Thread: for geggy
View Single Post
  #19  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Sep 12th, 2006, 03:53 PM       
all i have to say after reading portions of this geggy is that the people who wrote this are smarter than you and probably the Engineers with an associates or whom graduated from the bottom of the class who correspond with you.

I don't really think they care about political association or anything. This report has no political affiliation whatsoever. It's an engineering site. What they care about is that the building was part of a progressive engineering/architectural "Experiment", which is why there was claims it would be able to stand up to the impact of a plane, which was addressed in the FAQ if you care to read it.

What they are interested in doing is finding out what happened and why the building collapsed and how to build it next time so that it won't collapse. Also they are interested in any other data they can use to improve their building abilities.
That's why the report is so big, because it's written to encompass every single aspect of what happened which means they need every detail of the building and every detail of what happened inside to all the people; then they incorporate it into their future buildings.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote