View Single Post
  #45  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Oct 2nd, 2005, 01:07 AM       
"It was weak because one is TGI fucking Friday's and the other is THE UNITED STATES ARMY. Who should be enforcing their rules more strictly? Which one can levee a court martial if their rules aren't followed? What's in your head? "

I didn't make the statement that, "People who go to work have to obey rules just like the army does, they say not to talk on your cellphone... etc." Kayo? Notice the playfulness?

"If you're ordered not to take pictures, you're ordered not to take pictures. Just like most employers don't allow cell phones, the military doesn't, generally, allow photogaphs of corpses to be taken (and if they were aware that they're being used as currency, those orders would carry even more weight)."

That was the quote, which i quoted right above it... who are you arguing with, honestly. I hate people who can't decifer simple things like quotation marks... and what other people in the thread have said. A little obsessed with me, maybe?


Yea, well, like i said, I wouldn't be surprised if there was a rule. I was saying who cares if there's a rule for it, it's a stupid thing to be outraged about. That's the nature of war. Haven't you seen hollywood movies about Vietnam? Raping villagers, injecting soldiers with lsd?
You can't blame them for breaking under the pressure. Most of the people there probably didn't expect to be there. It's so pointless to even wonder about, there's always prisoners being tortured and ridiculed.
Regardless, what outrage can any of you afford, you're not even in iraq. Fighting in some corrupt army that doesn't really give a shit about you. Do you think it was somebody who did it to undermine the entire functionality of the world? No. Do you think he did it to cause moral decline? No. What bad thing occured? Because he traded for porn? Who cares, better than him lusting after women and raping them, or buying cheap iraqian hookers.
Your outrage is only there because they traded it for pornography. If it had been for food to feed starving iraqians it would've been okay.. or if it was for money to send home.. but because it's pornography? I don't see you giving that 5 dollars to march of dimes. You're just ashamed of your lustful nature and want to see it banished from anywhere in your mind.

__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote