|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mean Streets of New York
|
|
Mar 10th, 2010, 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Leader
Well, the first article has some errors in it such as stating that Phil Jones' data is "Crucial to the theory of climate change." I wasn't aware that a single person could be so important in a theory that has been around for over a hundred years or so.
The rest, I assume, are talking about how businesses have manipulated data, etc. While this all shows that individuals and groups are fraudulent, I don't see how it proves that global warming is not true. All you have is a logical argument, but global warming, too, is a logical argument. That and it has immense amounts of data and fact while you're simply speculating. You can't disprove global warming, apparently, only point to liars who have supported it.
|
Ok.
|
|
|
|