View Single Post
  #133  
Preechr Preechr is offline
=======
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
Preechr is probably a spambot
Old Sep 12th, 2006, 01:55 AM       
We are at war with those that would use violence to suppress others, "we" being the most effectively violent thing in the history of the planet. A "War on Islamofacists" is revisionist and retarded. Was Saddam Hussein an "Islamofascist," or was he a decidedly un-Islamic-by-any-measure despot that was attacked within the criteria of THIS war? How many wars are we fighting?

Suddenly calling it a "War on Islamofacists" is to allow Max, once he's had the time to sort it all out, to say that we started a "War on Islamofacists" in Afghanistan, then switched gears to fight a "War against Saddam's Regime in Iraq," which allowed "Islamofascists" into Iraq, where we are now fighting another "War on Islamofacists." He would then facetiously ask which country are we going to behead next in order to broaden the "War on Islamofacists." THAT is why calling it a "War on Islamofacists" is retarded.

TERROR is the last available tool for someone to use violently against someone else. "War" is no longer conflicts between nations or alliances of nations. We tried "Cold War," a new concept in warfare, but that's out now, too. We are now in the era of Superpower vs. the regime. We did not declare war against Iraq... just it's leadership. We did not declare war against Afghanistan, just the bad guys holed up there. Saddam and the Taliban and the "Islamofascists" and C.O.B.R.A all use violence in the form of terror to suppress what we feel should be FREE people, so we kill them... "we" being the most effectively violent thing in the history of the planet.

I have asked this before to no avail: When terror no longer produces results for bad guys, what method is left? The pressure is on for all of these violent groups to disarm and form political movements that seek to do whatever they wish within the confines of the political arena DEMOCRATICALLY, just as God intended it. Unfortunately, God never enforced that, preferring instead to God-give us all inalienable rights and then leave it up to us to sort it all out, so now it's up to the Neo-Cons to make sure EVERYBODY gets to enjoy the freedoms of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?

How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
Reply With Quote