Quote:
Originally Posted by pac-man
The BCS didn't ruin football, but it has pooped on NCAA Div. I football. Even the old way was better than this. At least multiple Nat'l Champs recognizes that there are two outstanding teams that unfortunately could not play each other due to the way the bowls were seeded. People didn't cry and boycott then because they were used to it and because no one game was deemed the National Championship game. It allowed for each bowl to have Nat'l title significance and if there were two teams that were deserving, then there were two teams that got deemed champion.
|
So you are happy with 3 teams splitting the national championship like Miami, Georgia Tech, and Colorado did in '90? Or how about 5 co-champions like in 1981? Giving out multiple championships doesn't solve anything and is akin to giving gold stars to all the kids in class because everyone is equal and they tried their darndest. At least the BCS makes an attempts to match up the top 2 teams (although not a perfect system). To say that college football was better off without it boggles my mind.