Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kahljorn
One thing I want to know is where's the 911 conspiraicists debunking of that engineer report? That thing seems fairly accurate to me considering it likely has scientific evidence backing it. Usually uncredible science is debunked by credible scientists.
|
People argue that engineers around the world agree how wtc collapsed yet three scientific studies by engineers have come up with three different explanations...
Nist report-truss failure theory
Fema report-pancake collapse theory
Silverstein report-column failure theory
So which one is it?