Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KevinTheHerbivore
I'll admit that his data is often exaggerated, but the assault upon the film is likewise exaggerated. I've gone through that entire diatribe indicting him of...whatever, and a lot of it is petty, minor, and doesn't change the crux or the substance of his argument (now, the question then is should a true, er, "documentarian" ???, actually HAVE an argument....maybe not).
|
I disagree. Some of his most convincing points and critical assertations in the movie were based upon lies or gross exaggerations. Every part of that movie was in one way falsified, exaggerated, or severely edited in relation to reality. The fact that you claim they are "minor" (which they aren't) removes any credibility one may have of him. The fact that he is lying on such subtle fronts only makes you wonder what he did to the big picture.