SUBJECTS RESPONSE AFTER EXPOSED TO CIRCULAR ARGUMENTS THAT SHE CANT DEFEAT BECAUSE SHE IS DUMB:
"I'm no longer reading your responses because you're the type of person who beats a subject like a dead-red-headed horse stepchild with circular and repetive argument.
My god, say something new. "
GUESS YOU FAILED THE EXPERIMENT YOU CANT KEEP UP ANYMORE DONT FORGET TO PUT THIS IN YOUR BOOK
Quote:
This thread (in the later part), was my failed attempt at an experiment. I'm doing a study on human observence and reaction to pseudo-intellect.
my point in the study is to prove that when you back a seemingly intelligent person into a corner,
they'll fall apart from the effects of circular arument. Kahl was meant as the intellegent subject. However, his reaction is a bit different then I expected.
7 out of 10 of my subjects were perfectly intelligent and well educated people,
however, I found that when I present them with a roundabout argument, they eventually break down.
|
ps haven't you been talking about women being subservient bitches the entire time and repeating yourself.. yes. so why dont you get something new, because we've already refuted all of your arguments.
I just talked about simone debeauvour not that i expect you to know who you are why dont we talk about that you just keep talking about how they are subservient but when someone says something otherwise you can't refute it at all or use your brain.
anyway this argument has been over since it began you are a horrible arguer so quit acting like yo u're winning or something everyone knows you're trying to save face.