Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
And pj, your first question will be ignored becuase if you are too stupid to read, then you are too stupid to be acknowledged.
|
Vince, reading your posts can very seldom actually be called 'reading'. 'Interpreting the abstract' would be a more fitting description.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VinceZeb
Your second statement, however, is easily settled. Look at the "proof" of all the various religions. Buddhism doesn't have a lot of proof that is based in history. Judaism/Christianity/Islam has more proof based on history. If someone duplicated the above religions today, there would be more witnesses to what happened instead of the few that were around now. But, if someone were to duplicated Buddhism, they would be laughted at and treated the same as someone who believed in Scientology.
|
What you're talking about here is not 'loopholes and design flaws'. What you're talking about is historical proof. A design flaw would be a god who's all powerful and infallible and still manages to create a race that was so different from what he had planned that he had to kill them all. Then he afterwards admitted he kinda overreacted. Then, five thousand years later, he decides that he messed the basic rules up and changes them mid-game by sending Jesus to Earth.