[derrida]

So, this piece really should be more accurately titled "the case against sexuality," as you are not so much attacking homosexuality per se but the concept of sex for its own sake.

When you talk about the people who should feel consisigned to celibacy I can only assume that you are talking about that subset of homosexuals who are basically born queers. Like so utterly effeminate that no account of "socialization" could ever possibly account for just how fucking GAY they are. I know it's tempting to label them "diseased," and even if you wanna seriously look at human souls as existing in a hierarchy defined by darwinian fitness you can't argue against the utilitarian benefits of dykes and fags, and the unique skills they bring to society. You say fucking for comfort is cool, so if they wanna fuck eachother for comfort in healthy mutually supportive relationships, what's so bad about that?