[CaptainBubba]

1. None of you(all inclusive of humanity and all other inhabitants in our apparent plane of existence.) have any idea what entails an existence beyond our understanding. The fallicy in assuming that you have any knowledge concerning such a thing should be painfully apparent to anyone but a retard or someone blindly hopeful in the "supernatural"

2. If something exists within the bounds of our ability to understand it then it can either be proven or disproven.

THEREFORE: If god exists beyond out understanding then your pulling complete and utter shit out of your purely human ass (And in a VERY arrogant and ignorant way). If god exists in such a way that we can understand it then there remains to be seen any such evidence for an entity of any description of god I've ever heard.

The Bible, as well as every other piece of religious literature, is a book, written by humans with absolutely no actual scientific founding to suggest why anyone should believe in this "god" entity. If you plan on relating this statement to historical records then by all means do, but know that you're lying to yourself in thinking its a valid argument. Just as with any religious record one should excersise at least some level of sceptisism.

If I read that Voltaire was actually the spawn of Magularato, creator of time, and was sent to give us the ability to empty our bowels I would treat it just as I treat the Bible.

I know there is no way that people haven't thought about this before, so is there something I'm missing? I wasn't raised with any particular religion so I guess it may be that there is no foundation hardwired into my brain to believe in something with no actual founding. How can people completely disregard logic and just say, "Meh, I don't care. I still think theres a "god" ".

I can't do that. I can't deny logic. :/