Quote:
Originally Posted by The Leader
Uh, terrorism is just a term used to help differentiate between actors.
|
I hope by actors you mean synthetic agents and or
Provocateurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Leader
What you write is true when you look at a lot of media and people who are not familiar with terrorism studies and such, like many politicians, but the term isn't actually some judgemental thing.
|
Most army veterans who are against the war are now consider a "terror" threat similar to pro-liberty groups in America. In police handbooks they tell them that property rights activists and constitutionalists may be home grown "terrorists"
Youtube it. They have recordings of news broadcasts that cover the key talking points of mass paranoia.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Leader
The US has supported terrorists and the reason that some terrorists target the US is because they feel that the US is a aggressor or supporter of a agressor.
|
By terrorists do you mean innocent civilians? Because that's what the American public is told who the "terrorists" are. Most individuals fightings the coalition are people who've had family killed in bombing raids or who've lost everything because of the illegal war / occupation.
There are no such thing as terrorists. There are poor people standing up to an imperialistic army run by private for-profit corporations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Leader
Blah, blah, blah, passive aggressive comment.
|
Ok.