Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Display Modes
punkgrrrlie10 punkgrrrlie10 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Old Aug 11th, 2003, 06:11 PM        Desegregation

BATON ROUGE, Louisiana (AP) -- President Eisenhower was launching his re-election bid in 1956 when black schoolchildren here embarked on what has become the nation's oldest school desegregation lawsuit.

Now, nearly a half century later, a judge who keeps the original, yellowed papers in a vault is set to bring the case to a close with a long-awaited settlement.

But the decades of legal turns have done little to achieve the lawsuit's goal of integration or made things much better for what are now the plaintiffs' grandchildren.

Middle-class whites have largely abandoned this city's beleaguered, 45,000-student public school system, which is now nearly 75 percent black. Money has been tight. No new schools were built between 1974 and 2002. At one school north of downtown, water leaks through stained ceiling panels, and flakes of peeling paint must be swept from the children's bathrooms.

"I don't know whether it should be over or not," said Mary Ann Pharr, whose name was put on the original complaint when she was a first- or second-grader -- she can't remember, it's been so long.

"I really don't see that many changes. If you're in a poor district you just don't have the same opportunities."

The settlement, up for a final hearing Thursday before U.S. District Judge James Brady, is itself a mixture of formulas to parcel out the few remaining whites.

Proponents frankly admit its main virtue is to end the long-running suit.

"I don't think it's going to mean a whole lot for any kind of integration. I don't think that's possible now," said Carl Bankston, a Tulane University expert on desegregation in Louisiana schools.

It's an ironic twist on the simple plea of 1956 that black children in the then-separate system be allowed to "enroll, enter, attend classes and receive instruction in the public schools on a non-segregated and nondiscriminatory basis." It was signed, among others, by Thurgood Marshall, later a Supreme Court justice but then with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

That plea was shunted aside, here as elsewhere in the South. The judge who presided over the lawsuit for the first two decades was once a vocal opponent of integration, and Baton Rouge schools continued to operate largely as they had before.

When a new justice, U.S. District Judge John Parker, took over 25 years after the suit's filing, he was appalled that so much time had elapsed with so little progress -- and ordered busing. That was 1981, a decade after most places had already gone through busing's contortions.

The cure was late and drastic, and white students, 60 percent of the system in 1980, immediately began draining out. The numbers of whites in city schools dropped from 42,000 then to only about 12,000 today.

"We would have more integration today if we had simply let the neighborhood schools do their work," said Christine Rossell, a Boston University expert on desegregation who has been the school district's consultant in previous decades.

"It's really kind of sad when you think about it. We forgot some important economic principles," Rossell said. "Which is that people vote with their feet."

Many blacks who fought for the settlement bristle at that kind of analysis.

"When you consider the attitudes of Baton Rougeans at the time, I would rather they left," said John Pierre, an NAACP attorney. "So what, they left. There is no rule that says you have to have whites to have a quality education system."

But in a city of 410,000 where nearly half of black schoolchildren live in poverty, whites have the money to pay for schools. Voters consistently turned down school funding proposals, finally approving a modest one in 1998.

In 1996, officials still desperately trying to solve the Baton Rouge desegregation case substituted magnet schools for busing. But whites didn't come back and private school enrollment boomed. By 2000, of all the whites in school in Baton Rouge, 74 percent of them were outside the public system.

The New York Times in 1963 praised Baton Rouge for preserving "moderate racial policies." So why did school desegregation take longer to resolve in this city than elsewhere?

One key factor was the first judge who presided over the desegregation case, U.S. District Judge E. Gordon West. In the same year the Times lauded the city's stand on race, West called the Supreme Court's landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision that integrated public schools "one of the truly regrettable decisions of all times."

In 1975, he declared the case over and Baton Rouge's schools desegregated. A higher court overruled him, however, and eventually busing and the closing of some schools was decreed.

The case dragged on, evolving into a political grudge match.

"Too much politics, too many people who didn't want to give up ground," said Samuel Moncrief, who was a small child when his name was put on the suit in 1956. "I wished it would have been settled a long time ago."
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.

© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.