View Single Post
  #33  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Jun 16th, 2005, 07:14 PM       
Quote:
is this the only photo you're basing this "evidence" off of? And what the hell do they mean 'several' people? I see one 'person.'
there are other photos.. and i don't see any inferno.. the jet fuel burned up in the first few minutes. the photos refute the inferno statements, not totally of course, just another piece of the puzzle.

[quote]They fell at free fall speed because concrete cracks. [quote]

yea but concrete resists cracking.. if there was no demolition the buildings simply wouldnt have fallen that fast. think about it.. FREE FALL.. that means it acted as if there was NOTHING beneath it, your going to state that the concrete provided next to NO RESISTANCE? i just don't accept that. i do realize that it wasn't exactly freefall but close to it.

Quote:
And yes, no major steel structure has collapsed because of fire. That's because the fires were put out in time.
steel structures have burned for over 12 hours and the steel has not even been bent or showed any damage at all. rubbish fires (paper, carpet, computers, plastic, wood.etc.) cannot by themselves effect structural steel enough to cause it to bend or fail, the temps are not high enough.. unless maybe you feed it oxygen in an enclosed controlled space. steel melts at around 2400 degrees, rubbish fires reach around 1400 degrees.

again, i could understand maybe one building, but we're talking about THREE coming down almost exactly the same way.
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote