[kahljorn]

I saw what you suggested, how does that change any of what i said? Doesn't that just support it in a way since I'm suggesting the "Hudna" should be accepted on the grounds that it will weaken their diplomatic standing, if they had any in the first place?? I think you're the one who needs to learn reading comprehension.
Again, just in case you don't understand what i was saying, "IF THE TRUCE IS FAKE THATS GOOD BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THEM LOOK LIKE SHIT". I'm not denying it might be fake, in fact, I'm embracing it in the hope of interest.

"Define "Criminal" you dipshit. "

Um, well according to the dictionary it's someone who's being punished or targetted by the penal system. As far as I know he hasn't been charged with any crimes.
Secondly, considering we are at war it can't really be considered a crime. And if it could, then should we be held responsible for the civilian deaths in last weeks airstrike? Are we criminals?

I don't know, I'm not going to play that stupid game. It seems ridiculous to sit here and argue over if he's a criminal; you only think he's a criminal because he attacked our country, but I doubt you think that of our entire Government or the american public when they attack and kill civilians. You hypocritical fuck.
What he did may have been wrong but it's not like there's not some kind of tit for tat relationship between america and him.