Quote:
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
The length of this article is boring the hell out of me
|
I would imagine you have difficulty with directions on pancake batter boxes, too.
Quote:
When he said we give away the most money, did he say percentage wise or did he say total dollar amount wise?
|
"When the host claimed (5/8/01) that the United States "give[s] far and away more tax money to foreign countries than anyone else. . . . Nobody else even comes close to us," Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies was thankfully on hand to explain that U.S. contributions per capita were lower than those of any member of the European Union. "That's not true," O'Reilly inaccurately responded."
He clearly DID mean percentage wise, because he promptly denounced her ACCURATE correction of his misinformed ass.
Quote:
And you do realize that you are getting your information from FAIR, who could be considered fair if they existed in China. At least the MRC admits they are conservative. For your own intellectual safety, I wouldnt trust ANYTHING from FAIR without verifying it first. Hell, I don't blindly trust the MRC, because they can get melodramatic at times.
|
I know all about FAIR, and in fact know Peter Hart. But thanks for the tip, bud. So you can dispute the claims that are made? Those quotes are
clearly fabrications then, right???
And by disputing FAIR before you dispute their claims, you have fallen right into my trap. Sure FAIR is biased. That was the point. You will fall right in line with anything said by David Horowitz, AND Bill O'Reilly or Neil Boortz, without even thinking twice. But I post two editorials, with ACCURATE quotations, and you dispute them as some Liberal conspiracy. Typical.