[GAsux]

If that's how you honestly feel than I respect that. It doesn't always seem so. It seems like a lot of times you post "alternative" sources and imply that they are somehow more truthful simply because they are "alternative" and I think that's completely unfair.

Just as you could argue that the corporate incfluenced mainstream media is partial to the administration, you could argue that such alternative media sources are intent on slandering the administration. I don't suppose it would go over to well if a reputable alternative liberal press put out articles that evenr emotely agreed with the administrations stance, even if there were some agreement.

What I'm getting at is there is no more truth or fairness in the article you posted than the "hero" articles CNN distributes. I'm sure there is a fair amount of embellishment going on in both camps.