View Single Post
  #6  
sspadowsky sspadowsky is offline
Will chop you good.
sspadowsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Thrill World
sspadowsky is probably a spambot
Old Jan 13th, 2004, 06:17 PM       
Unemployment would not stay the same, doofus. When people stop looking for work, they are *gasp* no longer looking for work. Which means they are no longer considered part of the work force, which means they are no longer considered "unemployed." Which, in turn, cuts the number of "unemployed" people.

A good economy does have jobs. Our economy has jobs, they just keep getting shipped to other countries. And the above article is not the only place I've seen those numbers. I'd like to see your sources, and the Cato Institute doesn't count.

And, if you may pull your young head out, you'll see very clearly that Bush isn't being blamed for the economy, he's being blamed for lying about its condition. Which he is.

While Bush may have inherited an economy that was recession-bound, it is his administration's policies which have kept it there.

Your last paragraph is such a mess that I'm not even going to address it. Turn it into something resembling English, and we'll talk.
__________________
"If honesty is the best policy, then, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy. Second is not all that bad."
-George Carlin
Reply With Quote