are the only transport."

The special forces are "absolutely confident" there is no escape for bin Laden, and are awaiting the order to go in and get him.

"The timing of that order will ultimately depend on President Bush," the paper says. "Capturing bin Laden will certainly be a huge help for him as he gets ready for the election."

The article says bin Laden's movements are monitored by a National Security Agency satellite.

On Thursday last week, General Richard Myers, chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff, said America had been engaged in "intense" efforts to capture bin Laden, who was believed to be hiding in the border area between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

But he insisted that the focus of the search had not narrowed for months

El Blanco Feb 21st, 2004 07:35 PM

On another mesage board I am on, this is called an Iraqi Bigfoot.

A flashy, unsubsantiated headline that only one outlet is reporting, even though it would easily be one of the biggest stories of the last 3 years.

GAsux Feb 21st, 2004 07:46 PM

Rumors....
 
I suppose you could say I work in the "indusrty" and I'll be the first to admit that it's completely unsubstantiated gossip but I've heard a lot of grumblings lately along somewhat similiar lines. Perhaps not as dramatic as the "boxed in" story, but definitely along the lines of the fact that especially since Saddam's capture, the special ops folks in the region have made Osama priority #1. Makes sense in an election year and al.

Regardless, while the "capture" story may be a bit far off, Im convinced that there is probably at least some small element of truth to what's transpiring there right now.

da blob Feb 21st, 2004 08:27 PM

.
 
I hope it's not true.
We'd have to find someone else to kill you fucktards if he gets caught.

KevinTheOmnivore Feb 21st, 2004 08:28 PM

Thanks for being a useless human being. There aren't enough of you.

The One and Only... Feb 21st, 2004 08:43 PM

So, Kevin, what's it like living in the only state which maintains a libertarian congressman?

KevinTheOmnivore Feb 21st, 2004 08:51 PM

Does somebody pay you to derail thread topics, or do you merely do it in a "I'm a flippant 15-year old kid" sort of way....?

Ron Paul is a "Republican," just like Dennis Kucinich is a "Democrat." Big tent politics. Nothing new here, move along....

punkgrrrlie10 Feb 21st, 2004 09:30 PM

I think Osama is in San Fran right now marrying Elvis.

MEATMAN Feb 21st, 2004 11:07 PM

What's with the tabloid?

Ronnie Raygun Feb 22nd, 2004 04:22 PM

Whether or not this story is credible, I think he'll be caught before the election or by the end of the year.

mburbank Feb 22nd, 2004 05:24 PM

Why. exactly? I mean, I hope he is, I hope he's caught tomorrow, but what makes you think he'll get caught before the election?

Ronnie Raygun Feb 22nd, 2004 06:25 PM

It actually has nothing to do with the election in my point of view........the election itself is just kind of a landmark.....you know what I mean?

I mean, you have to believe that he will eventually either be killed or captured.....I just think it will be sooner than later.

teh_mastar! Feb 22nd, 2004 06:37 PM

I don't know about "captured or killed." He's pretty unhealthy, right? Either way, his days are numbered.

The_Rorschach Feb 23rd, 2004 11:50 AM

Osama bin who?

Emu Feb 23rd, 2004 11:51 AM

you know that guy that tried to kill us

The_Rorschach Feb 23rd, 2004 11:54 AM

He's so, like, fifteen minutes ago. Oh my gawd!

Buggerman Feb 23rd, 2004 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Emu
you know that guy that tried to kill us

you mean the guy who gets blamed when bush kills his own people on purpose for profit.

Perndog Feb 23rd, 2004 01:32 PM

They may very well have caught him already. If so, they won't give the media the story until A) they get all the information they need out of Bin Laden, B) they've milked the search to its fullest, and C) they have a good political reason to tell everyone they got him. We'll see whether the election qualifies for such a reason.

GAsux Feb 23rd, 2004 01:51 PM

No way
 
No way they've caught him. To assume that he could be caught without one single person involved mentioning it is silly.

Perndog Feb 23rd, 2004 01:54 PM

I hate to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but if what you just said were true then governments wouldn't be able to keep *any* secrets from us.

GAsux Feb 23rd, 2004 02:35 PM

...
 
"Any" secrets won't require a joint military venture likely with Pakistani military types as well as a substantial U.S. military force in order to capture him.

Unlike Saddam, it's very inlikely that bin Laden will not only be hiding alone in a hole, but also give himself up. Do you not think that there are representatives from virtually every news agency in the world watching every move of both U.S. and Pakistani forces in the region?

The military is not that good. It's not hard to figure out when something significant is going on.

Perndog Feb 23rd, 2004 03:12 PM

Saddam had plenty of folks (international too) looking for him, too, and he, just like bin Laden, didn't seem like the type to give himself up willingly or to be hiding out in the boonies by himself. I'm a little in the dark, so please tell me what makes the two searches so different.

mesobe Feb 23rd, 2004 03:24 PM

they dont want to catch him though. everytime the US wants to raise their retarded terrorist danger flag to pink or whatever, they blow up one of their embassies or a ship and lo! we have to save ourselves from the evil terrorists! save us, Bush! your our only hope!!

funny how a group of people who live in rat holes and caves can outsmart the most powerful nation in the world over and over again.

Perndog Feb 23rd, 2004 03:38 PM

See, now that's a real cuckoo. At least I'm reasonable with my theories.

mesobe Feb 23rd, 2004 03:44 PM

of course it sounds cuckoo... it must be if they dont want people to believe it.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled on men was convincing men that he didnt exsist

:)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.