[Courage the Cowardly Dog]

I still don't understand how MrBurbank thinks we can address problems of terrorism without force? Or is he supporting the killing of civilians as a method to get what you want, unless their on the opposite side then it's wrong?

May i ask how do you suggest you fight terrorism? Ignore it like we did in the 90s? Throw money at their enemies like we did in the 80s? Fight it but make no attempt striking their sources? Like arms and monetary suppliers?

What if they take hostages or do the entire war carring around their whole family?

It kind of reminds me of a famous egyptian battle. The Babylonians (or Assyrians I forget) put small cages on the front of their shields and put cats in the cages. The egyptans couldn't fire from a distance without hurting tha cat and had to be extra careful not to hurt it when they got close, cause the cat is sacred to them.

Of course children are far more important then cats, but you can't just roll over, you take caution and fight as much as you can around the kids cause you are protecting YOUR kids who have been dying from their constant rocket attacks. If a few of their kids die it's a very sad thing, but you don't blame the police sniper for the hostage holder's crime. You cant cease at every death or else you and your children will die. It's children dying that is why this war was provoked in the first place, the kidnappings just pushed the edge and broke the camel's back.