|
|
|
=======
|
| |
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
|
|
Sep 30th, 2004, 11:18 PM
Did Bush sucessfully label Kerry a flip-flopper? No. This would have been pretty easy to do, and Dubya failed.
Did Kerry successfully convince anyone that he'd do what Bush did but better? No. This would have been much harder to accomplish than the simple thing Bush needed to pull off, but that was the direction he chose in his own campaign. He failed in the job he needed to do.
Iran, North Korea and Africa were just wasted time. No points were made in anything other than the Iraq question, and Kerry failed to make that seem to be something other than an intregal part of the larger War on Terror. If the majority of Americans go to vote on November 2 believing Iraq to be part of the WOT, Bush wins, assuming Iraq is the decisive issue. I think it will be, and I think Kerry has thrown the election with his campaign of "What he said, but better."
| |
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?
How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
| |
|
|