[mburbank]

So now what you meant by your article is more people are aware of the attention a Speaker of the house recieved for a racist gaffe than a minor representative recieved for his racist gaffe, even though the representative was directly criticized by his party leadership and immidiately stepped down, and the Speaker refused to for weeks and was never asked to step down by his leadership?

That's what you meant when you said people with a D next to their name get free pass? You meant Trent Lott speciffically got a more raw deal than Moran speciffically? And thats why you were writting about the trouble Santorums gotten himself into, even though he hasn't been punished in any way?

It's not that you didn't even know Moran had a leadership post, or that he stepped down or that he was publicly asked to step down by the Minority leader or that he was roundly critisized in the very media outlets you suggest said little? It's not that you didn''t bother to find out? You were just kind of overstting your case a tiny bit for effect and you relly did know what you were talking about?

Okay. If that's what you meant to get across with your article and you actually were informed on the subject matter, I'm willing to take yiu at your word. But you know what that means? You can't form and argument or write an essay worth shit.

It's A or B Vinnie. You spoke out your ass or you can't put an essay together to communicate a simple point.