View Single Post
  #8  
davinxtk davinxtk is offline
GO AWAY DONT POST HERE
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Up.
davinxtk is probably a spambot
Old May 30th, 2005, 02:43 PM       
A chilling concept, I'm sure.
But that's not the point here, they're not giving the girls' names to every single porn customer, they're giving them to to the people who sell the porn.
There's actually two benefits I'm seeing to this:

1) The owners of happyhorsesex.com can now get in touch with their most popular models and provide further content, instead of just getting new stuff every day.

2) In the event that a model decides to pull all of her adult content from the web (e.g. Alyssa Milano) it will be infinitely easier to track down (provided it went through the proper channels in the first place).

But I do see the point about the information being duplicated and distributed. This law definitely isn't going to accomplish what it's trying to accomplish, and it's going to make a lot of information less secure. But your analogy is like "if we let men marry men, soon they'll be marring dogs." It's an ass-backwards way to try and solve the problem but it's not going to bleed into every other sector of the economy.

And I still don't get how it could be used against "homosexuality, non-whites, non-christians, etc."






And yet I'm the drama whore.
__________________
(1:02:34 AM): and i think i may have gone a little too far and let her know that i actually do hate her, on some level, just because she's female
(1:03:33 AM): and now she's being all kinds of sensitive about it
(1:03:53 AM): i hate women
Reply With Quote