"The sun is still composed of a plasma."
The sun is a mass
Of incandescant gas
A gigantic nuclear furnace
Where Hydrogen is turned into Helium
At a temperature of thousands of degrees
Whoah-Ho its hot!
The sun is not
A place where we could live
But here on Earth
There'd be no life
Without the light it gives
And that's one to grow on!
So we're debating priori VS posteriori? To what end? Ultimately, as much as I see Kant's reponse to the question of Absolute Truth to be equalitive with an alchoholic in denial, I have to admit I've yet to come up with anything to debase his assertions. It's just a gut instinct which tells me both are dichotomous, it is self evident, at least in this now, that analytic truths can be drawn from synthetic suppositions/assumptions.